The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old November 14, 2018, 11:48 AM   #1
FunGramps
Member
 
Join Date: September 27, 2018
Posts: 16
Washington Initiative 1639 results: stronger gun control laws approved

My 2 cents...or maybe $1:
First off, I do believe in thorough background checks. Among other reactions to this complex and sweeping anti-gun law, I get two gut checks which many may not read into it at first glance.

My daughter is a veteran LEO, so my thoughts are initially directed to LEO safety. In this new law, Washington state has made it easier to prosecute officers who THEY believe used deadly force unjustly. In a far left state, you can see the writing on the wall with this. With the new hatred our liberal friends have instilled toward our police, and their penchant for protecting criminals before the lives of our law enforcement officers, and dragging our LEOs through the mud in court and in the media, many police are hesitant to use their weapons the instant they are is needed. They end up with grieving families.This new law will give many of our police even more hesitation to use deadly force as those critical life/death seconds tick by. Police are trained to assess and act upon their training and instinct...within seconds. This law will eventually be responsible for the needless deaths of LEOs. The criminal wins again.

Secondly, this law is all about restrictions for lawful citizens and police, but does not focus, in any manner, upon implementing more stringent punitive measures for those on the other side of the law...those criminals who actually perpetrate gun violence.

Telling, isn't it?

Time to funnel more litigation funds to the NRA.

I'm thinking of moving to Wyoming.
FunGramps is offline  
Old November 14, 2018, 01:00 PM   #2
cjwils
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 28, 2010
Location: Washington state
Posts: 323
I-1639 is separate from the other measure (I-940) passed by WA state voters to make it easier to go after LEO's who shoot people without just cause. I voted against 1639 but voted for 940 because prior Washington state law made cops virtually untouchable for a bad shoot.
cjwils is offline  
Old November 14, 2018, 01:35 PM   #3
FunGramps
Member
 
Join Date: September 27, 2018
Posts: 16
You are correct. My mistake. My contention still hold true though. A "bad shot" will be much more highly scrutinized by the biased liberal courts, depending on the state. Also interesting is this:

There is a clause in the initiative 1649 which exempts all government employees from prosecution if they, in good faith, end up allowing someone to violate the initiative in any way, but when it comes to the dealer, regardless of "good faith"..they get this:

(b) A dealer who sells or delivers any firearm in violation of
RCW 9.41.080 is guilty of a class C felony. In addition to any other
penalty provided for by law, the dealer is subject to mandatory
permanent revocation of his or her dealer's license and permanent
ineligibility for a dealer's license.
FunGramps is offline  
Old November 14, 2018, 03:14 PM   #4
Glenn E. Meyer
Staff
 
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 19,715
Under discussion here already.

https://thefiringline.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=595746

Closed, so continue there please.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens
Glenn E. Meyer is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2018 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.05433 seconds with 8 queries