The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old November 21, 2018, 07:10 PM   #1
steve4102
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 23, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,890
Mance v. Whitaker

Don't have a clue what it says or what it means.

Thought maybe you guys could comment on it.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketP...3-petition.pdf
steve4102 is offline  
Old November 21, 2018, 08:40 PM   #2
dogtown tom
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 23, 2006
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 2,346
It's a writ of certiorari to the US Supreme Court. Basically asking that the lower court release the record allowing the higher court to review the case....in this case the US Supreme Court.


The summary is right there on page 2:
Quote:
QUESTION PRESENTED
Federal law bars consumers from acquiring handguns
outside their home state. This prohibition limits
choice and price competition, and forces many handgun
buyers to arrange and pay for the handguns’ shipment
to in-state federal firearms licensees (“FFLs”). The
government theorizes that the prohibition is necessary
to combat the circumvention of state and local handgun
laws. Yet some jurisdictions allow interstate handgun
sales, or preclude the circumvention of handgun laws
through retail channels by requiring police authorization
for all handgun transfers. Meanwhile, federal law
allows FFLs to sell rifles and shotguns to non-residents,
so long as they comply with state and local laws.
Washington, D.C. residents Tracey and Andrew
Hanson sought to buy handguns from Fredric Mance,
a Texas-based FFL. The District lacks firearm retailers,
but it authorizes interstate handgun sales, and requires
that all firearm purchases be authorized by
police prior to consumers taking delivery. Reflecting
various divisions among the courts of appeals regarding
the Second Amendment’s application, the Fifth
Circuit divided 8-7 as to whether and how the federal
interstate handgun transfer ban is unconstitutional
on its face or as-applied to the Hanson-Mance transactions.
The question presented is whether prohibiting interstate
handgun sales, facially or as-applied to consumers
whose home jurisdictions authorize such
transactions, violates the Second Amendment and the
equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment’s
Due Process Clause.
What the plaintiffs want is for the USSC to agree with the Fifth Circuit decision.

Mance vs Holder, Sessions and now Whitaker.....seeks to eliminate the prohibition on purchasing a handgun when in another state. Currently a nonresident can purchase only rifles and shotguns when outside his state of residence, and only rifles or shotguns that would be legal to purchase/possess in his own state.
__________________
Need a FFL in Dallas/Plano/Allen/Frisco/McKinney ? Just EMAIL me. $20 transfers ($10 for CHL, active military,police,fire or schoolteachers)

Plano, Texas...........the Gun Nut Capitol of Gun Culture, USA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pELwCqz2JfE
dogtown tom is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2018 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.03870 seconds with 10 queries