The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting > Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 10, 2017, 03:06 AM   #1
armoredman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,299
Cast in .223

Not the greatest beginning by any means; well, the picture wouldn't load, don't have all the time to resize it, so picture a steel target in your minds with bullet impact marks with 4 a few inches wide and one flyer about 5 inches down. Lee 55gr cast powder coated at 80 yards from a kneeling braced position, CZ-805 carbine, first load with 18.0gr of H-335/
I'm sure people here can do far better but this is my first effort. First load had a ton of blow by, second was much better. Bore is lead free. Love powder coating.
Anyone here laod cast for .223? Yes, I am on castboolits.gunloads.com.
armoredman is offline  
Old May 10, 2017, 04:23 PM   #2
salvadore
Junior member
 
Join Date: January 1, 2007
Location: Idaho
Posts: 2,282
I started loading cast .223 again. Tried Lee's mold, but gc was hard to seat and cs got all snotty when I called. Ended up with the RCBS. 2400 gave me poor accuracy, but 1680 shows promise. Need more range time, but looks like I may get 1"-2" five shot groups @ 100yds. I believe I am getting 2100-2300fps have to break out the chronograph to make sure. Bullet is mostly linotype over 15grs of powder. No pc...cz527
salvadore is offline  
Old May 10, 2017, 05:18 PM   #3
armoredman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,299
Damn good CZoice of rifle, sir. I was really surprised that this oddball bullet fed without difficulty. I have heard at castboolits.gunloads.com that several people use this slug without gas checks, and when I fired the five with, I experienced no visual leading. Of course, a VERY small sample group, all donated bullets for me to try, from a very gracious member at CB.
Was that Accurate Arms 1680? I use that in 7.62x39mm, tried it in .223 and it was too fast burning for a gas gun, very poor results.
armoredman is offline  
Old May 10, 2017, 05:25 PM   #4
salvadore
Junior member
 
Join Date: January 1, 2007
Location: Idaho
Posts: 2,282
Yes accurate, I used 4227 back when I was using a Ruger #1..very accurate. I understand that pc bullets can end up with uneven application. Is that a consideration?
salvadore is offline  
Old May 12, 2017, 04:56 AM   #5
armoredman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,299
Not really - I'm not going for record, or really long distance, just generally minute of coyote at 100-150 yards.
armoredman is offline  
Old May 12, 2017, 09:00 PM   #6
Chainsaw.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 12, 2015
Location: Issaquah WA. Its a dry rain.
Posts: 1,774
Thanks for you thoughts on casting for 223. Ive been kicking the idea around for a good while, I think you've helped he get a bit closer.
__________________
Just shoot the damn thing.
Chainsaw. is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06174 seconds with 10 queries