![]() |
|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 8, 2006
Posts: 400
|
Is the 400 legend stillborn
You hear nothing about it most new cartridges introduced in the last 20 years the manufacturers would have guns out to test.Barrel makers would be making barrels.For a AR cartridge that use’s available bolts you’d think somebody would have barrels
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2014
Posts: 11,391
|
Be patient--it takes at least a few days to become a legend.
![]()
__________________
"Everyone speaks gun."--Robert O'Neill I am NOT an expert--I do not have any formal experience or certification in firearms use or testing; use any information I post at your own risk! |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 15, 2017
Location: Iowa
Posts: 959
|
I just saw a YouTube video about it yesterday. The factory ammo chronoed at close to advertised velocity, even from a 16 inch barrel (Winchester test barrel was 20”.) It rang an armour steel silhouette like a sledge hammer. The reviewer handloaded some heavier slugs, including a huge 320 or 330 grain flat point hardcast. I think he was getting about 2650 fps out of those. He talked about doing some sub sonic loads with really heavy bullets.
Iowa deer hunters settled on 450 Bushmaster right away, because it was out a year earlier. And it’s accurate, and more than suitable to the task. Last hunting season every farm store was flush with 350 Legend ammo, but 450 was harder to find once the early season sales were over. I have 10mm hand guns and 38-40 rifles, so I’m a fan of the caliber. It might present some angry beast competition to my 458 SOCOM AR. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 20, 2009
Location: Helena, AL
Posts: 4,380
|
Bought a 450 when Bushmaster brought it out. Hornady made dies and cases together with a 250gr FTX bullet made just for it. Shoots 5/8" in 5 shots at 2200fps.
__________________
Reloading For: 223R, 243W, 6.5 GR, 6.5 CM, 260R, 6.5-06, 280R, 7mmRM, 300HAM'R, 308W, 30-06, 338-06, 9mm, 357M, 41M, 44SPL, 44M, 45 ACP, 45 Colt, 450BM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2014
Posts: 11,391
|
Looking at the specs--it actually looks to me like maybe the 400 is what the 350 should have been. Starting at at the get-go with the 6.8 spc case as a parent--that's smart, a tough case which I'm guessing bypasses the unsupported case head/large rim groove silliness the 350 legend had when first rolled out. If they had a trade-in program 350 to 400 I'd do it.
![]()
__________________
"Everyone speaks gun."--Robert O'Neill I am NOT an expert--I do not have any formal experience or certification in firearms use or testing; use any information I post at your own risk! |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 8,109
|
watching
I'm watching the .400 story closely. In a bull session a while back with a shooting pal, we theorized about the lack of a .40 cal rifle cartridge in today's line up and what parent cartridge and platform we would use. None of my ideas are close to the new .400 or it's AR launcher, but Winchester has indeed given us the cartridge.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 8,109
|
names
I gotta tell ya though, the labels attached to these new cartridges....Buckhammer.......Legend, .......... really???????????
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 20, 2007
Posts: 2,357
|
How about Swift, Ultra Magnum, and Nitro Express?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2014
Posts: 11,391
|
Quote:
__________________
"Everyone speaks gun."--Robert O'Neill I am NOT an expert--I do not have any formal experience or certification in firearms use or testing; use any information I post at your own risk! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 8,109
|
nobody asked
The folks naming the new ctgs must have watched to many Marvel superhero movies. Nobody asked, but I would have much preferred .400 AR, .350 AR. For conversations sake, I expect one or the other to survive, but not both. I suppose if I simply abbreviate them to .400L and .350L I can tolerate them.
The industry provides products for profit, and the AR is wildly popular. Makes sense to introduce cartridges for the most popular rifle in the country (OK, one of the most popular). There are specific states that require their geometry, but beyond that, their practicality and nieed for both is debatable. As there is not a contemporary .40 factory "rifle cartridge" existent, the .400L may survive, but I dunno. It may depend on legislation bearing upon AR rifles. The Swift broke 4000 fps first and is a classic. The Nitro Mag family was a product of the propellants of the day. The Ultra Mags, and their dwarf relatives the Short Ultras, were flops. So to were their alphabet soup cousins from Winchester, the WSM, WSSM's. I'm still thinking about the Bee and the Hornet, but I wish I had one of each! Will we be talking about the Legends and the Buckhammer near 100 years from now (age of the Swift) I dunno. Renaming cartridges has been done before, and successfully. I suggest the Legends and the 'Hammer start the paperwork. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 21, 1998
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 4,201
|
Don't know. Theortically, and based on a few actual use reports, the .400L is better overall than the 300Whisper, 350L, 360BH and .450BM. Recall that some states have a max length, as well as straight wall, that nixes the 300W and .450BM.
I have built and tried them all, including a bunch of others, except the 400L. When it came out... ![]() ![]() ![]() IF, ballistics mattered more than marketing, we'd be devoid of about 30 modern cartridges, but we all know that is not the case. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2014
Posts: 11,391
|
I still think the 400L is simply Winchester's correction of what the 350L should of been--in other words they are killing off the 350L themselves.
__________________
"Everyone speaks gun."--Robert O'Neill I am NOT an expert--I do not have any formal experience or certification in firearms use or testing; use any information I post at your own risk! |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,088
|
While there is no reason you have to (they do get paid to make the call) on might have some sympathy for the gun company exec who has to decide WHICH of their products that do overlapping jobs gets the most support.
Knowing that pushing one will hurt or even kill off the other.... The only compromise possible is to allow the passage of time, to entrench one of them enough it will continue to have enough of a following to be commercially viable after the "new" thing comes out. Look how long it took Remington to put out the .260. According to stories, it was intentionally delayed so as not to kill off the 7mm-08. I think it quite likely that had they come out together, or close together, the 7mm-08 would have failed. Remington had their big 7mm Mag (a resounding success) and also the 7mm Express (former .280 Rem) and I think the 260 (6.5mm) on the .308case would have beat out the 7mm-08 for most hunting. Those who felt 7mm was needed, had other (long action) choices. So, the .400 beats the .350? imagine that! ![]() Personally, I don't have an interest in either one, as I'm not restricted to them by game laws, and I'm not a fan of any AR pattern rifle for hunting, but that's just me...
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 1, 2008
Posts: 836
|
Still no rifles produced for the 400 Legend cartridge ..
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,088
|
Aren't "legends" by definition, tales from the past???
![]() "Legend" is not a name to be bestowed on anything when it first comes out. It has to do something, or be something for some time before becoming a "legend". Of course, I don't think they teach marketers proper English. Or, if they ever did, they chose not to use it.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2012
Posts: 6,139
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 21, 1998
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 4,201
|
Savage and Mossberg, between them, have about a dozen models. There are several AR manufacturer's cataloging them as well.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 28, 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 1,580
|
So states pass laws to allow straight walled calibers to harvest deer instead of just slugs and buckshot. Think
357 mag, 44 mag etc. Now these companies come out with all these "new calibers" to push the performance envelope to bottle neck speeds. This may actually cause a reversal of the trend where the use of these new calibers are a problem. |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 21, 1998
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 4,201
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|