![]() |
|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 26, 2013
Location: on the lam
Posts: 1,734
|
Taurus 16 oz 6-shot 2" .38 +P
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 1, 2010
Location: Florida Gulf Coast
Posts: 721
|
I have several 856s in various configurations and all have been accurate and trouble-free.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 22, 2016
Posts: 3,848
|
This isn't a criticism of Taurus, but really the industry as a whole with the extreme light weight (and 16oz isn't the lightest .38 snub out there) .38 snubs when they get too light I'd rather load a lighter bullet with a light load to tame the recoil and by the time I get down to very low recoil loads in a .38, I could have 100gr in .32 Mag instead and the extra round.
The recoil with the .32's could be a bit lighter with a lighter bullet, but 100gr is my preference and expansion isn't impossible if the bullets were built to expand at 925 fps. My issue is, other than Charter Arms, the industry has wholly abandoned the .32 H&R Mag in a double action, instead focusing on .327 Federal in heavier frames built for .357 Magnum.
__________________
"We always think there's gonna be more time... then it runs out."
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2005
Location: Swamp dweller
Posts: 6,180
|
I concur. I would rather a wad cutter verses the +P. IMHO, a much more potent choice. Being it's in a light weight revolver.
__________________
NRA Life Member, NRA Chief Range Safety Officer, NRA Certified Pistol Instructor,, USPSA & Steel Challange NROI Range Officer, ICORE Range Officer, ,MAG 40 Graduate As you are, I once was, As I am, You will be. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: January 30, 2005
Posts: 80
|
Do you have a favorite load that fits this? Looking to feed my S&W 332
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 22, 2016
Posts: 3,848
|
If you don't care about hollow points then it's hard to beat the wadcutter. If you reload you could use Lil' Gun powder, however that would eat the forcing cone and S&W .32 Mags aren't common, so I wouldn't do that to it. For factory low recoil, I believe Hornady is still making the Critical Defense loading that uses an 80gr bullet. It's been proven to expand at 950 fps, so as long as that ammo is close to that velocity out of your 332, it will work.
__________________
"We always think there's gonna be more time... then it runs out."
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: January 30, 2005
Posts: 80
|
Thanks for sharing, I appreciate the info!
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Junior Member
Join Date: June 29, 2023
Posts: 4
|
That is very tame recoil on that video.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|