|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 8, 2021, 01:49 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 7,014
|
US Infantry (Army and Marine) Side Arm Carry
I know the M19/17 is the issue semi auto (I am old school term wise) but I don't find any references to the issue of those to Infantry.
It seems many of the Infantry you see carry a Semi Auto (whatever mfg) but is it standard or a personal choice? I know standard for other troops (but I believe officers are now being shifted to a whatever the service rifle is no a Semi Auto in place of .
__________________
Science and Facts are True whether you believe it or not |
May 8, 2021, 02:50 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2004
Location: Nevada
Posts: 523
|
I believe the "M19" is a fictional handgun from the video game world. See:
https://callofduty.fandom.com/wiki/M19 When it comes to weapons in the military ("infantry"), there are very few personal choices. Semiauto is the standard when it comes to U.S. military handguns; recently shifting from the Beretta M9 to the SIG M17 or M18 depending on branch and unit, with Glock (G19 various gens) being used by some units. For post 1, the 3rd sentence could use some rewriting/rephrasing/editing. ("I know standard for other troops (but I believe officers are now being shifted to a whatever the service rifle is no a Semi Auto in place of .") I can't understand what's being said. Perhaps someone could answer to what extent do various job/functions (e.g. rifleman, doctor, nurse, tank crew, artillery, aircrew, ships, service branch differences, how the mission and at what rank does a unit decide on what weapons to carry on that mission/activity): -qualify with a handgun and at what time interval to requalify (I imagine everyone must qualify annually to always be readily deployable at a moment's notice, but someone please clarify my guesses to this matter) -get issued a handgun and/or when/what circumstances -if qualified/allowed, to what extent is it optional to carry/checkout-from-armory, vs. just carrying the rifle/carbine. Me: I've forgotten more than I remember; spent 5 years in DoD, but was never in the military. In LE, I qualified 2x/year (other depts. might qualify 3 or 4x/year). I qualified with all weapons I was allowed to carry. Only the Glock handgun, G22gen3, later G17gen4, were mandated to carry all-the-time-on-duty, with other weapons might either be mandated or at-my-discretion. Some special weapons (e.g. shotgun, rifle, less-lethal) could be decided upon during a quick meeting/huddle.
__________________
(former) Glock Armorer 1911 Armorer LEO (retired) Last edited by L-2; May 8, 2021 at 03:16 PM. |
May 8, 2021, 06:16 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 8, 2015
Posts: 908
|
BUT "WarDaddy" (Brad Pitt) carried a S&W 1917 as a Sherman commander in the movie "Fury"...I know that the 1917, either S&W or Colt, were general issue but I don't know about the custom Sweetheart grips
|
May 8, 2021, 06:30 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 7,014
|
I know what the general issue is, its who they issue them to?
In this case is it standard issue to infantry? (Army, Mainers or both)
__________________
Science and Facts are True whether you believe it or not |
May 8, 2021, 07:54 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2005
Location: Where the deer and the antelope roam.
Posts: 3,082
|
I was unaware infantry had handguns. I carried a 1911 as an Army MP.
__________________
Retired Law Enforcement U. S. Army Veteran Armorer My rifle and pistol are tools, I am the weapon. |
May 8, 2021, 08:01 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 6, 2011
Location: Thornton, Texas
Posts: 3,998
|
And I carried a 1911 in the Marine MP’s. And 5 bullets. That’s all we were allowed to have.
|
May 8, 2021, 08:40 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 1, 2014
Posts: 725
|
I was Marine Infantry from 89-95, with two years spent in Security Forces (afloat). In MCSF all of us in the actual security detachment carried an M9 w/three mags and one in the pipe as backup to either our M16A2 w/ four mags or M590 w/ twenty-two rounds of 00 Buck and five slugs.
In my regular grunt units, the only M9’s we saw were carried by our Corpsmen and the gunners in a machinegun team, w/two mags each. As for other MOS’s, I can only speak from secondhand word from friends who were MPs, and they carried the M9 with three magazines and one in the pipe also. Beyond that, no impact, no idea. |
May 9, 2021, 01:45 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 20, 2008
Location: Dubuque, Iowa
Posts: 456
|
I'm a retired Infantry Officer. I carried an M4 Carbine and an M9 Beretta with extra mags.
__________________
RetiredMajor, NRA Certified Instructor Every day's a holiday and every meal's a feast! |
May 9, 2021, 01:56 PM | #9 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,839
|
I served in the Army in the 70s (and with the Marines in AIT school) as a Small Arms Repairman (MOS 45B20) and also served as assistant and unit armorer in my duty companies.
Items of equipment change, in this case weapons, but the SOP rarely does or does so slowly. First off, understand that the is a double standard. There is an official set of rules and then there is the flexibility allowed by unit commanders in combat. Who gets what firearm is determined by the unit TO&E (table of organization and equipment) and in garrison (stateside, peacetime, etc) there is damn little deviation allowed. IF the TO&E says 2nd Plt ldr gets a rifle, he gets a rifle, even if he wants a pistol. If it says assistant MG gunner gets a pistol, they get a pistol, which ever one is the current issue standard. When I was in, the pistol was the 1911A1, today its a 9mm. Doesn't change the TO&E (just what name is in the equipment block) Personal (and privately owned) handguns are strictly verboten. This is the standard rule and the one rule most often ignored by COs on the sharp end. Smart commanders allow troops in "indian country" a fair amount of latitude that is not allowed outside of combat areas. SOP for carry (all weapons) outside of actual combat ops was always chamber EMPTY. IF you were caught whith a round in the chamber, you were in for all kinds of crap, possibly up to an Article 15. Again, this is in "secure" areas, and could be different at forward firebases, at the CO's direction. Forget what "Wardaddy" had in a movie, tis a BS movie, not a factual documentary. Be aware that despite the official rules there are a lot of things that happen and the brass just looks the other way, if they see them at all. I knew a senior SSG who carried his own, personal, private, civilian Colt Govt Model. No one ever said a word to him about it. I spotted it because I got a glimpse of the gold Colt medallion on the grip. went and checked, and sure enough the M16A1 that he was supposed to have was still sitting in the arms room rack. Fortunately, I was, at the time, experienced enough to keep my mouth shut. Had I made an issue of it, I'm sure he would have gotten a little crap, but I KNOW i would have caught buckets of it, ...unofficially.. Hopes this helps you get a handle on things. There are the official rules, and there is what troops get away with, and they can be quite different, depending on the local commanders and their attitudes.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
May 10, 2021, 11:08 AM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: May 5, 2021
Posts: 15
|
|
May 10, 2021, 11:11 AM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: May 5, 2021
Posts: 15
|
Not sure. Myself, I've got an Auto Ordinance 1911 which, apparently KAR bought them out, and tried a general search on the serial number to see if it was perhaps a military issue at one time. WWII or Korea?
|
May 10, 2021, 11:44 AM | #12 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,839
|
Quote:
The last large scale purchase orders for 1911A1s were canceled in 1945. WWII production left the military (all branches) with enough 1911A1s to serve in Korea, Viet Nam, and up through the 1980s when they were replaced with 9mms. Essentially, Auto Ordinance didn't start making their 1911A1 pattern guns until about 35-40 years after the US military stopped buying them, so its doubtful your commercial gun ever saw military use.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
May 10, 2021, 12:02 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 12, 2020
Posts: 1,177
|
I have a followup sort of question: how are armaments generally handled in the PMCs? Do they have individual discretion, or is it generally the contractor that dictates the equipment?
|
May 10, 2021, 12:49 PM | #14 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
Quote:
__________________
NRA Life Member / Certified Instructor NRA Chief RSO / CMP RSO 1911 Certified Armorer Jeepaholic |
|
May 10, 2021, 03:29 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 7,014
|
It seems 44 AMP has answered it reasonably clearly.
Again the question was (or maybe should have been) has the Issue TO changed and is a semi auto issued (I am assuming an M-18 for standard) I gather no, but on the pointy end for which I am talking about (which is infantry) wold be they can procure their own and if they do, probably 9mm to match ammo available (or I sure would)
__________________
Science and Facts are True whether you believe it or not |
May 10, 2021, 05:38 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 12, 2020
Posts: 497
|
Real Marines carry Colt M45A1s.
__________________
I use the Jake Brake every chance I get. Don't care if it annoys you. Hear me now?! |
May 10, 2021, 05:46 PM | #17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 4, 2013
Location: Western slope of Colorado
Posts: 3,679
|
Quote:
When i left the contract, i sold that rifle to one of our terps for what i paid. |
|
May 11, 2021, 08:24 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 30, 2011
Location: Savannah TN
Posts: 1,220
|
I have a M17 that was issued to a M240B gunner in B Co, 1/37 101 ABN.
|
May 11, 2021, 08:27 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 12, 2020
Posts: 1,177
|
Sharkbite, TY
|
May 11, 2021, 10:52 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 13, 2005
Posts: 4,700
|
I told my troops when I was in the National Guard, don't bother with personally owned weapons, Uncle Sam won't fix it when it breaks, if something happens to, you have to be medevaced, you can forget about seeing it again.
|
May 14, 2021, 06:08 PM | #21 |
Member
Join Date: April 1, 2016
Location: North Texas
Posts: 72
|
JustJake do they still carry those? I thought I read somewhere they ditched them due to unreliability.
|
May 14, 2021, 07:50 PM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 1, 2014
Posts: 725
|
US Infantry (Army and Marine) Side Arm Carry
Quote:
Not necessarily for reliability… https://www.military.com/kitup/2016/...s-raiders.html And last time I checked, I was a real Marine when I stepped across the parade deck back in ‘89. LOL |
|
May 14, 2021, 08:44 PM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 12, 2020
Posts: 497
|
Quote:
__________________
I use the Jake Brake every chance I get. Don't care if it annoys you. Hear me now?! |
|
May 14, 2021, 09:41 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 1, 2014
Posts: 725
|
|
May 14, 2021, 10:10 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 2, 2013
Location: Tahoe
Posts: 363
|
We provided the guns. Westerners generally got Berettas and M4's. TCNs (Ugandans for us) usually got AK 47s and CZ's. PKMs for machine guns.
All weapons had to be shipped to Iraq/Afghanistan as "temporary" exports. When the contracts were up, the local government stole them. |
|
|