The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 27, 2012, 12:31 AM   #26
Alaska444
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 3, 2010
Posts: 1,231
I LOVE my Marlin .444 as a woods gun and a very accurate hunting rifle that I can shoot 1.5 inch groups at 100 yards with Skinner Peep sights. It weighs about 9.5 pounds with the added lead I had placed in the stock. I added Limbsaver and then covered that with a Kick Killer pad to protect the soft Limbsaver. It is a great gun to shoot, accurate and throws a big chunk of lead. It feels like a 20 ga to me.

If that is not to her taste, then make sure the rifle has a little extra weight, has a Limbsaver and then throw a Kick Killer on top of it and no matter what caliber you choose, it will ease the recoil.

As far as the .270, Jack O'Connor used that as his primary elk rifle. One of my friends in Idaho who has shot dozens of elk over the years uses that combination not just by coincidence. His father was good friends with Jack and learned well from his hunting experiences. So, yes, in the right hands, the .270 is a great rifle for elk.
Alaska444 is offline  
Old January 27, 2012, 02:07 AM   #27
Quincunx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 9, 2005
Location: People's Republic of Maryland
Posts: 421
6.5x55 with 156-160 grain bullets.
__________________
A mind without instruction can no more bear fruit than can a field, however fertile, without cultivation. --- Cicero
Quincunx is offline  
Old January 27, 2012, 02:58 AM   #28
bamaranger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 9, 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 8,295
never

I have never shot an elk, and likely will never get the chance.

Hve done a bunch of reading by those that have. I was thinking .270 as well, based on O/Connor's experience and now many others.

With modern high tech bullets, the .270 is likely more elk rifle than it was in Jack's day, and it seemed plenty good enough then.
bamaranger is offline  
Old January 27, 2012, 04:48 AM   #29
natman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 24, 2008
Posts: 2,605
If she can handle 3-5 shots from a 30-06 at a sitting, what's the problem? How many shots is she going to get at one time at an elk? If a 30-06 is too much, a 270 or a 7mm-08 with 140 grain premium bullets should do nicely.

She should get one of these:

http://www.browning.com/products/cat...cattype=309013

You can buy shirts with a pouch to hold the pad, or it can easily be added to an existing shirt:

http://www.browning.com/products/cat...cattype=301164
natman is offline  
Old January 27, 2012, 05:22 AM   #30
HiBC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 13, 2006
Posts: 8,283
If she can shoot with confidence at the 200 yd limit,that matters a lot.If there is no pressure to "get one",she can wait till a proper rib/heart/lung shot is offered,or pass on the shot.
These "ifs" ,along with a substantial bullet,will be pretty reliable.Once through the ribs,the heart and lungs will soup pretty well.No,honestly I do not have experience shooting elk with a 6mm but I have seen it done with a 243.

On the idea of "She is OK for 3-5 shots with a 30-06"

I am not trying to assign limitations to her,but a concern might be,At what price?I can get down on a bench with a 416 Rem Mag for 3=5 shots,but I won't really enjoy it because it hurts.The danger is if I get the dread squinty eye cringe.Then I have to focus and follow through my way out of it.

I'm saying if she develops a flinch from trying to make a 30--06 work,the 30-06 will be less effective than the 6mm due to shot placement.

IMO,Peetza's 7-08 is a darn good suggestion.Maybe a 140 gr Accubond or Partition.

And,I will add,while a Sako or similar is a fine rifle,I would look very carefully at finding a rifle that fits her well.It may be something like a Ruger Compact or similar rifles would fill the bill.
HiBC is offline  
Old January 27, 2012, 05:26 AM   #31
natman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 24, 2008
Posts: 2,605
I guess it depends on what is meant by "OK".

Quote:
I'm saying if she develops a flinch from trying to make a 30--06 work,the 30-06 will be less effective than the 6mm due to shot placement.
If this is the case then she's NOT OK with the 30-06.
natman is offline  
Old January 27, 2012, 09:21 AM   #32
RevGeo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 18, 2011
Location: North Idaho
Posts: 161
The 6mm will be just fine.

George
RevGeo is offline  
Old January 27, 2012, 09:56 AM   #33
chewie146
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2010
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 853
Try some managed recoil .30-06. They're quite a bit lighter with Remington's being a 125 grain core lokt at around 2650 fps. That's almost 2000 ft lbs of energy. I'm not sure how that little short bullet performs on elk, but core lokts are decent. Also, the 6mm will work with good bullets. Barnes comes to mind, as does Nosler. I've used 270 130 grain cheapo walmart federal specials, and they work just fine if you hit them behind the ear or centerpunch the lungs. Basically, with any lighter caliber, avoid heavy bone, specifically the shoulder bone. Out here in NM, it specifies .24 caliber centerfire or larger. CO has more specific regulations regarding energy, etc. Make sure she can shoot it, but more importantly, make sure you're legal. There are some interesting .30 caliber choices out there now like .30 T/C and .30 Remington AR. Before I get flamed, I must say I don't know the ballistics of these rounds, but they are worth looking at for a lower recoil alternative.
chewie146 is offline  
Old January 27, 2012, 09:58 AM   #34
4winds
Member
 
Join Date: March 25, 2009
Posts: 44
Get one that will fit her!

Quote:
She has her eye on Sako and Weatherby Mark V
She should get what she wants, I love my mark V and the Sako's are dandies!

Since she has a past injury, make sure her LOP, comb to cheek, and most of the heel to shoulder area comes into contact. It sounds like she is lucky to be surrounded by other hunters with rifles. If so, I hope they'll lend her a few to get an idea of a proper fit (she doesn't even have to fire them). Have her pull up the gun to her shoulder and look through the scope, WITHOUT MOVING HER HEAD or leaning into the stock or leaning way back. This alone will improve felt recoil. If she contorts at all, its gonna hurt.

There are so many great guns out there in so many designs she should find one close to fitting her! - DO THIS FIRST, CALIBER NEXT!
4winds is offline  
Old January 27, 2012, 10:00 AM   #35
confirmed shooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 8, 2009
Location: reno, Nv.
Posts: 109
I shoot a 6mm also, so you know that I understand the recoil of that round. I would consider a 308 in the AR platform with a brake. Its 180 gr bullet at 2650 fps has less recoil than my 6mm. hope this was helpfull.
confirmed shooter is offline  
Old January 27, 2012, 10:20 AM   #36
jimbob86
Junior member
 
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,722
Quote:
IMO,Peetza's 7-08 is a darn good suggestion.Maybe a 140 gr Accubond or Partition.
As much a fan of the .270 WIN as I am, I vote 7-08 for the recoil shy..... my niece uses one for deer..... and she's 12. With controlled expansion bullets, I think it'd work just fine.

What weight of bullet is she using in the 6mm now? The original .244 Remingtons had too slow of a twist to stabilize 100 grain bullets .....
jimbob86 is offline  
Old January 27, 2012, 10:33 AM   #37
chewie146
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2010
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 853
If it's a true 6mm and not a .244, she should stabilize 100 grain bullets. At least my 80's vintage gun does. That was the reason for the name change. It basically indicated a twist rate change.
chewie146 is offline  
Old January 27, 2012, 02:46 PM   #38
Irish B
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 10, 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 359
.270 is plenty for elk if you're a decent shot. I learned to hunt Moose and Elk with a .270
__________________
If a man hasn't found something worth dying for, he isn't fit to live
Irish B is offline  
Old January 27, 2012, 06:11 PM   #39
Art Eatman
Staff in Memoriam
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
Checking back with the opening post, I figure he's got enough info to chew over, for now.
Art Eatman is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.09094 seconds with 8 queries