|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 17, 2013, 07:55 PM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 27, 2011
Location: Ohio-Kentucky - florida
Posts: 1,221
|
That is one mean looking AK, SR20! The AK's are more versatile and light, but i still think of the four OP listed, SKS is best value.
This SKS paratrooper and AK47 are about the same size, but a big difference in weight. Paratrooper: AK47: |
December 17, 2013, 08:07 PM | #27 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 17, 2012
Posts: 1,085
|
Quote:
The VZ has a milled receiver and weighs a pound less than an AK unloaded. The gas-system of the VZ is a good 3" shorter than the AK. It's mags are similar to the AK (but with a bolt hold-open track that makes them AK-incompatible) but made from aluminum and are very well built. The factory folding stock is among the most solid-locking side folding stock designs I've seen. The VZ is striker fired, and has a trigger with much take up, but little resistance or roughness. There are companies making everything from furniture, to 922r parts, to AK47 drum conversions, to railed top covers and other scope mounts for the VZ. I'll actually be working on a belt-fed conversion at some point TCB
__________________
"I don't believe that the men of the distant past were any wiser than we are today. But it does seem that their science and technology were able to accomplish much grander things." -- Alex Rosewater |
|
December 17, 2013, 08:32 PM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 18, 2013
Location: closer than you think
Posts: 967
|
1. Mini 30 Best rifle overall. A modern day SKS, but I'm not sure it's worth two SKS's though.
2. SKS If you take your time and find a good example of the SKS it is unquestionably the best value. I'd prefer the type 56( Chinese ) over the Yugo. The type 56 is generally lighter and I've found them to be more accurate. 3. AK My number one choice if money was no object. In my opinion any AK worth buying will cost you as much as a Mini 30 and a SKS combined. The low end $5-700 Ak's I've shot were inferior to my $300 SKS in both accuracy and reliability. If you get a quality AK though they are one of the most reliable weapons ever built. I have no experience with the VZ-58. Boomer
__________________
The number one cause of death in the 20th century. 290,000,000 citizens were first disarmed and then murdered by their own governments. This number does not include those killed in war. We're from the government, we're here to help |
December 18, 2013, 11:11 AM | #29 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2010
Posts: 4,862
|
Quote:
|
|
December 18, 2013, 07:26 PM | #30 |
Member
Join Date: November 26, 2001
Posts: 19
|
Sig 556r is the nicest 762 x 39 platform I have used. I have a MAK90 and an SKS. I have also shot many other aks like century and arsenal.
I like the arsenal slightly better than the MAK90 even though I don't own one. I cannot comment on the new minis. The old ones were reliable but were inside 100 yard rifles. Maybe inside 75 yard rifles. The sig is very accurate. And the gen2 is very reliable. The reality is you really cant go wrong. 7.62 x 39 is so cheap and ABUNDANT. Good luck and BTW this is my ranking... 1 - sig 556r 2 - VZ or arsenal (higher end ak) 3 - MAK90 (mid range ak) 4 - Mini 30 5 - SKS |
December 18, 2013, 09:42 PM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,299
|
|
December 19, 2013, 07:04 AM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 12, 2006
Location: Bucks County , Pa
Posts: 519
|
I like the 7.62x39 round , it was cheap . You could get a SKS a for 150 or less , ammo was 50 bucks for a sealed 1000 rounds ... Those were the days of cheap fun .
I have the SKS in Chinese , Yugo and Russian are nice firearms for what they are , Russian are a nicer firearm . I had a 7.62x39 upper on one of my AR15 and it was ok but just a odd duck , my favorite is the Robinson Arms VEPR ... Seems everyone selling a AK adds the vepr title of there gun sales ... Most are junk . |
December 19, 2013, 11:05 AM | #33 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar. I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin |
||||
December 19, 2013, 12:06 PM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 27, 2011
Location: Ohio-Kentucky - florida
Posts: 1,221
|
I like the gas system and lighter weight of the AK's but the SKS is the overall winner IMO.
I have several variations in stock and modified. Built like a tank/ tough as nails. I just wish I would have taken a good friends advice about them in the '80's. I like most looked at then like cheap surplus junk. Couldn't be more wrong. Except the inexpensive part. They're not cheap. To make a new gun today of same quality would be at least $700 range. |
December 19, 2013, 02:08 PM | #35 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
|
In my opinion, it depends on whether you're a "good shot". If you are and you expect to hit what you aim at, don't expect to be happy with the average mil-surp(Combloc type) semiauto. If you're only a mediocre shot, you may get hits that would have missed with a reasonably accurate rifle since the wibbles and wobbles counteract each other.
In other words, those commie designs are intended to provide a lot of outgoing bullets from poor shots-some of which might hit the enemy. If you get hit, it makes little difference whether the shooter was actually aiming at you or not. |
December 19, 2013, 10:40 PM | #36 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 18, 2013
Location: closer than you think
Posts: 967
|
Quote:
The MAK-90 is equal or inferior to the SKS in almost every way and cost twice as much money. Why pay more and not get more? Boomer
__________________
The number one cause of death in the 20th century. 290,000,000 citizens were first disarmed and then murdered by their own governments. This number does not include those killed in war. We're from the government, we're here to help |
|
December 20, 2013, 02:10 AM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 18, 2008
Location: About 20 nm from the Big Muddy
Posts: 2,887
|
The ones in my family were a used ('03) Mini 30, common Chinese SKS and recently a Yugo M59 SKS in excellent condition-has No gr. launcher.
The only ammo has been Wolf and Monarch. The SKS ergonomics appeal to me much more than any AK clone. Maybe the new Mini 30s have more luck using Russian ammo. Every forty or so rds. a second pin strike was needed. It also had a misfeed about every 40-60 rds., but these were polymer Promags. Various Mini 14 and 30 magazine issues are covered at "Perfectunion". If you somehow decide on the SKS type, you might find the Yugo's 59 series preferable to the longer, very common 59/66. "SKSboards" is a primary source. Last edited by Ignition Override; December 21, 2013 at 01:33 AM. |
December 20, 2013, 03:54 AM | #38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 8, 2010
Location: WISCONSIN
Posts: 283
|
Old December 15, 2013, 11:59 PM #5
Gunplummer Senior Member Join Date: March 11, 2010 Location: South East Pa. Posts: 1,271 As he stated, I love my AR in 7.62X39. I had a Ruger Mini-30, and it was junk. Now please understand, I love the fit, feel, and function of the Mini-14/30 series rifles, BUT the accuracy was terrible. I buy a rifle for accuracy. When a rifle has worse accuracy than a 12 guage rifled slug, its not worth keeping. I had the opportunity to sell my Moni-30 for 3 times what I paid for it, and sold it. I still have a Mini-14 and will keep it because of how it handles. Accuracy at its best is about 5 inches at 100 yards (I've had it since 1976). My AR in 7.62X39 is very accurate even with the surplus Wolf ammo, mainly I feel because it has a 0.310" diameter bore which is properly sized for the Russian ammo. I have over 7000 rounds of ammo originally purchased for $67/1000, sure wish I had purchased a semi load at that price. If you were only shooting the Americanized version of 7.62X39 ammo with a 0.308" diameter projectile, a different properly sized barrel would be required.
__________________
OldmanFCSA = "Oldman" at www.fcsa.org FCSA Member, SCSA Member, NRA Member, & AMA Member "Oldage & Treachery will overcome Youth & Skill" |
December 20, 2013, 02:25 PM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 11,132
|
1. AK47 Polytech, Pre-89 (true pre-ban)
2. New Ruger Mini 30 3. VZ-58/VZ-2008 4. MAK90 Pre-Ban 1994 5. SKS -Yugo That's about how I'd rank them. |
December 20, 2013, 08:51 PM | #40 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 28, 2011
Location: Danville, Pa
Posts: 520
|
i'd say if you want a 7.62x39 the AK is the best option out of anything as everyone already knows how well they are built, operate in any condition and pretty much unbreakable.
I have a bushmaster AR in this chamber which has been very good to me and has never given me any problems. Now that its been out for a few years now, they are getting the magazine situation figured out |
December 21, 2013, 12:28 AM | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 9, 2010
Location: live in a in a house when i'm not in a tent
Posts: 2,483
|
i liked my sks as it was unstoppable like a steam roller.
I have an AR upper in 7.62x39 and I like it as well.
__________________
I'm right about the metric system 3/4 of the time. |
December 21, 2013, 01:38 AM | #42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 18, 2008
Location: About 20 nm from the Big Muddy
Posts: 2,887
|
YankeeIronSights:
On second thought, if your firm objective is to own a rifle in this chambering, but perhaps don't already have a heap, my advice is to order a case(s) of ammo before even buying the rifle. Based on info at "Gunbot", some prices for Russian ammo today are similar to what they were in Sept/October '08. Many of us will never need to 'sweat' the next sudden panic. Last edited by Ignition Override; December 21, 2013 at 01:48 AM. |
December 21, 2013, 12:42 PM | #43 |
Member
Join Date: March 24, 2011
Location: Bella Vista, AR
Posts: 73
|
|
December 21, 2013, 03:49 PM | #44 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 24, 2002
Posts: 589
|
Having had an SKS (and have recommended them to many others) and owned a Norinco preban AK47 (which I regret selling), My opinion is the only 7.62x39 semi auto worth owning now is the SIG, second generation 556R.
|
December 21, 2013, 07:32 PM | #45 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 26, 2004
Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 13,806
|
I had a Yugo SKS and Saiga conversion. If I had to do it over again it would be a VEPR or VZ. I eventually wized up and got an AR.
Why? I can reload for it and don't have to rely on imported ammo which may or may not eventually turn the gun into a paperweight once the ammo gets banned. |
December 22, 2013, 11:16 AM | #46 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2010
Posts: 4,862
|
Quote:
|
|
December 22, 2013, 01:37 PM | #47 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 11,132
|
Quote:
|
|
December 22, 2013, 01:52 PM | #48 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 12, 2005
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 3,336
|
Norinco & Poly Tech stamped receivers are stout.
__________________
The History and Development of the M14 EBR |
December 22, 2013, 06:16 PM | #49 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 18, 2013
Location: closer than you think
Posts: 967
|
Quote:
Boomer
__________________
The number one cause of death in the 20th century. 290,000,000 citizens were first disarmed and then murdered by their own governments. This number does not include those killed in war. We're from the government, we're here to help |
|
December 22, 2013, 09:02 PM | #50 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 24, 2006
Posts: 1,903
|
I went with the CZ VZ58. It locks open on the last round, is light weight and very reliable. It's the only 7.62x39 I own.
|
|
|