|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 24, 2008, 04:50 PM | #51 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 3, 2004
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 129
|
Not trying to be an a**, but I am curious and trying to help the OP along. Is anyone here with direct bear experience comfortable with a pistol at all. How 'bout vs. a shotgun or LC rifle given weight considerations.
|
September 25, 2008, 12:40 AM | #52 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 21, 2008
Location: Back in Wyoming
Posts: 1,125
|
Moloch
You said... "I would feel safe with my Glock 35 .40S&W, the .40 penetrates good and has plenty of power for a handgun, and I can fire it very fast.
But I would rather choose my .454 casull redhawk 8.5''. With a rifle I wouldnt go below .308." I'd take a .308 over ANY pistol, I'd take a .270 over any .40 S&W (look at the reloading data & do the energy math, a .500 S&W loses out to a .308). That high capacity magazine will not do much good when you'd be lucky to get one shot if a bear really decides he wants you. Sometimes I carry a revolver, but if I ever needed a gun and was lucky enough to bring it to bear before the bugger was on me, I'd probably be wishing for a .460 NE to make my one shot REALLY count. Food for thought. |
September 26, 2008, 05:58 PM | #53 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 29, 2007
Posts: 250
|
Springfield V16 Longslide in 45 Super (230g bonded Golden Saber HP at 1150 fps). It's what I bought it for ...
Chuck |
|
|