The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old September 19, 2017, 05:50 PM   #1
Prof Young
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 21, 2007
Location: Illinois - down state
Posts: 2,399
So I have a pound of reloader 15 and . . .

Loaders:
I have a pound of reloader 15 and some 55 gn z max bullets. I found two formulas at handloads.com but can't find much else for that powder with that bullet. Even Alliant doesn't have a formula for that weight.

So my query, is reloader 15 just a bad match for a 55 gn zmax?

Life is good
Prof Young
Prof Young is offline  
Old September 19, 2017, 07:01 PM   #2
surveyor
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 13, 2007
Posts: 770
I would use a slower burn powder with a heavier bullet,
I haven't used re-15 in 223, but my 77 gr loads run varget and that is a similar burn speed.
surveyor is offline  
Old September 19, 2017, 07:03 PM   #3
Stats Shooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 26, 2016
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 1,636
Quote:
So my query, is reloader 15 just a bad match for a 55 gn zmax?
Yes, promptly send them both to me for disposal.

It's similar in burn rate to Varget. A touch faster.
Stats Shooter is offline  
Old September 19, 2017, 09:06 PM   #4
std7mag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 23, 2013
Location: Central Taxylvania..
Posts: 3,609
Lots of guys use RL15 with their 168gr. bullets...

Closest i saw was for a 62gr. Speer FMJ. And the was a compressed load.
std7mag is offline  
Old September 20, 2017, 08:10 AM   #5
HiBC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 13, 2006
Posts: 8,274
RE-15 is one of my stock powers.
I assume you are discussing a 5.56 AR. I will ask what is your barrel twist?
Via reading product reviews,SOME people,not all,claimthat a 75 Gr Hornady BTHP will stabilize from a 9 in twist.I can't tell you. When I had a 9 in twist I used 69 gr bullets with Varget.

But if you have a 1 in 8 or a 1 in 7 twist,the 75 gr Hornady will stabilize for sure.
That bullet is cheaper and has a higher BC than most 77 gr bullets.
And it is a sweet spot with RE-15.See Hornady's AR-15 Match load section in the load book.
I'm not sure if it still is used,but RE-15 was the US Army's powder of choice for the 175 gr 7.62 Nato sniper rounds.
It works very well with 168 gr 308 loads.
Its in the general zone of 4895 and Varget...maybe 4064.
I won't say data is interchangeable,but I have heard RE-15 is the same powder as Norma N-140.Please do not assume that is true.Its not confirmed,as far as I know.

While RE-15 is a good,useful powder,its a mismatch for 55 gr bullets.The lackof data is a clue.Its too slow.
There are many good matches.I don't load 55 grs,but maybe H-335 ??
HiBC is offline  
Old September 20, 2017, 10:41 PM   #6
Prof Young
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 21, 2007
Location: Illinois - down state
Posts: 2,399
Thanks to one and all.

Good advice HiBC. Thanks

Life is good
Prof Young
Prof Young is offline  
Old September 21, 2017, 03:43 AM   #7
NHSHOOTER
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2012
Location: Concord NH
Posts: 1,002
I use RL15 for my 243 pushing 85gr psp so if you would like you can send it to me, I am getting low..
NHSHOOTER is offline  
Old September 21, 2017, 07:29 AM   #8
rebs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 10, 2012
Posts: 3,881
Reloader 15 is my go to powder for 77 gr bullets in my AR. Never tried it with lighter bullets.
rebs is offline  
Old September 21, 2017, 10:29 AM   #9
Prof Young
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 21, 2007
Location: Illinois - down state
Posts: 2,399
Fear not . . .

All of you who have kindly offered to take this pound of RL 15 off my hands have no need to fear.

I ordered some heavier bullets! :-)

Life is good.
Prof Young
Prof Young is offline  
Old September 23, 2017, 10:19 AM   #10
jetinteriorguy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 28, 2013
Posts: 3,152
My experience is the same as REBS. For heavier bullets in my AR it's a tossup between Benchmark and RE15 with just a very narrow edge going to RE15. With the mid weight size bullets 4064 has been excellent.
jetinteriorguy is offline  
Old September 23, 2017, 01:31 PM   #11
hounddawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 1, 2009
Posts: 4,232
on the Hogdon burn rate chart Varget is rated at 101 and RL 15 at 99

http://www.wwpowder.com/PDF/Burn%20R...02015-2016.pdf
__________________
“How do I get to the next level?” Well, you get to the next level by being the first one on the range and the last one to leave.” – Jerry Miculek
hounddawg is offline  
Old September 23, 2017, 09:21 PM   #12
Road_Clam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 21, 2013
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,691
The widely used RL15 load for high power competitions is 24 gr for the 77 gr SMK/ Nos CC. I'm actually at 23.9. It will work good with the lighter 55's but the burn speed of RL15 is a tad slow. I prefer about 25.7 gr of W748 ball powder for my 55 gr gas gun practice loads. Many great powder choices for 55 gr AR loads.
__________________
"To be old an wise you must have been young and stupid"
Road_Clam is offline  
Old September 24, 2017, 04:02 AM   #13
HiBC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 13, 2006
Posts: 8,274
houndawg
Quote:
on the Hogdon burn rate chart Varget is rated at 101 and RL 15 at 99
Burn rate charts are great. I use them. That rate applies under one standard condition. Under a different pressure,the burn rate will vary. Some powders are spikey,some linear.
But you are correct,the powders are very close

When Varget first became available,therewas no published data for 69 gr MK/Nos CC bullets. I decided to try it in my 16 in 1 in 9 Hbar.
I worked up a load using a chrono and diminishing returns .I also contacted Hogdon and Nosler.All three of us agreed within 1/2 gr. From memory,Velocity was 2870,and it grouped on a quarter at 100 yds. Parts bucket franken gun with a used Olympic brand barrel.First AR build.
I also liked the clean burn. BC looked good.

When I built a 1 in 8 rifle,I really wanted Varget to be best with 75/77 gr bullets.I had a good supply.
But real world testing,RE-15 outperformed it. So I stock both.

FWIW,when we decided we wanted a varmint bullet in the heavier range,the 60 gr V ballistic tip was tried. It shines with Benchmark.

But other folks may get different results. :-) Feel free to have different preferences!! Just sharing what I have found.

Last edited by HiBC; September 24, 2017 at 04:31 AM.
HiBC is offline  
Old September 24, 2017, 07:28 AM   #14
hounddawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 1, 2009
Posts: 4,232
HiBC
Quote:
Burn rate charts are great. I use them. That rate applies under one standard condition. Under a different pressure,the burn rate will vary. Some powders are spikey,some linear.
standard load development procedure still applies. I use RL-10X in my .204 and I have never found a "official" load using it and 39 gr SBK's. What I did find was a dozen or so threads where shooters had developed their own and started at the low end of those
__________________
“How do I get to the next level?” Well, you get to the next level by being the first one on the range and the last one to leave.” – Jerry Miculek
hounddawg is offline  
Old September 26, 2017, 12:43 AM   #15
hdwhit
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 22, 2017
Posts: 1,011
Quote:
Prof Young wrote:
So I have a pound of reloader 15 and . . .
a Priest and a Rabbi come in.

No?

I apologize in advance. When I saw the subject line it sounded almost like the set-up for a joke, so I was trying to continue the set-up.

Yes, RL-15 is not a good match for 55 grain bullets. In the published data it doesn't start appearing until you get into the 70 grain class of bullets.

That doesn't mean all hope is lost; just that you've moved into the world of loading a wildcat cartridge. Everything from here on is speculative and in some cases directly contradicts published guidance, so proceed at your own risk.

Burn rate charts are dependent upon the testing protocol and so are of limited use in load development. Again, proceed with caution.

Hodgdon's burn rate chart has RL-15 a bit faster than Winchester 748 and a bit slower than IMR-4895, both of which start at 22.7 grains according to Hornady #9. If you really want to use that pound of powder rather than just going and getting something more suitable (recommended), then look to a consensus starting load around where faster powders and slower powders coincide.

Good luck.
hdwhit is offline  
Old September 26, 2017, 05:02 AM   #16
SARuger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 11, 2014
Location: Blue Ridge Mountains of VA
Posts: 954
I also stock RL15 in 8# kegs, great powder for 30-30, .243, 7mm-08, 308, 30-06. I use a lot of it!
SARuger is offline  
Old September 26, 2017, 05:38 AM   #17
m&p45acp10+1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 3, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 3,930
In .223 Rem I won't use RL15 with less than a 65 grain bullet. It works just dandy fine with 68 to 77 grain bullets. For 55 grain I stick with H335 it works so well I stick with it. IMR 4166 seems to be a better from light to heavy weight powder as far aa consistent results. Though it is far from the best. It gives repeatable results.
__________________
No matter how many times you do it and nothing happens it only takes something going wrong one time to kill you.
m&p45acp10+1 is offline  
Old October 4, 2017, 09:02 AM   #18
Sky Master
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 30, 2009
Posts: 136
I use H335 in .223. RL15 I use with 168 gr in .308. RL15 seems too slow for .223
Plus I have use RL15 in my Hornady Autocharge. Doesn't meter well being a extruded powder
Sky Master is offline  
Old October 4, 2017, 09:27 AM   #19
Marco Califo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 4, 2011
Location: LA (Greater Los Angeles Area)
Posts: 2,586
1:9 twist will stabilize the H HBPT 75 GR.
Per stability calculator and personal experience.
Great.bullet past 500 yards.
__________________
............
Marco Califo is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.09624 seconds with 10 queries