The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old July 19, 2007, 04:21 PM   #1
ZeroJunk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 14, 2006
Location: Browns Summit NC
Posts: 2,589
California Considering Outlawing Lead

California enviornmentalist are wanting to outlaw lead in all hunting ammo including rifles.The Condors are supposedly getting lead poisoning from animal carcasses.Not a huge deal with shotguns,but I don't know what the rifle bullet solution would be.Some say it is just a step to outlaw hunting.
ZeroJunk is offline  
Old July 19, 2007, 06:40 PM   #2
davlandrum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Lane County Oregon
Posts: 2,547
If they outlaw lead, maybe the next step is gunpowder, because it goes bang...

If lead bullets get outlawed, someone will come up with the solution, just like shotgun shells. And they will cost...

I just thought about it and realized there is no lead left in my gut piles, what are they talking about....

Stuff like this makes my head hurt - so illogical, so extremely BS
davlandrum is offline  
Old July 19, 2007, 07:30 PM   #3
Scorch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
Actually, there is already a solution for this problem. Barnes Bullets X-Bullets.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.
But what do I know?
Summit Arms Services
Scorch is offline  
Old July 19, 2007, 07:56 PM   #4
Dirty_Harry
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 11, 2006
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 1,484
Another reason I won't step in that Liberal state
__________________
"The only purpose for a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you never should have laid down."

"I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, and I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other people and I expect the same from them." -John Wayne
Dirty_Harry is offline  
Old July 19, 2007, 10:41 PM   #5
jrothWA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 11, 2006
Posts: 2,519
That's why Barnes...

came out with an all copper slug.
Here is Washington, you can't hunt with shotgun, west of Cascades with lead, east no problem.
jrothWA is offline  
Old July 19, 2007, 10:44 PM   #6
MDman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 19, 2007
Location: maryland
Posts: 535
hmm maybe they will let you trade in your lead bullets for some nice steel or tungsten ones.
__________________
I dont have super powers, I have guns.
MDman is offline  
Old July 20, 2007, 04:50 AM   #7
Jack O'Conner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 11, 2005
Location: Manatee County, Florida
Posts: 1,976
California Assembly members from heavily urbanized districts have been against all hunting for several decades. In contrast, nearly all of northern California has no such nonsense.

Kenya stopped hunting in the late 1970's. The result was an immediate reduction of Wardens and the area became a free-for-all snaring and trapping bonanza for locals. Yet some animals destroyed their own habitat due to overpopulation. Game has suffered to this day.

Eventually this will occur in California. The Do-Gooders will stop hunting with their votes and pens, but nothing will stop the locals from hunting. Certainly not Wardens because they'll be un-employed.

During the height of Soviet power: hunting, trapping, and snaring cont'd behind the Iron Curtain. The Commies could not stop it and neither will the California Assembly.

Look for a veto from Arnold S.

Jack
__________________
Fire up the grill! Deer hunting IS NOT catch and release.
Jack O'Conner is offline  
Old July 20, 2007, 11:04 AM   #8
Art Eatman
Staff in Memoriam
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
It's purely an anti-hunting deal. No way it can be real, since the deer carcass get hauled home to be butchered and the condors/buzzards/coyotes only get the gutpile to play with. It's very, very rare that any lead could be in the gutpile at all.

But it's California...

Art
Art Eatman is offline  
Old July 20, 2007, 12:40 PM   #9
davlandrum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Lane County Oregon
Posts: 2,547
Oregon has passed some laws due to the bulk of the population being urban (Portland metro and the Eugene area). That is how running dogs for bear and cougar got outlawed. Not sure how the rest of the state can have a say when the population is so out of balance. Laws were against the advice of state F&W biologists - but what do they know...
davlandrum is offline  
Old July 20, 2007, 01:19 PM   #10
Wild Bill Bucks
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 28, 2005
Location: Southeastern Oklahoma, Next door to Sasquatch
Posts: 1,266
Looks like they would figure out, that voteing on things like hunting, should be done by county rather than state wide. We have the same problem here in Oklahoma. 90% of the population is living in 2 or 3 cities, and for the most part don't understand hunting. When elections are held, the rest of us just have to live with whatever the urbanites decide is best.
I live in a 5 county area where 90% of the land is farm land and wilderness and only 80,00 people for population. Most everyone hunts and fishes in these 5 counties, but we are all having to live with laws that the people in OKC and Tulsa vote for( No I'm not knocking my fellow Oklahomans)

Just seems like there should be a better way.
Wild Bill Bucks is offline  
Old July 20, 2007, 04:54 PM   #11
FirstFreedom
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 31, 2004
Location: The Toll Road State, U.S.A.
Posts: 12,451
Buy stock in tungsten & bismuth companies, folks!

I'm for protecting the environment as much or more than the next guy, and if lead's a problem, it's a problem which needs to be dealt with. But it seems to me at first glance that the appropriate solution may not be to ban lead, but rather to impose a special tax on any ammo which uses lead (rather than copper, nickel, tungsten, etc., only), then place directly into a rainy day fund, to first STUDY the issue to see if a ban is warranted or not (to eliminate junk science), or if use of the fund to do certain aquatic cleanup projects (and similar) on as as-needed basis is a better solution. If the studies conclude there is no problem, then nix the tax.
FirstFreedom is offline  
Old July 22, 2007, 09:16 AM   #12
38splfan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 19, 2004
Location: Ft. Lewis/Tacoma, WA.
Posts: 1,034
Washington.

Quote:
Here is Washington, you can't hunt with shotgun, west of Cascades with lead, east no problem.
+1
Wish they would split the stupid state in half and have two, like the Carolinas or Dakotas.

Quote:
During the height of Soviet power: hunting, trapping, and snaring cont'd behind the Iron Curtain. The Commies could not stop it and neither will the California Assembly.
Too bad Cali can't take a hint. If the real commies couldn't do it, the phoney wanna-be's don't stand a chance.
__________________
"I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, and I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to others and I expect the same from them." - John Wayne
38splfan is offline  
Old July 22, 2007, 10:41 AM   #13
Crosshair
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 16, 2004
Location: Grand Forks, ND
Posts: 5,333
38splfan

Too bad Cali can't take a hint. If the real commies couldn't do it, the phoney wanna-be's don't stand a chance.

Hmmm, I might have to save that one. What sounds better, Wanna-be Comie or Comie wanna-be?
__________________
I don't carry a gun to go looking for trouble, I carry a gun in case trouble finds me.
Crosshair is offline  
Old July 22, 2007, 12:56 PM   #14
stinger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 6, 2001
Location: west texas
Posts: 772
See, this is the problem with giving the government so much power. We think they are going to use it for good (because I'm sure, what, 6 kids got lead poisoning from eating paint chips) and then they turn around and use it against us.
stinger is offline  
Old July 24, 2007, 07:04 PM   #15
mrawesome22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 9, 2005
Location: Ohio, Appalachia's foothills.
Posts: 3,779
Is there any way to get Kalifornistan booted from the Union? I'd be whole heartidly for it
mrawesome22 is offline  
Old July 24, 2007, 09:35 PM   #16
Barber2678
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 22, 2006
Location: Mud Creek, Texas
Posts: 269
The condor excuse is a load of crap. If the birds were to eat 100 lead slugs a day it would not hurt them because it is not in a digestible form, it would just pass through. Lead has to be dissolved in water before it can do any harm and it has to be in huge amounts. People need to get educated before they get excited. Everyone in the state would have to shoot 1000 rounds a day for years before there would ever be any evidence if ground water contamination.

Some Kalifornians need to get with the program.
__________________
When in doubt ..... mumble!
Barber2678 is offline  
Old July 24, 2007, 11:19 PM   #17
JWT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 16, 2007
Location: Southern Arizona
Posts: 3,888
Lead bullets and the condor are just like the spotted owl, pigmy owl, etc. - a way for activists to get what they want under the guise of protecting a vanishing species.
JWT is offline  
Old July 25, 2007, 04:25 PM   #18
roy reali
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 23, 2005
Posts: 3,248
YUP!

California laws ain't so bad!
roy reali is offline  
Old July 25, 2007, 04:39 PM   #19
teeroux
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 12, 2006
Posts: 1,512
yes they are bad

they think they rule the union in CA thats why i have to drive an emissions friendly truck.
teeroux is offline  
Old July 29, 2007, 01:25 PM   #20
Paul B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 28, 1999
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,802
"The condor excuse is a load of crap. If the birds were to eat 100 lead slugs a day it would not hurt them because it is not in a digestible form, it would just pass through."

I believe this may be in error. With most creatures, I would agree with you, but the Condors, like other bird holds their food in the crop as an aid to digestion. I think that they found the lead in the crops of the dead Condors, just like the lead they found in the crops of, IIRC, six dead loons which brought about the lead shot ban for migratory waterfowl.
Paul B.
__________________
COMPROMISE IS NOT AN OPTION!
Paul B. is offline  
Old August 8, 2007, 02:54 PM   #21
KEN K
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 7, 2006
Location: mid west Georgia
Posts: 102
lead is poison

You know lead is poisonous to wildlife, I know from first hand experiance, in fact every dear I ever ate had died from lead poisoning. Sounds like the can't get our guns so they're going for the ammo. The X bullet is a good alturnative all copper but I don't know were to get it for reloading.
KEN K is offline  
Old August 9, 2007, 04:23 PM   #22
Omega blood
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 7, 2005
Posts: 161
I doubt that they will make hunting illegal. There is too much revenue coming in from licences, stamps and tags. And as was mentioned before hunting will still continue by locals and carrying capacities will be exceeded.
Omega blood is offline  
Old August 9, 2007, 06:42 PM   #23
Scorch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
Quote:
Lead has to be dissolved in water before it can do any harm and it has to be in huge amounts. People need to get educated before they get excited
Possibly, but I know of no better way to dissolve it than to grind it up and soak it in acid, like in something's stomach.

We could try an experiment. Have your blood lead level tested. Swallow a 30 cal bullet. Two days later, get your blood lead level tested again.

But you're right, people need to get educated. Facts, not hearsay.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.
But what do I know?
Summit Arms Services
Scorch is offline  
Old August 9, 2007, 06:57 PM   #24
ZeroJunk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 14, 2006
Location: Browns Summit NC
Posts: 2,589
You can do a Google on "California Condor Lead" and there are multiple sources indicating that the condors do have lead poisoning and that it is reasonable to assume some of it is coming from shot and bullets.I don't see that it would be a big inconvenience to use solid copper bullets and lead free shot.Might be better to do that preemptive than have some total anti-hunting crusade activated by it.
ZeroJunk is offline  
Old August 9, 2007, 09:42 PM   #25
Crosshair
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 16, 2004
Location: Grand Forks, ND
Posts: 5,333
Hmmm, looks like we need to legalize steel core bullets again. "It's for the environment."
__________________
I don't carry a gun to go looking for trouble, I carry a gun in case trouble finds me.
Crosshair is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.09587 seconds with 10 queries