August 1, 2019, 09:34 AM | #51 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,543
|
Quote:
Easy to see why you shouldn't use unconfirmed load "recipes" off the www. |
|
August 1, 2019, 10:57 AM | #52 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,846
|
Quote:
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
August 1, 2019, 05:45 PM | #53 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 23, 2005
Location: US
Posts: 3,657
|
Jim I caught that too. My math tells me .00446 although he’s mostly correct if he moves the decimal 3 spaces left. I wanted a little head clearance. .005 is plenty. Actually a smidge more than I really want but holy cow I’m not shooting the rifle in bench rest comps. And smoothness/reliability is more the goal not tiny groups. Let me hit the 20” gong with irons at 500 and I’ll be tickled.
__________________
Support the NRA-ILA Auction, ends 03/09/2018 https://thefiringline.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=593946 |
August 2, 2019, 12:31 PM | #54 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Posts: 7,249
|
Quote:
F. Guffey |
|
August 2, 2019, 10:34 PM | #55 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Posts: 7,249
|
Quote:
Quote:
I use a height gage when measuring the height of the die above the press. I go straight to thousandths. And I have another choice, I can back the die whole measuring the gap between the die and shell holder with a feeler gage. Always left out when lowering the die, there is a good chance lowering the die will not work with the feeler gage (for me) because of the cases ability to resist sizing. F. Guffey |
||
August 2, 2019, 11:12 PM | #56 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 23, 2005
Location: US
Posts: 3,657
|
Quote:
__________________
Support the NRA-ILA Auction, ends 03/09/2018 https://thefiringline.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=593946 |
|
August 3, 2019, 12:19 PM | #57 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Posts: 7,249
|
Quote:
Again, a shooter just west of Ft. Worth, TX was interested in cases for his Japanese rifle. I contacted him off line to offer help. I had no ideal how much clearance his rifle had with minimum length/full length sized, over the counter factory loaded ammo; so I formed cases for his rifle that measured field reject length, no go-gage length, go-gage length and minimum length/full length sized cases, after forming and sizing I mailed 80 cases to him with instructions. The minimum length/full length sized cases should chamber without resistance, the go-gage length cases should chamber with a slight resistance to bolt closing and the no go-gage length cases should not allow the bolt to close. The field reject length cases should not allow the bolt to close. As luck would have it the minimum length/full length sized cases allowed the bolt to close and the go-gage length cases allowed the bolt to close with a slight resistance to closing. At that time I suggested he sized the no go-gage length cases to minimum length from the shoulder to the case head and then check the length of the case from the end of the neck to the case head; the same advise applied to the field reject length cases. He had to trim the neck of the cases that were formed to field reject length. He came for a visit at the next gun show, he had additional questions about other matters. He did not get all of his answers from one individual. F. Guffey |
|
|
|