|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 2, 2010, 07:23 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 6, 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 761
|
Traveling through NY/NJ using FOPA
This weekend the family and I will be traveling to PA where I also have a permit along with CT. In transit I will have to comply with 926A (FOPA) while passing through the between states.
I was just wondering, has anyone here ever actually had any problems with local or state LEO in transit anywhere? For example an arrest, or just a hassle while legally complying with the federal law. I hear about the possiblity, but I've never actually heard a firsthand account. I would think it to be rare. I mean, even if you were pulled over for something, there would be no reason to search your vehicle. Just curious. Have a nice 4th of July weekend.
__________________
"I assert that nothing ever comes to pass without a cause." Jonathan Edwards |
July 2, 2010, 07:47 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: June 1, 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 35
|
I cant speak for NY, but im in NJ.
Bringing guns through NJ is generally risky, but you are protected by 926A. Just make sure you have the gun unloaded and securely cased in your trunk. Do NOT carry any loaded magazines in the car. On 4th of July weekend the State Police are usually out in full force on the N.J. Turnpike/G.S. Parkway/Interstates. Just watch your speed and stay in the middle lane and you wont really have anything to worry about. Last edited by Pinelands; July 2, 2010 at 02:36 PM. |
July 2, 2010, 09:31 AM | #3 | |
Junior member
Join Date: January 25, 2006
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
Posts: 1,719
|
Quote:
To the OP.... IF you are stopped by LEO and LEO asks if you have firearms, the way I would answer is: "I am transporting firearms that are unloaded and locked in the trunk [or if you don't have a trunk, locked in a secure container] in accordance with Federal law." If the LEO asks if he can inspect them or search the areas, the answer is NO. Regardless of what the LEO threatens to do, the answer is always NO. Force LEO to get a valid, written search warrant. I don't think you will have problems if you just drive carefully, though. |
|
July 2, 2010, 09:36 AM | #4 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
I assume that you'll be passing through LOWER NY, since you mention Jersey. Upstate, you would be very unlikely to have any problems. Downstate, is a whole 'nother animal.
Of course, "problems" implies that you would be stopped by police for some reason. As stated above, keep to yourself and don't draw attention, you probably have 1000:1 odds of getting pulled over, and far less of them searching your vehicle.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
July 2, 2010, 10:50 AM | #5 | |
Member
Join Date: June 1, 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 35
|
Quote:
Last edited by Pinelands; July 2, 2010 at 02:49 PM. |
|
July 2, 2010, 02:27 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: June 1, 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 35
|
I just checked the state police website and it doesn't mention anything about requiring ammo and firearm in separate cases. Only that both be kept inaccessible from the passenger compartment.
http://www.state.nj.us/njsp/about/fire_trans.html All firearms transported through the State of New Jersey: The following guidelines are provided in order to assist law enforcement officers in applying New Jersey's firearms laws to persons who are transporting firearms through the State of New Jersey. 1. New Jersey laws governing firearms permits, purchaser identification cards, registration and licenses do not apply to a person who is transporting the firearm through this State if that person is transporting the firearm in a manner permitted by federal law, 18 U.S.C.A. 926A. 2. This federal law permitting interstate transportation of a firearm applies only if all of the following requirements are met: A. The person's possession of the firearm was lawful in the state in which the journey began; B. The person's possession of the firearm will be lawful in the state in which the journey will end; C. The person is transporting the firearm for lawful purpose D. The firearm is unloaded E. The firearm is not directly accessible from the passenger compartment of the vehicle F. The ammunition is not directly accessible from the passenger compartment of the vehicle G. If the vehicle does not have a compartment separate from the passenger compartment, the firearm and ammunition must be in a locked container other than the vehicle's glove compartment or console; Last edited by Pinelands; July 2, 2010 at 02:48 PM. |
July 3, 2010, 08:44 AM | #7 | ||
Junior member
Join Date: January 25, 2006
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
Posts: 1,719
|
Quote:
18 USC 926a: Quote:
|
||
July 3, 2010, 06:39 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 1, 2006
Location: Brookville, PA
Posts: 442
|
NY State has been know to ignore FOPA at times, so make sure you abide by traffic laws so they no reason to pull you over.
|
July 4, 2010, 02:43 AM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 16, 2007
Posts: 2,153
|
Quote:
|
|
July 4, 2010, 07:12 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 21, 2005
Location: Sarasota (sort of) Florida
Posts: 1,296
|
People have been arrested in NYC and NY Port Authority jurisdictions violating FOPA.
NYC has been cited by the Federal Courts for violating FOPA, They have been sued and lost. Which takes years. They do not care. If a LEO in NYC finds a gun in your car you're getting new jewlery. Don't speed, don't stop and never let them search your car. Have a good trip AFS |
July 4, 2010, 10:49 PM | #11 |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,467
|
Compare posts #6 and #7. It was the intention for NJ to reproduce the exact requirements of the FOPA. However, in their Item 'G' they goofed. The FOPA says that the firearm "OR" the ammunition must be in a locked container (if the vehicle doesn't have a trunk -- i.e. an SUV, station wagon, or perhaps a pickup if you don't want your guns rattling around in the back). NJ says the firearm "AND" the ammo must be in a locked container. When I transited NJ some years ago, I had multiple firearms and ammo for all. I had the handguns in one locked case, the long guns in another locked case, and the ammo in an old computer tool case to which I attached a hasp and a cheap padlock.
I also made certain to take the Garden State Parkway and go around NYC rather than follow I-95 straight through. I don't know if White Plains is any better than the NYPD, but I figured they certainly couldn't be any worse. Also, I carried multiple printed copies of both the FOPA and the NJ advisory, just in case. Thankfully, nothing happened and I didn't need them. |
July 5, 2010, 01:44 AM | #12 | |
Junior member
Join Date: January 25, 2006
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
Posts: 1,719
|
Quote:
"and neither the firearm nor any ammunition being transported is readily accessible" that phrase in FOPA applies whether or not the vehicle has a trunk or exterior compartment. The phrase, "the firearm or ammunition shall be contained in a locked container" applies to both the firearm and ammunition if they are both being carried at the same time. Both the firearm and the ammunition need to be in a locked container or locked in an exterior compartment of the vehicle. Neither the ammunition nor the firearm may be accessible to the passengers/driver. FOPA is optional....one can transport firearms either according to state law applicable to the state they are physically located in; or, if traveling through a state that is not their destination, they may transport firearms according to FOPA. |
|
July 5, 2010, 09:14 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 4, 2007
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 229
|
Port Authority police arrested an interstate traveler at Newark Airport. Charges against him were eventually dismissed, but he lost his civil rights lawsuit, as well as the appeal.
http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case...9&s=NJ&d=43309 Bottom line, the interpretations of the protections under FOPA are very narrowly construed. As a matter of court practice, in the absence of a clear violation on the arresting officer's part, the courts will generally defer to the officer's discretion. Even though not all police are Port Authority, their actions typically represent the hostile attitudes of police in the NJ/NY areas (in my experience, at least). So be warned: police in NJ/NY are not your friends; they can arrest for even the most minor deviation outside the protection of law. Police in NJ/NY have also ignored federal protections (particularly at La Guardia Airport). I don't know about NY, but NJ has no statutory requirement to let an officer know that you have firearms in the car during a traffic stop; it also cannot be used against you that you don't declare it. If they want to arrest you for something, they will. My advice is to invoke your right to an attorney early, and don't consent to anything without speaking to one.
__________________
I'm not afraid of the guy who wants many guns; I'm afraid of the guy who wants just one. |
July 5, 2010, 09:52 AM | #14 | |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Quote:
Upstate police are regular people, by and large.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
|
July 5, 2010, 10:41 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Alabama
Posts: 175
|
I have an old Army buddy of mine who lives in N.J. He bought a Harley Electraglide at Police Auction in downtown Trenton. On the way home from the auction, he got pulled over for having the front headlight out. He said it worked in the parking lot, but evidently, it had stopped working. He and the cop are BS'ing about motorcycles while my buddy pulls the seat off the bike to look at the fuse. Under the seat, there's a VERY rusted up, but loaded, .22 mouse gun.
He spent over two weeks in jail, lost his job for not showing up to work, before he was released on bail his father had to put up for him. Almost 14 months later, he finally got his day in court. With all of his paperwork, his attorney AND sworn statements from the auction house and, he found the cop who had originally arrested the owner of the bike on drug charges and had him write a statement about the bike not being searched any further than the bags on it, he was STILL fined over $1500 for having a concealed weapon, but no jail time or probation was assigned. There's just something jacked up with this Nation when this type of thread is required. Personally, I won't travel up that way. Even though my Father-In-Law lives in Fairfield, CT. I refuse to go into any State that has bastardized our Constitution and our Bill of Rights the way they have. Of course, I understand some folks have to anyway. I'm just saying how absolutely jacked up it is to have to put this much planning and worry into something.
__________________
Only a biker knows why a dog sticks his head out the window. -Unkown "A government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take away everything you have." -Thomas Jefferson |
July 5, 2010, 05:38 PM | #16 | |||
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,467
|
Quote:
FOPA: Quote:
Quote:
Nonetheless, I would (and did) lock both, in separate containers, just to keep NJ happy. |
|||
July 5, 2010, 05:51 PM | #17 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 25, 2006
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
Posts: 1,719
|
It does not make any sense at all that with a vehicle with a trunk, both the ammo and the firearm would have to be in the trunk, but with a vehicle without a trunk, only the ammo OR the firearm would have to be locked up.
According to your interpretation, a person could have a gun in their lap, so long as the ammo was locked in a box, in an SUV. But if the vehicle was a sedan, both the gun and the ammo would have to be in the trunk. Laws often don't make sense - but that interpretation goes beyond just not making sense. FOPA requires both the ammo and the firearm to be inaccessible to the occupants of the vehicle. Period. But, to each his own. Hopefully you won't be the one asking the courts to interpret it. |
July 5, 2010, 09:55 PM | #18 | ||
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,467
|
To repeat the pertinent part of the FOPA citation:
Quote:
Quote:
However, my initial point (several posts up) was that NJ changed "or" to "and," so for travel through NJ your understanding of the law is the only one that would work. (Except for that pesky clause in the FOPA that says 'the laws of any state notwithstanding," or however they phrased it. I would not want to argue that point with a NJ trooper on the side of the NJ Tpke.)) Last edited by Aguila Blanca; July 5, 2010 at 10:01 PM. |
||
July 5, 2010, 10:14 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 6, 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 761
|
Just got back to CT a few minutes ago BTW. No problems in NY or NJ. Looks like there's been some fighting on this thread while we've been gone.
__________________
"I assert that nothing ever comes to pass without a cause." Jonathan Edwards |
July 5, 2010, 10:48 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 26, 2004
Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 13,806
|
Amazes me that some states could care less if you have a firearm in the vehicle, while others demonize it like they're rattlesnakes ready to strike. Never will understand how geography changes that line of thought.
|
|
|