|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 4, 2009, 09:53 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 27, 2009
Location: SC
Posts: 200
|
38 Bevel Base WC Verse Hollow Base
I have (100) .358" 148 grain bevel base WC I'd like to load for my 38 Special. The only information I can find on this bullet is in an older Speer manual.
Starting and max for Unique load is 4.5/5.1 Starting and max for Bullseye load is 3.9/4.5 This seems high as the staring and max loads in the same manual for the hollow base WC: Bullseye 2.8/3.1 In the new Lee manual the max loads looks like 2.7 for Bullseye. My questions is why so much difference in the load data for bevel base verse hollow base? |
July 4, 2009, 03:32 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 2, 2007
Location: Wake County, N. Carolina
Posts: 379
|
Hollow base vs. Bevel base
Hollow base wad-cutters are only meant for velocities up to around 800 fps. If you push them harder the bullet will possibly separate leaving the torn off skirt in the barrel. You can picture what happens next. Mechanically the skirt is expanded from pressure and grips the barrel so tight that the heavier front of the bullet tears off the hollow base or skirt.
Bevel base wad-cutters can take more velocity as they don't have a skirt to separate. These can be driven at the same velocity as the hollow base design up to probably 1000 fps , if the lead is hard enough. All the Best, D. White |
July 6, 2009, 04:39 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 27, 2009
Location: SC
Posts: 200
|
Thanks D, makes some sense now. It just looked like a big difference in charge.
|
July 6, 2009, 04:50 PM | #4 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,060
|
Welcome to the forum.
It is a big difference. Only the maximum should change, as you can fire BBWC's and DEWC's and Lee Tumble Lube WC's all with the same time-honored 2.7 grains of Bullseye target load as a swaged HBWC uses. But as D. White says, you can optionally run the solids faster. That goes double for a cast bullet, since it is harder than a swaged one. In .357 cases the solid cast WC's leave enough powder room to make quite an effective game stopper/defense load using that wide, blunt nose. The Lee cast Tumble Lube design is far more accurate in my .38's than any other wadcutter I have purchased, cast, or fired. In my K-frame Smith it cuts group size in half. So if you decide to get into casting your own, that's the one I would point to. In the 6-cavity mold production is fairly fast.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|