|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 28, 2013, 01:14 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 3, 2011
Location: Austria
Posts: 758
|
bottleneck cartridges - different form, different performance?
A general question concerning bottlenecked ammunition: Is there any correlation between the form of a bottleneck cartridge and its performance? What I mean is when you have a cartridge of one given caliber and internal volume, you could either make it long and slim (like, say, a .22 wmr), or slightly bottlenecked (like a .223) or quite fat on the bottom (like 6mm PPC). A last possible variation would be conical, of course.
Would there be any difference in terms of the internal ballistics and performance or is it merely a matter of sizing / mag feeding etc.?
__________________
"Get off of my lawn!" Walt Kowalski . ISSC PAR .223 |
October 28, 2013, 01:48 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
|
It's pretty well established that shorter, fatter cases for a with sharper shoulder angles and longer necks for a given caliber produce both better accuracy and longer barrel lives.
There are, of course, exceptions, but the above's a pretty good rule of thumb. |
October 28, 2013, 01:50 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Rainbow City, Alabama
Posts: 7,167
|
Bart has it right. That is part of the reason for the recent increase in the number of short and super short magnums. Greater velocity with less powder due to a more efficient burn.
|
October 28, 2013, 02:13 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 3, 2011
Location: Austria
Posts: 758
|
ah, I see. There has never been one single question not satisfactory answered in this forum!
So they only reason why not going super short and fatty is magazine stacking, I reckon?
__________________
"Get off of my lawn!" Walt Kowalski . ISSC PAR .223 |
October 28, 2013, 02:24 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,809
|
If you get carried away with too short and too fat feeding can become an issue as can mag capacity. Some of the 1st WSM guns had a few issues until manufacturers figured it out. Part of the reason for the WSSM's failing is due to feeding issues.
|
October 28, 2013, 03:49 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
|
There was a very popular bolt action rifle that when offered in .308 Win., those shorter, fatter cases didn't feed as reliably as the more tapered bodies on the .30-06, .270 Win and .25-06. I don't know if Remington ever fixed that problem with their Model 700's and 40X's.
|
October 28, 2013, 08:45 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2012
Posts: 6,165
|
Short and fat is supposed to be more accurate than skinny and long. Brass definitely lasts longer on the fat boys. I remember reading something one of the designers of Safari rifles wrote about 70 or 80 years ago. He said the only reason they put so much taper on the cartridges was to assure that the cases would not stick in the double rifles when fired on extremely hot days. Dont know how true that is, but it sounds logical to me.
|
October 31, 2013, 03:55 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 11, 2007
Posts: 2,155
|
There is two types of accuracy one is a factory rifle which most own others are the custom.
If you build a 300WSM for hunting then build a 300mag or 30-06 accuracy be the same. If you look at a match rifle build in 300WSM it's fired single shot most times build on single shot action. No question some of the WSM use less powder but there very limited in bullet selection due to the magazine length. Lot of the short cases are great just with one type bullet so there always trade-off's.
__________________
Semper Fi Vietnam 1965 VFW Life member NRA Life Member |
October 31, 2013, 11:29 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 4, 1999
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,889
|
Personally I do not care for the short, fat cartridges. A major reason is the reduced magazine capacity, but I admit I have never used one.
If you are a hunter and not a competition shooter the barrel life should not be a problem. I never worried about barrel life. By the time I would wear the barrel out I would have spent much more for ammo even if handloads. Jerry
__________________
Ecclesiastes 12:13 ¶Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man. 14 For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil. |
October 31, 2013, 11:33 AM | #10 | |
Junior member
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,722
|
Quote:
Of all the rifles I have, the one I shoot most should be the one I hunt with, and vice versa .... |
|
October 31, 2013, 12:43 PM | #11 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 21, 2012
Location: Woodhaven MI
Posts: 477
|
So the Weatherby double radius shoulder design is more efficient than that of say a 300 win mag? I always thought Weatherby cartridges were all about case capacity but it looks like Mr. Weatherby did his homework.
|
October 31, 2013, 01:01 PM | #12 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,839
|
Quote:
Benchrest shooters showed the way, shorter, fatter powder columns do overall, provide better accuracy. Very important in winning a match. Fairly important when shooting varmits and other precision uses. Not very critical when the main task is stopping an upset buffalo at 15 yards. Unless the shorter fatter round doesn't feed or extract well, then at 15yds, it would be hyper critical!
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
October 31, 2013, 09:49 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 11, 2007
Posts: 2,155
|
There lot of case in short yardage BR that are not SAAMI spec 6ppc,30Br and others. F-Class open is the 284 Shehane and if you look at the 284 it's long throated and your getting 2900fps appr with 180gr bullets. Also your not going to wallk in and buy ammo for them.
__________________
Semper Fi Vietnam 1965 VFW Life member NRA Life Member |
November 1, 2013, 12:16 AM | #14 |
Member
Join Date: September 23, 2013
Location: Oregon
Posts: 52
|
Some people hate the .300 win mag for some reason or another. I dont know I dont reload. However I can hit a 15" steel plate at 1k with it all day long. I think the manufacturing companies are just trying gimicks to get peoples money from them anymore. Just my two cents. However I am probably wrong.
I had me one of those 243 WSSM's and i hated it i could never find ammo for the stupid thing. So i traded it off for a few SKS's. |
November 1, 2013, 07:14 AM | #15 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
|
This subject is the basis of some VERY heated arguments among the wildcatters. In some cases, it's more like a woman's looks-some are attractive in different ways.
|
November 1, 2013, 02:47 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
|
Regarding case extracting issues with 375 and larger caliber cases from chambers in British dangerous game rifles a century ago, they all had a few ten-thousandth inch or more clearance from the chamber walls and needed little force to pull the fired cases out. That was/is assured by peak pressures being less than 40,000 cup, not case design.
Some magnum Mauser actions were deep enough to extend below the stock half an inch or so to hold more fat cartridges. The steel in the rifles wasn't as strong an hard a modern rifles but made intricate detailed engraving much easier. Last edited by Bart B.; November 1, 2013 at 03:07 PM. |
November 1, 2013, 03:07 PM | #17 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
I am sure all the above is accurate and that the posters are truthful.
But I still think there are a bunch of guys at the gun/cartridge companies who sit around and say things like, "What kind of silly gun/cartridge can we come up with this month to get the gunzines all excited and convince the people out there that they absolutely have to have the new whatever? Jim |
November 1, 2013, 03:22 PM | #18 | |
Junior member
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,722
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|