The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Revolver Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old September 7, 2013, 11:33 PM   #1
CommissarHark
Member
 
Join Date: March 27, 2013
Posts: 15
.45 ACP v. 45 LC (DO NOT START A FIGHT)

I'm not here to spark a debate, I do not one a war in my thread. I cannot stress that point anymore. DO. NOT. START. A. FIGHT.

Moving on to my actual question. I own a Pietta reproduction 1858 Remington, a pair of them actually, one is pure blued steel the other has a lovely case hardened frame. I have converted the case hardened one with a .45 LC cylinder, and a loading channel. I want to convert the blued one as well. I purchased for it though, the .45 ACP cylinder, listening to everyone everywhere wax poetically about how it is the best handgun cartridge ever. However I was looking at my "Bible" (Lee Loaders Hand Book) and I realized that I am getting a lot less performance out of the .45 ACP, compared to my .45 LC loads, for almost 6000 psi more in pressure. Now 18000psi cannot be good for my gun, so I wonder what the point is in me having .45 ACP. I'd like real experiences with either, or both cartirdges, and any advice. I plan, currently, on returning the .45 ACP cylinder, counting the restocking fee, and purchased rounds as a loss, and purchasing a proper .45 LC cylinder to pair the guns. Any advice, or knowledge on the subject would be greatly appreciated, I only have until next Monday, 9/16/13 to make my decision before I'm over the limit for the return policy.
CommissarHark is offline  
Old September 8, 2013, 02:26 AM   #2
mmb713
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2011
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 421
The utility of the 45 Auto cylinder is that you can shoot less expensive 45 Auto through it. Whether one is better than the other is a moot point. At SAAMI specs with factory loads it's a pair of sixes. Where the 45 Colt starts to seriously outclass the 45 Auto is in the Ruger Blackhawk with handloads. I have a Blackhawk convertible and used the 45 Auto cylinder extensively, until I bought an auto pistol so chambered. Now it sees 45 Colt almost exclusively, I save my 45 Auto loads for my pistols. 45 Auto out of a revolver is a cool concept but it won't beat 45 Colt. I now prefer revolver cartridges for revolvers and auto pistol cartridges for auto pistols.
mmb713 is offline  
Old September 8, 2013, 02:49 PM   #3
rclark
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 12, 2009
Location: Butte, MT
Posts: 2,614
I also find myself shooting mostly .45 Colt in my convertibles. I reload. I can load a bit heavier bullets as needed/necessary where you can't with .45 ACP due to limited case volume. That said I do load 250g RNFP in my .45 ACP cases to shoot in my convertibles. If shooting in a revolver, you can use Auto Rim data for your .45 ACP cases. Gives you a bit more flexiblity in your loads.

All, said and done, I can think of only one good reason to use .45 ACP in a revolver and that is, you can shoot 'off the shelf' factory .45 ACP which is readily available. Otherwise .45 Colt is the way to go IMHO.
__________________
A clinger and deplorable, MAGA, and life NRA member. When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns. Single Action .45 Colt (Sometimes colloquially referred to by its alias as the .45 'Long' Colt or .45LC). Don't leave home without it. That said, the .44Spec is right up their too... but the .45 Colt is still the king.
rclark is offline  
Old September 8, 2013, 03:38 PM   #4
BigJimP
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 23, 2005
Posts: 13,195
If you reload ....it just depends on what you want to do / but I'd probably say go to the .45 Colt...../ and if you reload, its only marginally more expensive to reload.
BigJimP is offline  
Old September 8, 2013, 03:40 PM   #5
prm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 16, 2008
Posts: 102
I sent my 2nd Generation Colt SAA .45LC back to the Colt Custom Shop some years back and had it fitted with a .45 ACP cylinder. Best money I ever spent, it has more than paid for itself in ammo savings. I even think the accuracy may even be a little better with the .45 ACP. Although, that is hard to say as the gun is far more accurate than I am capable of shooting - LOL.
prm is offline  
Old September 8, 2013, 04:17 PM   #6
zxcvbob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2007
Location: S.E. Minnesota
Posts: 4,720
A friend has a Ruger .45 convertible, and had the .45 ACP cylinder it in when we were out shooting. I tried it, and .45 ACP out of a revolver is a sweet-shooting cartridge. If you handload, you can use heavy SWC bullets that wouldn't feed in a semiauto (look up .45 Autorim loads) And if you don't handload, you need the ACP cylinder because you can't always find .45 Colt ammo, and when you do it's really expensive.

I like my .45 Colt, but if all I had was .45 ACP I would be happy with that too. Don't worry about the higher pressure, with the smaller cartridge your gun doesn't care.
__________________
"Everything they do is so dramatic and flamboyant. It just makes me want to set myself on fire!" —Lucille Bluth
zxcvbob is offline  
Old September 8, 2013, 05:57 PM   #7
Slamfire
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2007
Posts: 5,261
I would believe that any blackpowder pistol is made from materials that are sufficient for blackpowder pressures. I really doubt the frame is alloy steel, or out of a quality alloy such as 4140. Those are just not needed for black powder, and even if they were used, you would have to show that the metal parts were heat treated as normalized 4140 is more than strong enough for blackpowder.

Yes, you have replaced the cylinder but the stresses in the frame are still carried by what should be fairly soft material.

If I wanted X velocity I would choose the cartridge that gave X velocity with the lowest pressures.

This is not a contest about which cartridge is better or more accurate, to me, it is an issue of reducing pressures.
__________________
If I'm not shooting, I'm reloading.
Slamfire is offline  
Old September 8, 2013, 06:38 PM   #8
9ballbilly
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 19, 2008
Location: northeast Florida
Posts: 610
I've owned both a Ruger Blackhawk .45colt and a 1911a1 .45acp. I've reloaded for both cartridges. I still have the Blackhawk. IMHO there is nothing wrong with the .45acp, I just found the .45colt more versatile. Keep in mind, this is just my opinion and your goals may be considerably different from mine.
9ballbilly is offline  
Old September 8, 2013, 07:33 PM   #9
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,433
The .45 ACP (Automatic Colt Pistol) cartridge was designed and intended to replicate the ballistic performance of a .45 Colt revolver in a smaller cartridge suitable for use in a semi-automatic pistol. Since the .45 Colt was originally a black powder cartridge, this was easy because smokeless powder is more efficient in terms of energy-to-volume.

You can easily load (or buy, although buying any ammo today is problematic) .45 ACP that's not loaded to the maximum, but even the maximum isn't going to hurt your pistol. According to SAAMI data straight from their web site, the average pressure for .45 Colt is 14,000 psi. The average for .45 ACP is 21,000 psi. Yes, that's a 50 percent increase, but it's also still a comparatively low pressure. For comparison, 9mm Parabellum runs in the range of 35,000 psi.

I have a .45 ACP conversion cylinder for an Italian SAA clone, and I have no worries about using it. Keep in mind that when the .45 Colt cartridge was developed (as a blackpowder cartridge, don't forget), the frames of the Colt 1873s were iron or mild steel, they weren't fully hardened the way even the Italian reproduction guns are today. You won't hurt your 1858 shooting .45 ACP through it.

For other points of comparison, .38 Special is (according to SAAMI) 17,000 psi, and .40 S&W is 35,000.

Last edited by Aguila Blanca; September 8, 2013 at 07:40 PM.
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old September 8, 2013, 07:42 PM   #10
m&p45acp10+1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 3, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 3,930
If one does not reload, and wants to do a lot of shooting. .45 ACP is going to cost way less than .45 Colt. When there is not a shortage going on then .45 Auto will be much easier to find, and is ususaly half the cost of .45 Colt off the shelf.

If one reloads then the .45 Colt can be loaded with heavier bullets, and has the case capacity for slower powders, giving more velocity. .45 ACP is cheaper, and easier to find. Many places finding .45 Colt brass is like getting a $50 scratch ticket winner.

Both ha ve thier pros, both have their cons. It comes down to one's personal preference.
__________________
No matter how many times you do it and nothing happens it only takes something going wrong one time to kill you.
m&p45acp10+1 is offline  
Old September 9, 2013, 04:55 PM   #11
XDforever
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 10, 2006
Location: North Texas
Posts: 171
I went to the local Mills Farm and Fleet earlier today and found multiple boxes of 45 ACP on the shelves. However, I was astonished to find probably 20 or so boxes of 45 long Colt also there. It has been a long time since I've seen that.

Alas, there was zero 9mm and 22lr in evidence.

Joe
XDforever is offline  
Old September 9, 2013, 05:30 PM   #12
CommissarHark
Member
 
Join Date: March 27, 2013
Posts: 15
I do reload

I actually do reloads which makes the .45 LC, from what I'm seeing here, make more sense. Now they say never use jacketed, and that seems to be all I can find in .45 ACP, any thoughts on that?

Also @SlamFire: The cylinder usually takes the brunt of the damage and it is made of 4140. The frame I do not know.
CommissarHark is offline  
Old September 9, 2013, 06:33 PM   #13
jtmckinney
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 2, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 490
I have a Ruger BH 45 convertible, love the gun and it's versitility. I have actually been shooting the 45ACP more in than the 45LC lately. One reason is I recently bought a High Point Carbine in 45 ACP (it may be a High Point but it is a fun gun). Hunting javelinas, jack rabbits and beer cans with both a few months ago was a blast.

I also reload. Neither has seen a factory cartridge since they were tested at the factory. I use Berry's 230 grain plated for practice and plinking and 230 grain Hornaday or Sierra hollow point for hunting. Current power charge is 8.3 grains 800X. This is actually pretty pleasant to shoot in the revolver. I have also shot 230 grain lead RN from a local supplier and they shot great in the revolver.

It is your choice if you return the cylinder or not but I am thinking it is some pretty good bang for your buck if you just bought the 45LC cylinder and kept the 45ACP cylinder.

Hope this helps.
James
__________________
“Government does few things well but it does them at great expense” Cal Thomas “When Government Can’t Be Trusted” 6/11/2013
When I am weaker than you, I ask you for freedom because that is according to your principles; When I am stronger than you, I take away your freedoms because that is according to my principles. Frank Herbert "Children of Dune"
jtmckinney is offline  
Old September 9, 2013, 06:34 PM   #14
Super Sneaky Steve
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 9, 2011
Posts: 1,245
.45 Colt wins!
Super Sneaky Steve is offline  
Old September 9, 2013, 08:12 PM   #15
newfrontier45
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 23, 2012
Posts: 921
I love the ACP in a single action but have reservations about using it in a converted percussion gun. These guns are not made of the same steels as their cartridge counterparts and I would be concerned about premature wear. Luckily, they are often found on sale at Cabela's for not much more than $200.
newfrontier45 is offline  
Old September 9, 2013, 09:34 PM   #16
tomrkba
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 29, 2011
Posts: 751
I use both and like both. They serve different purposes. I use 45 Colt for Cowboy Action Shooting through single actions. I use 45 ACP for defense and general use. It works. I'd love to get a Ruger Blackhawk with 45 ACP cylinder.
tomrkba is offline  
Old September 9, 2013, 09:42 PM   #17
Deaf Smith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 31, 2000
Location: Texican!
Posts: 4,453
Quote:
.45 ACP v. 45 LC (DO NOT START A FIGHT)
No fight needed.

The LC round is great by itself and needs no defenders.

The .45 ACP, in revolvers is ok, but unless it is a strong one you cannot load it to the potential of a .45 LC.

Now if it IS stronger, say a 625-1 S&W, you can use .45 Supers, and with a slight rebore you can use .45 Roland or .451 Detonics (Jimmy Clark of Clark's custom guns does such work on a good 625.)

Now once you use a revolver like a 625 then you an use .45 Autorim brass and load some ammo that easily equals .45 LC and LC +p. (Or just use .45 Supers!)

So, while I'd love a good DA S&W .45 LC, the .45 ACP version of the gun works good enough.



My 625-1 3 inch is at the top. With .45 Super 230 gr JHPs it chrono's out at 1000 fps from that 3 inch. I am sure I could get .45 Autorim brass to take a 250 SWC and hit the same 1000 fps.

Deaf
Attached Images
File Type: jpg T04.JPG (169.8 KB, 2786 views)
__________________
“To you who call yourselves ‘men of peace,’ I say, you are not safe without men of action by your side” Thucydides

Last edited by Deaf Smith; September 11, 2013 at 08:55 PM.
Deaf Smith is offline  
Old September 11, 2013, 12:35 PM   #18
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,675
Quote:
I actually do reloads which makes the .45 LC, from what I'm seeing here, make more sense. Now they say never use jacketed,...
WHO says never use jacketed?

Seriously, who is saying that? And about what?

The only time I ever heard any one say jacketed bullets shouldn't be used was in reference to muzzle loaders, for obvious reasons, or to those arms who's major components are made of iron or brass, and not steel.

Is it just some "expert" saying never use jacketed... or is it the maker of your gun? or the conversion unit? If it is a manufacturer, speaking about what they made, THEN pay attention. If its some web troll, just parroting something they heard once, that's a different matter.

you can use jacketed bullets in the .45 Colt. You can use jacketed bullets in guns designed (and stressed) for blackpowder loads. You just have to keep the pressures within the designed limits.

Now, if the maker of the gun says don't use jacketed bullets, then don't use jacketed bullets. They might say something like that, because with a reproduction black powder gun, the barrel steel might be "soft" compared to modern arms, and accelerated wear from jacketed bullets might result. I can see the sense in that, IF that is actually the case.

BUT, if not the case, there is no physical reason you cannot use jacketed bullets, providing the loads don't create higher pressures than lead bullet loads.

HOWEVER, when you are shooting at blackpowder pressure levels and velocities, there is no advantage to using jacketed bullets. They cost significantly more than lead bullets, and they do not work any better, until you get beyond the performance range black powder can give you.

And if you are going to be operating at velocities and pressures above blackpowder levels, hard cast lead bullets still provide excellent performance, particularly penetration. What they don't do is expand, and in .45 caliber expansion is a nice extra, not a required minimum for good performance.

Original performance figures for the .45 Colt were a 250gr bullet at 900-950fps. The .45 ACP is a 230gr bullet at 850fps+/-. (depending on barrel length and individual gun tolerances). This .45ACP performance was chosen to replicate the performance of the .45 Schoefield (aka .45 Govt, back in the day), which the Army considered the minimum necessary to reliably put down a horse (or a man). .45 Govt was the commonly issued ammo for Army revolvers, because it worked in both the S&Ws and the Colt SAA in Army use at the time.

Can't say I'm a big fan of converting black powder guns (replicas) into modern cartridge arms, but if that's your thing, enjoy. Just stay within the safe limits of the gun design AND the materials its made of.

Several have mentioned the joy they found, and the benefits of getting another cylinder and shooting .45 acp from their .45 colts. I went the other way. I had a .45 auto, and 30 years ago, got a .45 Colt convertible (ruger Blackhawk), with the intention of shooting my ACP ammo, and not having to hunt for the empties to reload. However, I made the "mistake" of shooting the gun with .45 Colt ammo first. I got hooked on the .45 Colt (and that Ruger!) In 30 years, I think I have put maybe 300 rnds of .45acp through that gun, but several thousand rounds of .45 Colt.

Here's something else to look at, what is the actual bore size of the gun(s) you are converting? Pre WWII, .45 Colt caliber guns generally had a .454" diameter bore. Post WWII guns in .45 Colt have generally adopted the .451/.452" inch diameter bore size of the .45acp.

Shooting lead bullets from either round generally handles variations in bore size acceptably well (for accuracy), as the relatively soft alloy upsets enough, or squeezes down enough for decent performance. Jacketed bullets, on the other hand, don't adapt so well, and could give poor accuracy in a slightly oversize (for the bullet used) barrel.

Original cap & ball guns, converted to firing cartridges generally kept their original bore sizes. This was not an issue back in those days, because the lead bullets used in the "new" cartridges would upset and fill the bore properly, anyway. Also the early cartridges all used the heel type bullets, with their full caliber size bearing surfaces.

This might be a reason for the maker to say not to use jacketed bullets, also. If the bore size is too large for standard jacketed bullet diameters, but lead will upset and fill the bore, that would be a good reason to only use lead bullets.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Old September 11, 2013, 01:29 PM   #19
newfrontier45
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 23, 2012
Posts: 921
Percussion guns are not made with the same steels and heat treatments as their factory cartridge counterpart. I wouldn't use jacketed bullets in any converted percussion gun.
newfrontier45 is offline  
Old September 11, 2013, 01:42 PM   #20
Lavan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 1999
Location: California
Posts: 2,714
I'm very very VERY happy with .45 ACP!



Lavan is offline  
Old September 11, 2013, 02:02 PM   #21
Magnum Wheel Man
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 26, 2006
Location: Southern Minnesota
Posts: 9,333
as the OP seems to understand, the longer case allows lower pressures, with matching velocities... I have a Blackhawk I converted to 45 Colt, & had a 45 ACP cylinder made for it, that shoots 45 Autorim & I find I can load them hotter than 45 ACP would be in a 1911, but if you are reloading, you might as well shoot 45 Colt... ( say's the guy with a custom autorim cylinder... sometimes variety is the spice of life )

butt... I'd never say that to my wife
__________________
In life you either make dust or eat dust...
Magnum Wheel Man is offline  
Old September 11, 2013, 04:51 PM   #22
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,433
Looking at the specs for commercial Ultramax "Cowboy" loads in .45 Colt, they offer a 250-grain bullet at 750 fps, and a 200-grain bullet at 765 fps. Respective muzzle energies are 290 ft-lbs and 300 ft-lbs. Winchester's Cowboy load is a 250-grain bullet at 750 fps, generating 312 ft-lbs of muzzle energy. (Don't ask me how two bullets of the same weight and traveling at the same velocity produce different muzzle energies. I'm just citing the specs I found on-line.)

Standard Winchester USA .45 Auto (ACP) is a 230-grain bullet at 835 fps, generating 356 ft-lbs of muzzle energy. Slightly hotter than the "Cowboy" loads, but not earth-shattering.

For comparison, Winchester's "regular" Super-X .45 Colt load is a 255-grain bullet running at 860 fps, generating 420 ft-lbs. And that's not a plus-P loading.

I don't think plain-vanilla, commercial .45 Auto is likely to do any harm to a modern SAA clone, or to a Pietta 1858 Remington clone. I own one of the latter, with a .45 Colt conversion cylinder from Kenny Howell. I didn't know anyone offered a .45 ACP conversion for the Remington clones (probably didn't back when I bought mine).

Last edited by Aguila Blanca; September 13, 2013 at 08:59 PM.
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old September 12, 2013, 11:15 PM   #23
Jim March
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 14, 1999
Location: Pittsburg, CA, USA
Posts: 7,417
OK. There's some peculiar stuff going on when you shoot a short autoloader cartridge from a long revolver cylinder.

FIRST, I don't think the 45ACP is a good idea in the converted front-stuffers...not unless I knew a lot more about the metallurgy being used in the 1858 clones by Pietta and Uberti. I would be curious enough to get a Rockwell test done on the frame as that would tell a lot.

Let me confine my comments to post-WW2 Colt SAAs, Ruger's New Vaquero, DA S&Ws and other guns known to be tough enough for full-power jacketed 45ACP.

The 45ACP has some interesting advantages over the old 45LC, to wit:

* For factory defensive loads, the 45ACP is still getting the very latest bullet tech from Federal, Winchester and others. Federal's devastating HST "police sales only" critter ships in 45ACP as does the barrier-penetration beast Hornady calls the "Critical Duty". There are others worth mentioning. These loads don't ship in 45LC.

* Reloading is faster and extraction is faster - DA or SA. On a DA you can use moons. On an SA you can thumb rounds into the loading gate out of 1911 mags or the like - not exactly "the cowboy way" but it works. And the tapered rounds extract faster and more reliably.

* Weirdest of all, the ACP gets a speed boost of sorts when traveling through the long smoothbore section of the cylinder that is "tight to the bullet". I don't know how much in a 45. I did some research on the 9mmPara (assuming a real 9mm-spec barrel as opposed to .357) and found that a 2" "snubbie" S&W was producing velocities on par with a 4" barrel Glock. That's impressive because a Glock has no barrel-to-cylinder-gap AND uses a nice poly-rifled hammer-forged barrel that tends to "spit fast". I would not have believed they were a wash but tests show otherwise. I believe this is due to the "tight smoothbore" going on for about 3/4" of travel, with zero (or close to it) gas losses via blowby. Now again, I don't know how much the boost is on a 45ACP in a full-sized gun, but I'd be willing to bet that a Ruger NewVaq in factory 45ACP with a 4.68" barrel is going to spit out rounds faster than a 5" 1911. Maybe a lot faster. Will it make up for the reduced case capacity vs. the 45LC? I doubt it, but...it's not impossible in similar weight loads. In the heavyweights suitable for four-leggers the 45LC will likely still pull ahead but...not for social use I don't think. Not given the slug development that's gone into 45ACP police use rounds...

It was this research that told me that I'd be happy converting Maurice the FrankenRuger NewVaq to a true 9mm complete with Douglass .355" barrel from a 357. True, power was going to drop but in terms of "social use" the per-round effectiveness could be bolstered by the police-grade 9mm+P/+P+ rounds that a former 357 can eat all day long and have been stacking up well against most .40S&W.
__________________
Jim March
Jim March is offline  
Old September 13, 2013, 09:06 PM   #24
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,433
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim March
* Reloading is faster and extraction is faster - DA or SA. On a DA you can use moons. On an SA you can thumb rounds into the loading gate out of 1911 mags or the like - not exactly "the cowboy way" but it works. And the tapered rounds extract faster and more reliably.
I wouldn't bet on that one. It's so little taper it almost doesn't count: .0028" for the body of the case.

http://www.saami.org/PubResources/CC...0Automatic.pdf

Yes, it's a taper, but so minor that you can't see it with the nekked eye. The 9mm Parabellum has a considerably more pronounced taper to it.
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old September 13, 2013, 09:40 PM   #25
Jim March
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 14, 1999
Location: Pittsburg, CA, USA
Posts: 7,417
Ah. Whoops. I thought the 45 taper would be more pronounced.

Still, when we're talking about cramming one cylinder into another, even miniscule tapers might help.

I know that 9mmPara shells auto-eject from Maurice much, MUCH harder than longer taperless 357Magnum shells. The difference shocked me, I had to add a hammer-mounted shell deflector immediately following my first shooting test in 9mm. 357s had been harmlessly bouncing off my goatee under gas-powered ejection straight back.

9mm standard pressure was thwacking my cheekbone.
__________________
Jim March
Jim March is offline  
Reply

Tags
.45acp , .45lc , 1858remington , cas , pietta

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07767 seconds with 11 queries