March 21, 2013, 09:51 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 13, 2013
Location: The East Coast
Posts: 477
|
Combat handgun vs...
I have read some descriptions of handguns and they are called "combat handguns". What exactly qualifies a gun as "combat ready" or not? Just curious. And what are some examples?
|
March 21, 2013, 09:57 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,214
|
I hate that term. To me it's an example of poetic license used by some to suggest a level of reliability/ruggedness inherent in a handgun that is not inherent in others. I don't go into "combat" with a handgun. I've seen examples of many so called "combat handguns" that have failed. In all honesty I find little difference in reliability between most current production handguns.
__________________
Know the status of your weapon Keep your muzzle oriented so that no one will be hurt if the firearm discharges Keep your finger off the trigger until you have an adequate sight picture Maintain situational awareness |
March 21, 2013, 10:05 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 1, 2012
Posts: 561
|
Combat handgun!!
Perhaps a combat handgun was meant to be a handgun that can be used under extreme conditions with a wide veriation of ammo and function reliably . Field stripped simply for cleaning with few issues in the design. What it has turned out to be tends to be something else completely different most times. For me a combat handgun would be a glock early 2nd or early 3rd gen . |
March 21, 2013, 10:15 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 15, 2013
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,416
|
A combat handgun is going to be the next media coined term for a handgun that has one or more of the following features:
1. Colored black, OD green, or desert tan 2. Has a detachable "magazine clip" 3. Has ammunition capacity of more than six rounds. |
March 21, 2013, 10:16 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 8, 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,820
|
One more thing, Combat Ready Hand Guns are usually considered larger caliber 9mm and up as well as medium to long barrel or full sized.
__________________
If you ever have to use a firearm, you don't get to pick the scenario! |
March 21, 2013, 10:50 AM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
Quote:
Comparable euphemisms for compact, subcompact, and micro-compact are "concealable", "backup" or "pocket", and "mouse" respectively.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak |
|
March 21, 2013, 11:36 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: March 6, 2013
Location: INDEPENDENCE, MO
Posts: 62
|
In my opinion a Combat Handgun is what ever you have at the time it is needed. I don't see the point of CC with one Handgun and Training with another handgun.
However, I'll agree with the association with "combat" guns being full sized. |
March 21, 2013, 11:44 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 8,518
|
I've read a pretty convincing argument for a S&W J-frame snubby, dropped in a pocket, as combat handgun of choice.
I agree that the term usually applies to a "full sized service pistol", but when you think about how much room such a gun, and a couple of reloads, takes up on the belt, and how that space, and weight, would be better used for two or four more reloads for the primary weapon, tucking a snubby away might make more sense than a 15-round M9 and 30 more rounds of 9mm. |
March 21, 2013, 11:56 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 3, 2011
Posts: 1,368
|
A combat handgun is more tactical than other handguns.
|
March 21, 2013, 12:05 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 18, 2011
Location: The Woods
Posts: 1,197
|
It seems that they generally have more features designed to make them easier/faster to use under duress, and fewer features designed to make them concealable. Also, generally their generally more geared towards reliability than aesthetics.
"Combat" upgrades - to me anyway - might be matte finish, beveled mag wells, trimmed mag release, night sights, and more aggressive stippling/checkering. But, I don't think there's a standard definition.
__________________
si vis pacem para bellum |
March 21, 2013, 12:32 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,214
|
Quote:
__________________
Know the status of your weapon Keep your muzzle oriented so that no one will be hurt if the firearm discharges Keep your finger off the trigger until you have an adequate sight picture Maintain situational awareness |
|
March 21, 2013, 12:53 PM | #12 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 1, 2010
Posts: 5,797
|
Harris Publication?....
I guess you never picked up a Combat Handguns magazine?
The gun of choice? As some left wing/anti 2A media wags call it. A "combat" or "fighting" handgun is a revolver or pistol meant to used for defense or as a sidearm. The term is not as popular as the 1970s/1980s. Harris Publications has a few great firearms/gun press magazines. They do tend to reprint the same topics & run gun articles with completely different firearms(a Glock 21 .45acp with color pics of 2 uniformed cops holding HK P2000 pistols, ). CF Last edited by Spats McGee; March 21, 2013 at 02:42 PM. Reason: Removing asterisks |
March 21, 2013, 01:02 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2008
Posts: 10,442
|
Here's an easy way to tell what all those confusing gun terms mean:
Assault rifle - one being used to assault you. Defensive rifle or handgun - one you use to defend against the above. Combat handgun - one used by either the attacker or defender, once the trouble starts. Or It ain't what's in their hand, it's what's in their heart.
__________________
Walt Kelly, alias Pogo, sez: “Don't take life so serious, son, it ain't nohow permanent.” |
March 21, 2013, 01:02 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 23, 2005
Posts: 13,195
|
It's a "marketing term" ..../ I wouldn't get too hung up on what it is or isn't...
Buy what you want, what you can afford - shoot what you want ...in whatever caliber and size you want....( you can make an argument that a Single Action revoler could be a "combat handgun" ...and while I like them a lot / my reloads speeds on them kind of suck.../ but it could still be a great combat handgun..... |
March 21, 2013, 01:45 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 15, 2013
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,416
|
Once the term becomes common usage, the anti-2A folks will be saying they're weapons of war and don't belong in our hands, just like they're doing with AR-type rifles.
|
March 21, 2013, 03:29 PM | #16 | |
Junior member
Join Date: March 14, 2013
Posts: 51
|
Quote:
Suitably lethal caliber (NOT 25 ACP)? Not a single action revolver, cap and ball . . . ??? Be skeptical and cynical about marketing hype. If you're not in the armed forces, "combat ready" is not something you need to worry about personally. |
|
March 21, 2013, 03:49 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 15, 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,566
|
It is a marketing term, dems would call it an assault handgun. For some reason no one is willing to call them defensive guns which is what they really are.
|
March 21, 2013, 04:36 PM | #18 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
Quote:
Quote:
Chicks dig elite operators. <snicker>
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak |
||
March 21, 2013, 04:59 PM | #19 |
Staff
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,821
|
I think the term elite operator has been upgraded to operational athlete.
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some. |
March 21, 2013, 05:14 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 10, 2012
Posts: 1,059
|
When I think of a 'combat handgun', I think:
- service caliber - track record of reliability - duty/service/"full size" frame "combat" is generally associated with LE or service work, but this isn't always the case. One of my coworkers is a civilian, who has never been in law enforcement or military service. He has been in combat, while working in maritime security. More than a few of my customers have been in shoot-to-live scenarios, which many of us would call 'combat'. As a civilian who carries for the purpose of defending my loved ones and myself, I have a healthy interest in making sure that my carry weapon is 'combat ready'. I also have a healthy interest in making sure that every choice that I make in life keeps my loved ones and myself away from situations in which I am forced to enter combat.
__________________
Currently Own: Beretta PX4 9mm, Glock 23 (Gen 4), Glock 19 (Gen 4) x2 |
March 21, 2013, 05:24 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 22, 2009
Location: S.E.PA.
Posts: 920
|
I specificly bought my Colt ''Combat'' Elite cause it said, ''combat'' on the slide. It must be a combat gun, right?
__________________
NRA member, DCF&S member, PAFOA member, USPSA member, NSCA member R.I.P.____Murphy |
March 21, 2013, 05:27 PM | #22 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: May 6, 2012
Location: Southeast Texas
Posts: 1,670
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
March 21, 2013, 05:33 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2005
Location: E Tennessee
Posts: 828
|
I think of it as "combat" as opposed to "target".
A target gun might have a super light trigger pull, weaker recoil springs for lighter loads, very tight tolerances for maximum accuracy (but with potentially less reliability in less than optimum conditions). |
March 21, 2013, 06:13 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 23, 2013
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 720
|
What Xero said...
|
March 21, 2013, 08:28 PM | #25 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 1, 2010
Posts: 5,797
|
Man caused disaster?...
Is that like man caused disaster? Or rendered harmless?
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|