The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: General Handgun Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 23, 2020, 01:57 AM   #26
Rangerrich99
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 20, 2014
Location: Kinda near Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,155
Either a S&W M&P9 or .40 2.0, $399, according to GunBroker.
Rangerrich99 is offline  
Old March 23, 2020, 08:11 AM   #27
jetinteriorguy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 28, 2013
Posts: 1,259
I bought my FEG Hipower clone for $225.00 and so far FN parts have all fit. Plus this leaves me $200.00 for mags and ammo. All steel, shoots great and actually quite easy to carry. Otherwise in a new modern gun it would have to be a Ruger. But if I could find a S&W model 67 for this price I’d snatch it in a moment and be perfectly satisfied.
jetinteriorguy is offline  
Old March 23, 2020, 09:14 AM   #28
jr24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 29, 2011
Posts: 767
Reality? Wilson EDC X9. Once I got mine the rest of my pistols all were demoted to "on the chopping block" potentially.

For this thought experiment?

Beretta APX would do it. Modular so I can have some flexibility, reliable, accurate, good trigger, under $400.

It'd need new sights and I'd have to adapt to the megafat slide for carry, but I'd find a way.
jr24 is offline  
Old March 23, 2020, 11:12 AM   #29
stinkeypete
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 22, 2010
Location: Madison, Wisconsin
Posts: 418
I can’t bear this thread for several reasons:
1. I would be miserable without a .22 target pistol
2. A fella needs a hunting handgun
3. We need one more. For some it’s to carry, for some it’s for sport.
4. A well built handgun can last three generations, maybe more. I don’t mind paying a bit more for quality tools that will last.

The obvious answer is Ruger, because they are the Toyota of the gun world in America.
1. Ruger Mark IV for a target pistol, put an Ultradot on it. Target, plinking, small game
2. Ruger Blackhawk 5.5” in .44 or .45. Deer through Dinosaurs.

For .22 and single action, Ruger has pistols I do actually want to own.

For anything else... not so much. I could live with their other offerings.

But what if I say something like Norinco? I am keeping my Olympia clone forever and I hear their 1911 clone has an excellent frame for custom work.. I’m sure they have something interesting I would want if we could buy them.

Baikal? If you can get the huge Baikal .22 target pistol, buy it. It’s as good as a Hamerli. I bet the Russians make a nice makarov, too.

These are other “cheap but good” options.

In the end, I’m gonna add the Bersa Thunder .380 as a fun centerfire pistol at any price.
stinkeypete is offline  
Old March 23, 2020, 11:54 AM   #30
HistoryJunky
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 7, 2010
Location: Freeport, IL
Posts: 742
Probably one of the CZ clones like the Tanfoglio Witness.

I have seen them as cheap as 250 and they take CZ-75 magazines.

I am most familiar with CZ-75 style DA/SA type operation of firearms.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
HistoryJunky is offline  
Old March 23, 2020, 03:24 PM   #31
bspillman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 28, 2011
Posts: 546
I’d go M&p
bspillman is offline  
Old March 23, 2020, 03:28 PM   #32
Mainah
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 9, 2007
Posts: 907
Quote:
Used S&W Model 10 .38 special....4 inch barrel.
Me too.
Mainah is offline  
Old March 23, 2020, 07:53 PM   #33
Onward Allusion
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 2009
Location: Back in a Non-Free State
Posts: 2,850
$400, eh? S&W SD9, an extra mag, & a couple of boxes of ammo.
__________________
Just keep this in mind the next time humanity fails you - "designed by clowns, who in turn are supervised by monkeys."
Onward Allusion is offline  
Old March 23, 2020, 07:56 PM   #34
TBM900
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 2, 2015
Posts: 568
The answer is easy as pie.... a Makarov

There isn't a more reliable, rugged, simpler, accurate, easy to shoot, easy to maintain and service pistol.
That is inexpensive to own, inexpensive to practice, inexpensive to maintain.
100+ years from now they will still be in use somewhere.
The proverbial "AK47" of the pistol world.



__________________
Queen of England
Retired Colonial Marine
14th Earl to walk on the moon

Last edited by TBM900; March 23, 2020 at 08:06 PM.
TBM900 is offline  
Old March 23, 2020, 08:54 PM   #35
tlm225
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 21, 2004
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 881
My handgun priority is self defense and the gun has to be able to be concealed and carried under virtually any circumstances. Assuming a new purchase:

For me a S&W shield.
__________________
All that is neccessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.
Edmund Burke
tlm225 is offline  
Old March 23, 2020, 10:03 PM   #36
triplebike
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 24, 2010
Location: Eastern, Pa
Posts: 269
Quote:
Originally Posted by TBM900 View Post
The answer is easy as pie.... a Makarov

There isn't a more reliable, rugged, simpler, accurate, easy to shoot, easy to maintain and service pistol.
That is inexpensive to own, inexpensive to practice, inexpensive to maintain.
100+ years from now they will still be in use somewhere.
The proverbial "AK47" of the pistol world.



DING, DING, DING! We have the winner! Never entered my mind but you are so right. Great post!
triplebike is offline  
Old March 24, 2020, 12:48 PM   #37
Targa
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 20, 2014
Posts: 2,010
M&P9c
Targa is offline  
Old March 25, 2020, 12:03 PM   #38
CajunBass
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 6, 2005
Location: North Chesterfield, Virginia
Posts: 4,571
Smith and Wesson SD9VE.



I think I paid $250-275 (used) not too long ago. It would do anything I wanted a handgun for.

I'd really prefer a revolver, but that $400 limit keeps it down to something like this. Maybe an old Taurus 66 if I could find one.
__________________
For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
John 3:16 (NKJV)
CajunBass is offline  
Old March 25, 2020, 05:10 PM   #39
rep1954
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 5, 2009
Location: Mid Western Michigan
Posts: 1,157
I would look around for a used S&W model 64 and if I got exhausted doing that then I would get a model 10 either one with a 4” barrel.
__________________
When I ask my wife where she wants to go for dinner she just tells me where she doesn’t want to go.
rep1954 is offline  
Old March 26, 2020, 07:17 AM   #40
GarandTd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 15, 2016
Location: Western PA rainforests
Posts: 1,325
M&P9c for an auto

Taurus 66 for a wheel gun

SAR K2P 9mm for what I already own that fits the criteria

EDIT: I'd be pretty peeved to have to give up my MkIII 22-45/w red dot
__________________
22lr, 20 gauge, 8mm Mauser, 35 Remington, 30-06, 5.56x45/223, 9mm, 380acp
GarandTd is offline  
Old Yesterday, 05:49 AM   #41
Hal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 9, 1998
Location: Ohio USA
Posts: 8,334
new and under $400?

Man - I don't know - - maybe a dozen Hi Points?

Opps - I forgot - only 1.... .

I'm with a lot of the others. That $400 is killing me.
I just bought a S&W M69 snub (.44 magnum) - that could easily replace every gun I have for every purpose - - But - with tax and holster & a box of JHP's it set me back $1000.
Hal is offline  
Old Yesterday, 08:54 AM   #42
chaim
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 11, 2001
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,027
You can see answers all over the place here. I guess some people are VERY optimistically estimating how low they may be able to find gun prices, others may be basing it off prices from years ago, while some areas may have VERY low gun prices. Based upon local and recent prices (within the past year, not the past few weeks with panic buying), I don't think I could buy 1/2 of what people have put on this list with an under $400 limit. Though, at least 1/2 do seem to be realistic choices (and many are very good choices).

Strictly keeping by the set limits, I'd be looking at:
  • Bersa Thunder .380. The size and caliber aren't ideal, but they work. They are a little big for a small .380 carry gun, but it works (and can work well) in all except the most discrete carry situations, but is big enough to run a couple boxes of ammo through it at the range without too much discomfort. The caliber isn't ideal for defense, but is workable, it is a little expensive for a lot of range practice, but isn't too bad.
  • The new Taurus 856 Defender. J-frame sized, 3" barrel, 6 round .38spl. Get it in steel and not aluminum and it would be OK at the range (especially with a full grip), though their website lists it up to 35oz (no way it is that heavy) it would also work CCW. The cheapest runs at a $425MSRP, and the most expensive at $477 (all with night sights), so they'd likely all run at or under $400 at the store (maybe the most expensive would be out of the price range).
  • S&W M&P40c. Around here you should be able to get a 1st gen for under the $400 limit, good luck finding a M2 anywhere near that. My 1st gen M$P40c is comfortable at the range, and when in a carry state, I can conceal it well and it is comfortable to carry.
  • S&W SD40VE. Inexpensive, proven, reliable, reasonably accurate, a good intermediate size for both CCW and the range.
  • USED Taurus 65 or 66 (preference to the 7-shot 66 over the 6-shot 66). There is no way anyone is getting either for under $400 around here new, but used that may be possible (though one is more likely to find the 6-shot 65 at that price). Medium frame, 4" revolver, would be possible to CCW, though not ideal. It would be a great HD and range gun.
  • Used RIA 1911. It might be possible to get for under $400 in decent shape in most areas of the U.S. An Officer sized or Commander sized gun would carry well, even if all steel, and a Commander sized lightweight aluminum gun (likely not to be found under $400 though) would still be comfortable at the range.

I think my first choice on the above list is the M&P40c, but all would be strong contenders.

Now, a more realistic scenario, and less arbitrary, should the current situation lead to enough of a personal economic/financial catastrophe that I need to sell everything off, but want to keep one, which would I go with. It likely wouldn't be a gun that sold for less than $400, though I wouldn't keep one of my more expensive guns since they'd bring me more money (that I'd probably desperately need at that point). The S&W M&P is still high on that list, but so is my Officer sized RIA 1911, my CZ 75B Compact, my .40S&W SIG P229 (bought used and only in fair condition cosmetically for $499), my S&W 65LS (though it is worth enough that in such dire financial straits it may have to go), and my CZ PCR. There is a slim chance that I'd go with my Taurus 85CH, not ideal at the range (but doable since it is all steel), I'd hate to only have 5 rounds, but it isn't worth much (so I wouldn't get much for selling it) and it is 100% reliable. If I had to choose right now and not spend time thinking about it, it may be the 65LS only because it will be the hardest to replace later (appreciation and increasing scarcity). If I had to grab one that would most likely come with me if I had to leave my home right now (and thus abandon and not sell my other guns), that would be my CZ PCR, P01 or 75B Compact. Due to lower cost ammo (an important criteria if I was in such bad financial shape), one of the 9mms may win out from that angle as well (thus if I kept my M&P40c, I may try to trade it on a 9mm version).
chaim is offline  
Old Yesterday, 08:59 AM   #43
pete2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 15, 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,144
A used S&W .357 or 38.
pete2 is offline  
Old Yesterday, 01:15 PM   #44
Forte S+W
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 12, 2019
Posts: 253
By the way, I have to ask, the $400 limit is BEFORE TAX, right?

Because that makes a big difference.
__________________
I know that Balistics Gel is merely a tissue simulent, but until the day comes in which convicted registered sex offenders are put to good use as a testing medium for ballistics, it's the best we've got. Besides, Ballistics Gel is probably the closest thing to the sort of human sludge that typically requires the use of a firearm in self-defense.
Forte S+W is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2018 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.07453 seconds with 9 queries