|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 2, 2017, 02:51 PM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 30, 2009
Location: Boncarbo,Colorado
Posts: 651
|
just saying, you saw what the kit looked like before you bought it.
__________________
https://buckskinsbp.blogspot.com/ |
August 9, 2017, 08:03 PM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
|
Finally dialed in.
What a pain. After chasing my own tail for a while, because it didn't dawn on me over the past couple weeks to shoot a separate target for each sequential load from a clean bore, I eventually figured this thing out. Based on the current zero: Clean, greased bore goes way low and way, way right. (~14" low and ~36" right @ 100 yd) Second and third rounds stack up nicely, right at the POA. Fourth round goes 5-7" high and 12-18" left. There's a lot of machining chatter on the land at 9 o'clock (3 o'clock, looking from at muzzle). And there's a nick in the crown at about 2:15-2:30 (10:30-10:45 looking at muzzle). But, neither of those should be causing a variable divergence issue that is also influenced by fouling -- especially when considering gyroscopic precession and point of impact. ...The stupid thing just doesn't like to be clean. (Or very dirty.)
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. Last edited by FrankenMauser; August 9, 2017 at 10:17 PM. Reason: Left out some words that made me look dumberer. |
|
|