|
October 9, 2018, 07:45 PM
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: October 8, 2005
Location: palm beach county, fl
Posts: 257
|
Win Ranger 127+P+
Been out of the performance ammo loop for a few years. Just wondering if Win Ranger 127+P+ is still a top performance ammo in 9mm. Bought a CZ evo carbine from a friend in need a few months ago and looking for a defensive ammo to feed it.
Thanks |
|
|
October 10, 2018, 02:51 PM
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: September 2, 2001
Location: Out West in Rim Country
Posts: 1,091
|
In looking at the Lucky gunner tests, the 127 +P at ~1200 FPS looks pretty inconsistent. Might be just the thing in a carbine at higher velocity though. I used to buy, use and carry the 127 +P , but never did any gel testing with it. I'd have to go through old chronograph notes, but probably chronographed it in a carbine somewhere along the way. I don't recall seeing any gel testing with the 127+P in a carbine, but such tests might be out there somewhere.
__________________
COTEP 640, NRA Life |
|
|
|
October 10, 2018, 02:56 PM
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: December 21, 2001
Location: Boston, People's Republic of MA
Posts: 1,616
|
Still a good round by all accounts, but it's a bit hard on some guns. HSTs in any variant other than the Micro are probably just as good without the extra pressure.
__________________
Proud to have served. |
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
