|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 29, 2017, 07:57 PM | #26 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
I have spent time as a LEO, and long-time firearms enthusiast and shooter. I have never fired a shot in anger, but have received LEO training. But I have studied some situations in which a gun was used in self defense, so perhaps I am as well qualified as some folks to comment on the issue.
The "2 and 1" and similar comments are, in almost all situations, simple fantasy. In a tight situation, with a handgun, few shooters (no matter what they claim on sites like this) would be able to even hit the bad guy, let alone place shots precisely. The idea that you (or I) would stand calmly, with bullets incoming, and place shots in a precise area with a tight group is dreaming. I have witnessed trained police officers, on a calm range, under ideal conditions, miss a man-size silhouette target at 50 feet. Armed with a handgun and Under stress, with bullets flying, I doubt they (or I) could have taken careful aim and fired a head shot. Of course, there are some shooters who could do so as far as mechanical ability goes. But they are people who often do almost nothing but practice shooting, competition or "trick" shooters who have no other job and no other duties. But they also are almost never found engaged in combat; they are the exhibition shooters we all envy, not the police or armed citizens who may actually be out on the street when the need arises. Should everyone who carries a handgun be able to fire one-inch groups at 50 yards? Of course, in some other world. In this one, everyone, whether police officer, jury member, or simply commenter, needs to recognize that the real world is seldom ideal and that most shooters will, at best, be able to defend themselves and their loved ones effectively, not ideally in some fantasy land of tight groups and between-the-eyes shots. Jim |
December 29, 2017, 08:32 PM | #27 | |
Junior member
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,722
|
Quote:
..... And I do get SO tired of the term, "trained Police Officer" in reference to firearms proficiency..... I have talked with LEOs, both gun enthusiasts and not.....shot with them......... cops that are not enthusiasts don't shoot any more than necessary, by and large...... And those that do not shoot, do not drill, whether they are cop, butcher,baker or candlestick maker ....... Stink at shooting. Of course, compared to John Q. Public, they have infinitely more experience with guns, because even if John has a gun, he probably hasn't moved the socks off it since he bought it and put it in the sock drawer....... |
|
December 29, 2017, 09:23 PM | #28 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2005
Location: Where the deer and the antelope roam.
Posts: 3,082
|
Quote:
__________________
Retired Law Enforcement U. S. Army Veteran Armorer My rifle and pistol are tools, I am the weapon. |
|
December 29, 2017, 09:29 PM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2005
Location: Where the deer and the antelope roam.
Posts: 3,082
|
Headshot? Depends on the circumstances. Today, could be a bomb, plate carrier, etc.
__________________
Retired Law Enforcement U. S. Army Veteran Armorer My rifle and pistol are tools, I am the weapon. |
December 30, 2017, 01:08 AM | #30 |
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
Having watched at least one rabbit do what seemed like an eight-foot back flip after being shot through the eye, I’d caution against assuming that even a well-delivered head shot will prevent a spasm or other dying reaction of the nervous system.
|
December 30, 2017, 04:46 AM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 13, 2006
Location: western north carolina
Posts: 1,641
|
A head shot you will need a lawyer because you will end up in court, at least civil court!
__________________
Every day Congress is in session we lose a little bit more of our Liberty. |
December 30, 2017, 07:11 AM | #32 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2005
Location: Swamp dweller
Posts: 6,187
|
Quote:
__________________
NRA Life Member, NRA Chief Range Safety Officer, NRA Certified Pistol Instructor,, USPSA & Steel Challange NROI Range Officer, ICORE Range Officer, ,MAG 40 Graduate As you are, I once was, As I am, You will be. |
|
December 30, 2017, 08:24 AM | #33 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2005
Location: Where the deer and the antelope roam.
Posts: 3,082
|
Quote:
__________________
Retired Law Enforcement U. S. Army Veteran Armorer My rifle and pistol are tools, I am the weapon. |
|
December 30, 2017, 08:25 AM | #34 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2005
Location: Where the deer and the antelope roam.
Posts: 3,082
|
Quote:
__________________
Retired Law Enforcement U. S. Army Veteran Armorer My rifle and pistol are tools, I am the weapon. |
|
December 30, 2017, 09:11 AM | #35 | ||
Staff
Join Date: June 8, 2008
Posts: 4,022
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
December 30, 2017, 12:01 PM | #36 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
Quote:
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
|
December 30, 2017, 01:42 PM | #37 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 4, 2010
Posts: 5,468
|
Hi, at no point did anyone say anything about body armor. It said right inside the first brief, unambiguous post "in the belly" not "bounced off of his armor." Two hits in the belly or chest is going to be very damaging, and two hits in the belly or chest do not automatically call for a more difficult follow up shot to the head to put an end to aggression, not at all. That shot will either be at a moving target the size of a swollen soft ball, or at a stationary target that's just laying there immobile.
We keep coming back to the absolute foolishness of taking head shots when unnecessary. Turning away from something that works and risking a weak attempt at a final, finishing move to end all possible aggression. Unless the terminator is still coming and uninjured after taking the two initial hits, why would it be desirable, especially if the probability is that probably only one percent of americans could actually make a brain pan follow up shot during a genuine, actual gunfight? Call it editorializing if you want, I really don't care, everything that is said in the aftermath of that shooting will be skewed. shooting a guy three times with a kill shot finishing him off if going to be the most controversial and polarizing shooting possible. Everybody is going to find something to say about it, and not a lot of it will be unbiased. If someone does this very thing, there is one absolute certainty. There will be screaming, loud, endless screaming about what happened. Even if your own family and friends, and maybe even everyone in the whole county is clapping their hands, there will be plenty of others who will be calling the professional rabble rousers like the aclu, or god forbid, paid protestors. You will have hostile lawyers who have an absolute obligation to rip your reputation apart and do everything possible to make you hurt, even put you in prison for life if possible. Quote:
No matter how you think it should be or want it to be, you have an entire world of people out there who are just looking for an excuse to vent their hate. Lynch mobs don't bother with ropes now, they just set buildings on fire.
__________________
None. |
|
December 30, 2017, 01:59 PM | #38 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: May 4, 2010
Posts: 5,468
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
None. |
||
December 30, 2017, 03:32 PM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Location: McMurdo Sound Texas
Posts: 4,322
|
That wouldn’t happen today in Austin. The DA and former police chief decided *EVERY* defensive shooter is arrested and goes to the grand jury.
__________________
Cave illos in guns et backhoes |
December 30, 2017, 03:32 PM | #40 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 22, 2017
Posts: 1,011
|
Quote:
AS the the moral and ethical aspect, your question. as presented, seems premised on the idea that if you intentionally shoot for the head as opposed for shooting at the "center of mass", you are more intent on achieving a deadly outcome. Is this the way you intended for it to be taken? A civilian self-defense shooting is intended to neutralize an immediate threat to your life or the life of another that is in immediate peril. If the idea is to neutralize the aggressor with the minimum damage to that agressor and the maximum potential to save the aggressor's life and allow him/her to return to a normal life, then the fact the vital organs make up a smaller portion of the assailant's body make up a smaller portion of the body than the brain does of the assailant's head, In that respect, you would shoot for the center-of-mass and thus - hopefully - realized the lower legality likely with shots into this area. If, however, the objective to take the assailant "out of the fight" for as long as the fight lasts so a to allow you to save innocent by-standers, the fact a head wound is more likely to divert the assailant's attention would argue for a head shot every time. |
|
December 30, 2017, 04:11 PM | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 4, 2010
Posts: 5,468
|
TXAZ, iirc, martinez deputized a bystander. People popped up out of nowhere and went all alamo on the tower. Even without police presence, whitman would have eventually been taken down by civilians alone. IIRC, when the first armed cop arrived at the scene there were civilians at the tower itself, one civilian actually went onto the deck. Then he bungled it with an accidental discharge.
Everyone who reads that story will get something different out of it. Some people are going to see snuffy smith and the shootin' iron, others will see a bunch of camo wearing rednecks, only a few people are going to see a courageous group of citizens who stood in the path of sniper fire and tried to save lives.
__________________
None. |
December 30, 2017, 04:11 PM | #42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 13, 2010
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 2,016
|
How threads like this make it beyond one page is astonishing.
__________________
NRA Life Member USN Retired |
December 30, 2017, 04:25 PM | #43 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Location: McMurdo Sound Texas
Posts: 4,322
|
I don’t doubt it for then Brian, but that wouldn’t happen there today.
__________________
Cave illos in guns et backhoes |
December 30, 2017, 05:37 PM | #44 | |
Staff
Join Date: June 8, 2008
Posts: 4,022
|
Quote:
So, a defender may be acquitted, or perhaps not be charged, in the criminal justice system, and still end up fighting it out and possibly losing in the civil courts. That's a fundamental principle of tort law. I can think of no reason why the location of a wound would, by itself, enter into the question. |
|
December 30, 2017, 06:07 PM | #45 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Location: McMurdo Sound Texas
Posts: 4,322
|
Because it’s a holiday and too cold to go out in -16, so we’re all waiting for the next interesting opportunity to offer our expert opinions on gun related discussions.
In April or May, you’re probably right.
__________________
Cave illos in guns et backhoes |
December 30, 2017, 06:18 PM | #46 | |
Junior member
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,722
|
Quote:
In my profession, I deal with practical applications of physics, chemistry and material properties and environmental conditions .... Lawyers deal with selected case law, a couple of colleges and 12 people that had squat better to do .... I think they are overpaid, and overused. |
|
December 30, 2017, 06:31 PM | #47 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2005
Location: Where the deer and the antelope roam.
Posts: 3,082
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Retired Law Enforcement U. S. Army Veteran Armorer My rifle and pistol are tools, I am the weapon. |
||
December 30, 2017, 06:32 PM | #48 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2005
Location: Where the deer and the antelope roam.
Posts: 3,082
|
Quote:
__________________
Retired Law Enforcement U. S. Army Veteran Armorer My rifle and pistol are tools, I am the weapon. |
|
December 30, 2017, 06:34 PM | #49 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2005
Location: Where the deer and the antelope roam.
Posts: 3,082
|
Quote:
__________________
Retired Law Enforcement U. S. Army Veteran Armorer My rifle and pistol are tools, I am the weapon. |
|
December 30, 2017, 06:49 PM | #50 |
Member
Join Date: December 25, 2017
Posts: 39
|
In a justified self defense situation you shoot until the threat is eliminated. So if you fire 5 rounds and 1 hits and the assailant in down crying and his weapon is a safe distance away "threat gone", job well done and if you fire 5 shots and they all hit including a headshot and the assailant is clearly dead "threat gone" job well done again. Basically if you are ever in a situation that justifies "deadly use of force" you continue to defend yourself until the threat is gone whether they are injured or dead I guess is up to shot placement and the good man upstairs. Lord forgive me for saying that a dead criminal is a good criminal but I guess if an assailant survives maybe just maybe there's a chance they can turn their lives around which I doubt but we're not here to judge. Stay safe and shoot often!
Godspeed |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|