|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 18, 2018, 04:06 PM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 1, 2010
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 4,556
|
POI will most always change with the addition of any muzzle device.
Ideally, the change in harmonics is consistent- and therefore known and not an issue as it is anticipated and compensated for. Anyone with a suppressed rifle knows the POI shift and simply dials the difference depending on whether the device is on, or off, the rifle. "Accuracy" should remain the same. Barrel contact that's inconsistent, such as lying it over sticks, or barrel-mounted bipods (cringe-worthy) will not produce consistent changes to harmonics and will cause not only a POI shift- but often a degradation in accuracy as well.
__________________
Remington 700/Savage Rebarreling /Action Blueprinting 07 FFL /Mosin-Nagant Custom Shop/Bent Bolts Genuine Cerakote Applicator www.biggorillagunworks.com |
April 19, 2018, 08:36 AM | #27 |
Junior member
Join Date: July 26, 2001
Location: midwest
Posts: 2,374
|
The simplest way for M1 Garand owners to test the 'harmonic' effect of attaching a bayonet - and thus accuracy and group dispersion on POI - is to shoot one 8-rd clip without the bayo attached, and then a second 8-rd clip with it mounted.
At, say, 100-yds, even with a tight bayo-on-barrel lock-up, you'll see a different POI and some amount of dispersion. Now the real question is: how much does this change matter? Holding tight MOA groups on paper targets at 600-yds is one thing. Inside 200-yd, in combat conditions, firing on enemy soldiers charging you (think: Chosin Reservoir), the effect of the bayo on "combat accuracy" is probably meaningless, ... and yet a mounted bayo gave the soldier an immediate secondary weapon to stay in the fight, once that en bloc clip went PING! Last edited by agtman; April 19, 2018 at 04:20 PM. |
April 19, 2018, 09:38 AM | #28 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 23, 2015
Location: MinneSNOWta
Posts: 454
|
I agree with several others, the bayonet, if contacting the barrel, is affecting the harmonics of the barrel. This is the same reason "free floating" a barrel is the fastest way to accurize (debatable) your AR-15.
Quote:
|
|
April 19, 2018, 10:33 AM | #29 | |||
Junior member
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,722
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
April 19, 2018, 04:18 PM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 1, 2010
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 4,556
|
We're off-topic here, but suppressors are commonly used on more current SWS's and will likely be expanded to be standard kit for many more.
Disadvantages; frequent disassembly/cleaning, length added to the weapon making handling more difficult, and added weight. The advantages of sound suppression, flash suppression (perhaps even more important than sound) and enhanced communication between the sniper and his spotter make having it available, a no-brainer. The Operator will determine whether or not it would be advantageous to deploy depending on the nature of the engagement-but saying a suppressed SWS is a "close range weapon system" seems to be devoid of any factual basis. Recent article on use of suppressors on the battlefield from the Military Times: https://www.militarytimes.com/news/y...field-tactics/
__________________
Remington 700/Savage Rebarreling /Action Blueprinting 07 FFL /Mosin-Nagant Custom Shop/Bent Bolts Genuine Cerakote Applicator www.biggorillagunworks.com |
April 22, 2018, 09:48 AM | #31 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 13, 2018
Posts: 1,326
|
Quote:
Huh, you should write the SOTIC committee and let them know! Do not confuse employment with capability. Audie Murphy discovered that 60 mm mortar rounds had the capability to be used as makeshift hand grenades. That has nothing to do with how the US Army employed 60 mm Mortar ammunition. 1. A suppressor is not a functioning suppressor without subsonic ammunition. Little physics: Lower velocity = lower energy = shorter range.. Does anything else need to be said or do we understand the physics and why your suppressed sniper rifle is a close range weapon with a suppressor as compared to its engagement distances unsuppressed? 2. Shooting a suppressor with supersonic ammunition turns it into nothing more than a very expensive flash hider. A nice flash hider but it is not a suppressor anymore. I agree the sonic crack can actually help in concealment but that is NOT how suppressors are employed in the US Army at the time I was trained and USED them. 3. Once more suppressors are pretty restricted in their life limits and a round count was required. As suppressor technology advances I agree that it would not be a bad thing and is becoming more practical to use. |
|
April 22, 2018, 09:59 AM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 13, 2018
Posts: 1,326
|
Once more, in terms of practical sniper field craft, a suppressor does little to reduce the number one thing that gets you busted in your shooting position. It is not the muzzle flash that gives you away. It is the dirt and leaves that gets kicked up by pressure wave of the round exiting the barrel.
|
April 22, 2018, 10:46 AM | #33 |
Staff in Memoriam
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
|
I can hardly wait for the command, "Fix suppressors!"
|
|
|