|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 12, 2017, 01:24 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: November 26, 2017
Posts: 18
|
+p or P+P in a colt Mk4 mod 70?
I wanted to ask if anyone knows if the colt bbl is safe with the P loadings.
|
December 12, 2017, 02:43 AM | #2 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: August 19, 2004
Posts: 7,133
|
It's not the barrel you need to worry about, as such. You won't blow one, if that's your concern.
Denis |
December 12, 2017, 07:22 AM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 27, 2007
Posts: 5,261
|
Quote:
Basically, what to you think you are going to get with +P or +P+ ammunition? Do you feel safer because you think the extra oomph is going to give you better lethality?, does more always mean more?
__________________
If I'm not shooting, I'm reloading. |
|
December 12, 2017, 08:22 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 4, 2001
Posts: 7,478
|
The standard 16 pound recoil spring is good for standard load 230 grain ammo at 800 feet per second.
Going to a 17 to 18 pound spring "may" improve operation and lessen battering, but it's hard to argue with John Browning and Colt who designed the gun to use a 16 pound spring. If you use hotter ammo you need to up the strength of the recoil spring. For hotter ammo over 800 fps you may need a spring of 20 to 22 pounds. Remember, the stronger springs also cause the slide to slam shut harder, and that too causes battering of parts. The law of diminishing returns holds here, and while you can use +P ammo with a stronger spring, using +P+ ammo is rarely justified and definitely will cause the gun to wear much faster. If you're facing a human, +P+ isn't really going to make a real difference, but will wear out your pistol. If you intend to face a grizzle or polar bear, then you'd be better with a more powerful type of gun, possibly a 10mm. |
December 12, 2017, 10:07 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 7, 2006
Posts: 10,981
|
+P+ kills them deader!
|
December 12, 2017, 10:10 PM | #6 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,460
|
Quote:
|
|
December 12, 2017, 11:30 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: November 26, 2017
Posts: 18
|
I just wanted the information, not trying to kick over the beehive.
I have a buffer installed and the poly washer under the recoil spring for the slide to bash instead of the frame. I can't remember if I went up on the spring tension back then. I would never argue with Mr. Browning about gun design. I assume that my old bowling pin loads exceeded any +P currently made. I did what I could to mitigate any extra wear and tear. |
December 12, 2017, 11:52 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 23, 2005
Location: US
Posts: 3,652
|
The occasional range session with +p is fine Imo. Keep a 16lb recoil spring, ditch the shock buffer, and get a square base firing pin stop. Going up in mainspring weight will help a lot... At the expense of trigger pull weight. Which is why I quickly discarded the idea of hotrodding 45 in a 1911.
|
December 13, 2017, 07:31 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2005
Location: Swamp dweller
Posts: 6,187
|
+P+P+P will be just fine Have to love the gimmick of +P having people jump all over it. It will kill them even deader than regular ammo plus your follow up shots will be nowhere to be found
__________________
NRA Life Member, NRA Chief Range Safety Officer, NRA Certified Pistol Instructor,, USPSA & Steel Challange NROI Range Officer, ICORE Range Officer, ,MAG 40 Graduate As you are, I once was, As I am, You will be. |
December 18, 2017, 05:14 PM | #10 |
Moderator in Memoriam
Join Date: August 28, 1999
Location: North Texas
Posts: 4,123
|
+p or no +p
I messed around with all sorts of .45 ACP loads for decades. After spending a lot of time and money with various bullet shapes and weights, both factory and handloads, I finally decided to become realistic.
Standard stuff is usually best---certainly simpler. I measure factory ammo against 230 gr. hardball at standard velocities. Unless doing the most precise possible methods, it is difficult to tell which target was shot with Federal,R-P,or Winchester ammo. Many years ago, I adjusted my practice handloads, 230 RN cast, 230 RN plated, and 230 RN jacketed, so that they all hit pretty much the same point of impact as the factory ammo. Happily, I found that Speer Gold Dot 230 HP standard velocity impacted right in there with that same ammo. I sometimes have to look for the GDHP which is NOT the Plus-P load. No problem. I'm retired and kind of enjoy shopping at ammo suppliers. The GDHP (and factory FMJ) standard velocity loads are adequately powerful without the max velocity "advantage." They are easier to shoot well and don't batter my pistols as much. A five-inch Government Model or even a 4.25-inch barrel Lightweight Commander are sufficient with standard velocity ammo. Yeah, when I pack a snubby .38 Spl or a compact 9mm, the +p ammo is something of a comfort, but I don't feel the need with a .45 ACP. For whatever its worth, my handloads are for practice or hunting. I carry factory ammo when I go out in public. Best regards JPG |
December 18, 2017, 05:49 PM | #11 |
Junior member
Join Date: October 20, 2012
Posts: 5,854
|
Should be safe for reasonable P+P loads, provided you install a stiffer spring. Should be fine with P+ stock.
|
December 19, 2017, 05:25 PM | #12 |
Junior member
Join Date: April 17, 2005
Location: Hartford, Vermont
Posts: 519
|
My CCW load in my Glock17 is the Corbon 9mm 115gr JHP +p load. I have read that the G17 can handle +p and +p+ loads, but I don't shoot this stuff very often at all. I can highly recommend the Corbon load. I chronographed it at 1400 FPS.
|
December 30, 2017, 03:49 PM | #13 |
Junior member
Join Date: April 17, 2005
Location: Hartford, Vermont
Posts: 519
|
It's +p and +p+. I shoot them without problems in my Glock 17.
|
|
|