The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 6, 2018, 03:18 AM   #1
Dead-Nuts-Zero
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 26, 2004
Posts: 579
Berrys Vs Rainier 9mm 124 gr FP plated Questions

Have loaded only Rainier plated for years but have about 2K Berrys I have hoarded for a decade or more. Got them out & I find the Berrys were slightly above the .355 that was consistent with Rainier.
Some Berrys were .356 & a few at .3565 but seemed to average .3555.

Currently shooting Raniers with 4 gr. Win 231 & very happy with results with well over 10K loaded & fired in my CZ-75b. Not sure I want to mess with the Berrys but I'm almost out of Rainiers & want to use them up.

Are simple changes in setup needed or are they about the same? If I recall correctly the bullet OAL is the same but the tapper is slightly different.

Anyone familiar with both bullets and what is your preference?
__________________
.
.
BANG------------ >>> !
Dead-Nuts-Zero is offline  
Old June 6, 2018, 10:22 AM   #2
pete2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 15, 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,566
I've loaded Berrys, Ranier, Everglades, bulletworks.com, RMR, I can't tell one from the other when shooting. I don't load max loads with plated bullets, your mileage may vary.
pete2 is offline  
Old June 6, 2018, 10:48 AM   #3
tranders
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 5, 2001
Location: Indiana
Posts: 233
I have loaded Berry's and Everglades plated 124 grain RN and can't tell a difference in how they shoot. I just like Pete2 ,never load plated projectiles at max velocities.
tranders is offline  
Old June 6, 2018, 12:30 PM   #4
kmw1954
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 11, 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,524
D-N-Z. that 4.0gr of Win231 is exactly what I shoot the Berry's at. I'm shooting those from 2 different guns too. I too doubt the difference will be noticeable.
kmw1954 is offline  
Old June 6, 2018, 03:38 PM   #5
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,063
DNZ,

A long as they aren't actually smaller in diameter than the groove diameter of your barrel, the throat will swage them down to size. Usually, up to about 0.002" oversize, there are no issues. I've seen some complaints about 0.003" oversize being accompanied by accuracy reduction, but other situations in which it was no problem, like in bullets sized to fit a .454" revolver chamber throat on a gun with a 0.451" barrel groove diameter.

If you are able to sort them by size, do so with some of them so you can see if your gun prefers one size over another with that same load. If so, segregate out all the bullets that turn out to be your gun's favorite size and save them for matches or to impress your friends, as you prefer.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is offline  
Old June 7, 2018, 10:47 AM   #6
m&p45acp10+1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 3, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 3,930
I would use them. I by mistake loaded 250 of the 125 grain fp. For my 9mm. The problem is those bullets were .38 cal. I tried tbe plunk test with 20 and they worked. I shot all 250 out of 5 different guns. All fed just fine. Accuracy was just fine as well.
__________________
No matter how many times you do it and nothing happens it only takes something going wrong one time to kill you.
m&p45acp10+1 is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.04267 seconds with 8 queries