August 11, 2018, 07:34 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 31, 2013
Location: East Texas
Posts: 1,705
|
6.5 bullet performance
I was out hunting the other night for hogs, and ran into a sow that would easily tip the scales at 250 lbs.. I got her broadside through the front shoulder and when working on the carcass found a lump on the off side. The bullet had lodged just under the skin after penetrating through both shoulders...which dropped her on the spot. I recovered the bullet, which was a 123 Hornady SST, fired out of a 6.5 Grendel. I have been pretty impressed with that bullet and have used it for hogs and deer out of a 6.5 Creedmore as well. I weighed the bullet to compare to new weight and it came out as 95.8 grains.
|
August 11, 2018, 07:12 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,246
|
Very nice performance! I do prefer an exit, but it’s obviously unnecessary if it’s DRT.
Distance to pig? |
August 11, 2018, 09:25 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
|
6.5 grendel with SSTs is my new favorite for deer. I actually used the grendel to put down a domesticated form of bacon, although that one was probably closer to 150 than 250. got a complete through and through from the top of the skull down through the base of the neck... granted it's point blank, but it did the job quite well.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar. I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin |
August 11, 2018, 09:30 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 14, 2013
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 2,685
|
I put a 140 grain sst into a 180 pound whitetail at 40 yards and it just short of turned inside out. Only 80 grains was recovered and the deer traveled 13 long jumps without a drop a blood and fell dead. This was out of a 6.5 Arisaka. When we butchered the deer the projectile was also found on the other side of the body just under the hide.
__________________
NRA Lifetime Member |
August 12, 2018, 01:21 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 31, 2013
Location: East Texas
Posts: 1,705
|
It was shot at about 140 yds., and she dropped on the spot. I've shot a bunch of them with this caliber and bullet, but never recovered a bullet before. I don't open them up though and only take the hind legs and backstraps, so the buzzards and coyotes have to deal with the bullets in them I guess.
|
August 12, 2018, 06:40 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 22, 2015
Location: new england
Posts: 1,159
|
Good post, thank you. I have some 140 SST loaded in the 6.5x55. Not yet hunted them. And long term, want to add a Grindel rifle to the mix. I was thinking the 123 might be too light in the sweed. I think I will get a box of the 123, just to play around.
|
August 12, 2018, 08:49 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 8,221
|
I'm pretty sure the 123 grain SST was designed for the Grendel. I really like the way the SST bullets shoot, but I hate their performance on game if driven too hard. I think if you keep the MV around 2800 FPS with the SST they work fine, if you get over 3000 FPS and the bullets just don't hold up well. I guess I should try them in something other than the .243 Win and .270 Win.
__________________
NRA Life Member Last edited by taylorce1; August 13, 2018 at 02:34 PM. |
August 12, 2018, 10:36 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 31, 2013
Location: East Texas
Posts: 1,705
|
I shoot the 6.5 Creedmore, as well as the Grendel, and the 123 SST does very well in that too. In fact I started into the 6.5's with the Creedmore using the 123 SST's, and was so impressed that I started experimenting with the Grendel as well. I'm very happy with their accuracy and performance in both calibers.
|
August 13, 2018, 09:21 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 23, 2016
Location: West of the Atlantic
Posts: 418
|
Quote:
__________________
Matthew "All men are ignorant. The topics of our ignorance may vary, but the nature of the world is that no man may know everything." ~ R Jordan |
August 13, 2018, 09:43 AM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,715
|
Quote:
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011 My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange |
|
August 13, 2018, 08:40 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 14, 2013
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 2,685
|
Quote:
__________________
NRA Lifetime Member |
|
August 14, 2018, 12:42 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
|
the difference between 28 inch barrels and 20 inch is quite a bit. 2200-2300 is what I get out of my arisaka carbine, but the load data for Hornady suggested I should be getting 2600-2700. hornady uses the long barrel.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar. I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin |
August 14, 2018, 05:35 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 14, 2013
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 2,685
|
You know I never even though about checking the total gun reference. Hornady #3 and #10 both say Arisaka with 32 inch barrel. Mine are both carbine length. One sporterized one original.
__________________
NRA Lifetime Member |
August 14, 2018, 07:35 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 23, 2016
Location: West of the Atlantic
Posts: 418
|
All things considered though, that's enough to answer my question. I have a friend who loves the SST, but he will switch ammo and zero to shoot if he's hunting at closer ranges. He has had similar performance issues when taking game a point blank ranges. So I was wondering if high velocity could be an issue is your case. Clearly I'm not used to Arisakas. 2300-2600 fps is a perfectly reasonable range of velocity for modern bullets to hold together better than that.
__________________
Matthew "All men are ignorant. The topics of our ignorance may vary, but the nature of the world is that no man may know everything." ~ R Jordan |
August 14, 2018, 01:11 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
|
you would think so, but I've had Nosler Accubonds break in half at 100 yards with the Arisaka carbine(muzzle velocity below 2200). and the accubond is supposed to have a minimum velocity of 1800 to even open.
depending where you hit, bad stuff can happen. back to the grendel with 123gr SSTs, 95 to 100 grains is pretty standard retention for me, and expecting more than 80% weight retention for any small caliber, non-bonded hunting round is kindof unrealistic.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar. I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin |
August 14, 2018, 01:52 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 31, 2013
Location: East Texas
Posts: 1,705
|
I shot this guy early this morning with the 6.5 Grendel 123 SST again. Placement makes a lot of difference with these bullets, but I am very fond of their results. I had to take a quick offhand shot at about 40 yds., with nothing to rest the rifle on and no sling. As a result I hit him a few inches further back than I like to do and ended up putting the bullet through both lungs. Hogs can soak up a lot of punishment, and he went about 25 yds before he gave it up. When I get them through the front shoulder, they normally go right down. He was a pretty fat guy at least 200 lbs.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|