|
|
|||||||
| Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 13, 2023, 08:59 PM
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: June 17, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,778
|
Shipping cast bullets (just the cast projectile) to Canada
Looking a Canadian regs it appears straightforward.
Looking at the tangle of US ITAR, CCL and EAR99 classification write-ups, however, makes my head hurt. Anyone actually done it cleanly, and/or have a good citation wherein plain English it used? |
|
|
September 14, 2023, 06:07 PM
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: March 21, 2012
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 3,851
|
I think you mean lead weights?
__________________
I don't believe in "range fodder" that is why I reload. |
|
|
|
September 14, 2023, 06:18 PM
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: June 17, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,778
|
< smirk
 >It's just in my job... I gotta be on the side of the angels if/- when someone opens/X-rays the relatively small package. I dare not try to invoke the Brandon defense. 
|
|
|
|
September 14, 2023, 07:49 PM
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: March 21, 2012
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 3,851
|
The only issue i can see is hazmat due to the lead Itself. My understanding was itar generally related to technologies, cast lead is well past advanced technologies. But im no expert.
__________________
I don't believe in "range fodder" that is why I reload. |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
