![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,347
|
Don’t forget the 1861 Navy with the “creeping” rammer of the 1860 Army.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#27 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,218
|
Quote:
I believe what he's saying is that you should get a '58 or a '60 if what you want is a .44 caliber firearm, because that's what those were originally made in. The '51 Navy was originally a .36 caliber firearm. For whatever reason, the Italian clone makers offer versions of a gun styled like the '51 Navy but chambered in .44 caliber -- essentially, nice "copies" of a firearm that never existed. If what you want is a .36 caliber, the '51 is the right choice for you, and it's historically correct.
__________________
NRA Life Member / Certified Instructor NRA Chief RSO / CMP RSO 1911 Certified Armorer Jeepaholic |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|