![]() |
|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 13, 2009
Location: northern CA
Posts: 721
|
It’s funny you bring this up. I agree with folks above depends on glass quality. I have a good 1-6x scope on my deer rifle, my friend has a 5-20.5x. He would make me glass deer to determine if they were legal to harvest or not. He’s 10 years younger than me so I thought he had bad vision but I finally looked through his scope and that thing is trash.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 31, 2017
Location: Va., Ct., Mo..
Posts: 945
|
when no matter what you do, and no matter how tight a weld you have, or how controlled your breath is, the hairs bounce around worse than iron sites...................
__________________
Retired Military Aviation Former Member Navy Shooting Team Distinguished Pistol Shot,NRA Shotgun/Pistol Instructor NSSA All American, Skeet/Trap Range Owner |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 15, 2006
Posts: 411
|
It depends on how and where you hunt. If you are on stand, watching a field, etc. then a big scope is pretty handy, but I would still want to be able to crank it down to 3 or 4 power on the low end. A scope that can give you a few more minutes of daylight to see and shoot is nice.
If I am walking a fair ways, especially woodlands, then I want a light fast handling rifle with a low powered varible like a 2 x 7 power, kept on 2 for a fast shot. If you need to crank up to higher powers then you probably have time, but you don't have time to crank it down on a quick fleeting opportunity. |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2010
Posts: 302
|
Quote:
Just Enough - is optimal for hunting. Lower power optics increase field of view, and bring the kinematics of aiming closer to the Natural 1:1 ratio, so there is less crosshair "dance." Running game is also easier. One does not need to see the precision, just to be able to aim accurately and hit with precision. 1x/100 yards works fine in the field, and you will shoot better and quicker. So, 2.5x is a good field magnification out to 250 yards. Red |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 4,986
|
To be fair, it depends on the size of the target I try to hit. For me it is 1moa minimum, ideally 4.
Say a soda can at 300yd is about 1moa. 4x brings it to 4moa. Mighty good enough for target identification and sight placement. I don't need to read the brand to hit it. -TL Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|