The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Tactics and Training

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old December 6, 2015, 12:41 PM   #1
Overkill777
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 4, 2015
Posts: 267
Tactic in a Mass Shooting Situation

With the recent attacks in the news like the one in Paris and the one in California I have seen a lot of discussion on which weapon/caliber/ammunition to use to defeat these attackers. I have seen comments like have a bigger gun in the car, or use a weapon that penetrates body armor, etc.

It makes me wonder because it seems like a lot of these people are talking like if they are in the vicinity of a mass shooting they will go towards threat to try to stop it. This is troubling to me. When people say things like they are going to go to their car and get their rifle or get their magnum revolver to make a 100 yard shot on the perpetrator, it makes me think they are just talking fantasy and probably have not really thought this through.

Me, personally, if I'm near a mass shooting and I make it to my car, I'm getting in and driving away. My purpose for carrying is to protect the lives of myself and my family. Going towards the threat is not my job, and counter to the reason why I carry. I am not trained or qualified to fight determined attackers, my goal is to evacuate myself and my family safely.

In this type of situation if the threat is in my immediate vicinity (or a family members) and I'm cornered, that is probably the only time I would use my weapon. Otherwise I'm going to evacuate. Is that an appropriate or inappropriate mindset?

It's easy to talk about what you would do in a situation like this but there are so many unknowns and it's much different when fight or flight kicks in. I think its important to try to have a realistic mindset though.
Overkill777 is offline  
Old December 6, 2015, 01:13 PM   #2
pax
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2000
Location: In a state of flux
Posts: 7,520
Quote:
In this type of situation if the threat is in my immediate vicinity (or a family members) and I'm cornered, that is probably the only time I would use my weapon. Otherwise I'm going to evacuate. Is that an appropriate or inappropriate mindset?
First: I like the way you think.

Second: asking whether it's an appropriate or inappropriate mindset is probably the wrong question. Not because the question itself is bad, but because it's a question that only you can answer, for yourself alone. We are talking about some deeply personal subjects that affect whether you live or die, after all. Nobody else can tell you what's appropriate or inappropriate by your own moral code. We can only discuss what's practically possible, what's legally defensible, and what's tactically sound.

We've done a lot of thinking, exploring, and role play on these subjects. Lots of conversations with the family, lots of analysis of different mass shooting events (including the ones that didn't work out well for the attacker as well as those that did).

After an event, there's always a lot of coulda-woulda-shoulda from both people who were there and from people who were not. It's very easy to get caught up in the idea that we know what would have happened if this or if that. But we really don't. Hindsight is every bit as limited as foresight. It only does (and only can!) tell us what actually happened, not what would have happened if things had been different.

But even with that, we can figure out some very broad principles based on what has happened at multiple events. For example, we know that most of the time, the attacker will quit (often killing themselves) at the first sign of effective resistance. We also know that this is not always true -- and that when it is untrue, it can result in the death of the would-be hero who has rushed in to save the day.

We know that hesitation kills or sometimes cripples the would be good guy. (Google "Dan McKown" for one example.)

We know that most survivors of any mass event are the ones who simply left at the first sign of trouble. They didn't wait around to indulge their curiosity, they didn't wait to meet up with friends or family, they may have grabbed others on their way to safety but they didn't stay to argue if others wouldn't come. They simply left.

We know that many survivors hide from trouble and don't get found. We know that some "play dead" so the attacker will shoot other, living people and leave them alone.

We know that would-be survivors who are hiding and are found are often sitting ducks for the attacker. We also know that sometimes, attackers repeatedly shoot the fallen bodies of their victims, to make sure they are really dead.

We know that most experts recommend: Run. Hide. Fight. -- in that order. There's a reason for that. There's also a reason why I suggest setting up a tactical ambush if you must hide and if you can reasonably do so, so that you are prepared to fight from your hiding place.

We also know that in open areas such as shopping malls and large stores, the victims may be able to see the killer actively murdering people from a LONG way away.

For me, I'll take the "run, hide, fight" thing. But I'll also carry a weapon that I KNOW I can use effectively at up to 100 yards, to hit a man-sized target at that distance. And yes, I'm talking about my everyday carry gun, my little Glock 26.

It's not about the guns we carry. It's about the skills we have to use those guns.

I'd hate to be in a place where I could see murders happening at a distance, but couldn't trust myself and my equipment to take that shot if necessary.

I'm not going to run to the sound of the guns; I'm going to leave. But if I'm there, if I can't leave, and if I can see what's happening well enough to gamble everything I own and everything I am on getting it right -- I will do whatever it takes to stop that threat before it gets close enough to kill me and the people I love.

pax
__________________
Kathy Jackson
My personal website: Cornered Cat
pax is offline  
Old December 6, 2015, 01:25 PM   #3
pax
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2000
Location: In a state of flux
Posts: 7,520
One more thing. Here's a video of a disturbance at a mall in Tacoma a couple of years ago. It's not a shooting, just a very angry man throwing things around.

Notice the very different reactions from people in the crowd. There were people who left the area immediately. And there were also people who really, really wanted to know what was going on.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMA4zYs83Lo

Curiosity kills.

pax
__________________
Kathy Jackson
My personal website: Cornered Cat
pax is offline  
Old December 6, 2015, 02:22 PM   #4
1-DAB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 5, 2010
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 474
couldn't say it any better.

the Israelis learned over time how to deal with repeated attacks. they learned that they couldn't put an absolute stop to them, but they could make the attacks far less 'profitable/deadly' for the attacker. they report stray boxes and bags. they liberally allow concealed carry of firearms. so the attackers can't depend on their bomb just sitting there to go off when they decide. they can't depend on being the only one with a gun. yeah, they still kill innocent people. but the odds have greatly been evened.

any of this sound familiar? we are having the same type of debate now. the current administration seems to be favoring more 'intelligence' and 'surveillance' and depending on the police to prevent these attacks from happening, and less to allowing law abiding people to lawfully carry concealed firearms to both protect themselves and to serve as a deterrent to attackers.
1-DAB is offline  
Old December 6, 2015, 04:48 PM   #5
Frank Ettin
Staff
 
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1-DAB
...the Israelis ... liberally allow concealed carry of firearms......
I have to digress slightly to correct a common misconception. It's important that we always preserve our absolute credibility. But the Israelis do not liberally permit the concealed carry of firearms.

A lot of people in Israel are legally carrying a gun in public, but they are not "just plain folks" like the gun owners in the United States. If you are legally carrying a gun in public in Israel you are (1) active duty military; or (2) a police officer; or (3) one of the select few licensed to carry a firearm.

Israel has very restrictive firearms laws.

Some new rules make only the few, minor changes noted the article in this article:
Quote:
...Issuing permits will be done responsibly and with scrutiny and discretion, and in keeping with the approved criteria.”

As opposed to the United States where gun ownership is a right, in Israel it is a privilege given to people who meet certain requirements.

The licenses have only been issued to those who work in security or law enforcement, or who live in settlements or other places where the state has an interest in them being armed.

As of earlier this week, criteria included that the applicant be over 21, an Israeli resident for more than three years, have passed a mental and physical health exam, background checks by the Public Security Ministry and shooting exams and courses at a licensed gun range. If given a permit, the holder is allowed to order a single firearm with a one-time supply of 50 bullets from a licensed dealer. He is required to retake the licensing exam and undergo testing at a gun range every three years. He also has to prove he has a safe at home to store the gun.
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper
Frank Ettin is offline  
Old December 6, 2015, 05:07 PM   #6
FireForged
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 4, 1999
Location: Rebel South USA
Posts: 2,074
I know how to fight and I train to protect myself.. If I cannot escape then I am going to fight. A bad guy is a badguy is a badguy, I have no intention to change my current personal self defense strategies due to some recent evils in the world.
__________________
Life is a web woven by necessity and chance...
FireForged is offline  
Old December 6, 2015, 05:51 PM   #7
1-DAB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 5, 2010
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 474
thank you, i stand corrected.
1-DAB is offline  
Old December 6, 2015, 06:16 PM   #8
Overkill777
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 4, 2015
Posts: 267
Thank you pax. Very well said. You eloquently described what I was trying to get at without getting too hypothetical.

I need to reflect on your point about being able to actively engage targets at a distance with your everyday carry pistol. I think it's time to broaden my handgun training.
Overkill777 is offline  
Old December 6, 2015, 06:21 PM   #9
1-DAB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 5, 2010
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 474
overkill - ever shot an IDPA match? great good fun, it will challenge your skills, you might even learn new ones.
1-DAB is offline  
Old December 6, 2015, 06:37 PM   #10
pax
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2000
Location: In a state of flux
Posts: 7,520
Overkill -- I agree with 1-DAB about an IDPA match being great fun and a good way to stretch your shooting skills. Among other things (and not the least important of these), shooting any type of competition forces you to shoot to solve problems other people have set up. It gets you out of the habit of just shooting the things you're already good at and already enjoy, and drives you to practice skills you're not already good at. That's good stuff.

But don't look to IDPA to help with distance shooting. The rules prohibit anything past 25 yards (and most clubs avoid even that distance).

pax
__________________
Kathy Jackson
My personal website: Cornered Cat
pax is offline  
Old December 6, 2015, 06:52 PM   #11
1-DAB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 5, 2010
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 474
25 yard max for scenario stages, 35 yard max for standards stages.
1-DAB is offline  
Old December 6, 2015, 07:02 PM   #12
pax
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2000
Location: In a state of flux
Posts: 7,520
Thanks, yes.

pax
__________________
Kathy Jackson
My personal website: Cornered Cat
pax is offline  
Old December 6, 2015, 09:57 PM   #13
Big Shrek
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 6, 2009
Location: NorthWest Florida
Posts: 1,358
If I'm trapped in a building and my pistol is in the car,
will use anything and everything at hand to get out,
including fire extinguishers, alarms, phone/computer cords,
plan the use of each and every doorway/window between me and OUT,
use cover & concealment as best as one can & haul butt to safety.

Once pistol is retrieved, will probably go back and try to get more folks out.
Was a firefighter for too long, hard to leave folks to burn, as they say...

At the worst, will set up in the parking lot to prevent BG's from leaving.
When the Blue Lights appear, let them handle it and stay out of the way.


Most folks plan out how to leave due to fire, few think about tactical retreat
from terrorists of workplace violence...but in this day & time,
one had better start planning how to get out of ANY place they enter,
and a plan for defense...
not surprisingly, many folks are disobeying their company rules on firearms now...
everyone I know with a CCW is now carrying at work, using deep concealment,
even though the company forbids firearms on property...
they're rather survive to be fired, than filled full of lead.
__________________
Marlin Specialist
Calico Specialist
A gun should be a tool in the hands of a deadly weapon, not a deadly weapon in the hands of a tool.
Big Shrek is offline  
Old December 6, 2015, 10:29 PM   #14
Onward Allusion
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 2009
Location: Back in a Non-Free State
Posts: 3,133
I'm not very articulate...

- run
- hide
- fight

In that order, gun or no gun - outside my home in an active shooter situation.
__________________
Simple as ABC . . . Always Be Carrying
Onward Allusion is offline  
Old December 6, 2015, 11:10 PM   #15
raimius
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 27, 2008
Posts: 2,199
Run. Hide. Fight. is a sensible order for these situations.

Those going "hunting" for bad guys are usually the LEOs or those who don't seriously contemplate the issues they would face (those who don't understand the complexity/danger of one-man CQB).

My personal theories tend to focus on evacuating people from the area. Active shooters are MUCH less effective with no people around to kill! Engagement would likely only occur if the event started in the same area that I was in, or if I found myself in an advantageous position to initiate an attack on the criminal. I have a personal beef with active shooters (a friend was murdered by one), so I would hope I could use past training/experience to win if I saw an opportunity to stop them.
raimius is offline  
Old December 7, 2015, 12:06 AM   #16
Hiker 1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 596
Are you willing to risk your life to protect people you may or may not know in a situation you didn't expect and in less than ideal circumstances?

A lot of good people have decided to do just that. What happens next is what happens next.
Hiker 1 is offline  
Old December 7, 2015, 01:01 AM   #17
ms6852
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 3, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,394
Overkill, in my opinion,your thinking is very intelligent. Just because we have a license to carry does not obligate us to perform as law keepers.

I believe that the best way we can help the police in such scenarios is to run and escape from the area along by helping anyone else needing assistance so that there is no confusion for the police.

If I ran towards the gunfire just because I have my ccw with me, and see you with a gun in hand, with all the chaos going how am I able to establish who is the good guy and the bad guy. Remember you only have seconds to react and I end up shooting you. Situations are not always clear.

Run , hide, and fight is a great strategy.
__________________
ONLY TWO DEFINING FORCES HAVE GIVEN UP THEIR LIVES FOR YOU. ONE IS JESUS CHRIST FOR YOUR SOUL AND THE OTHER IS THE AMERICAN SOLDIER FOR YOUR FREEDOM.
ms6852 is offline  
Old December 7, 2015, 05:39 AM   #18
GLS_1956
Member
 
Join Date: March 19, 2011
Posts: 22
When I got my carry permit, in Oklahoma, I was told my permit did not give me authority to intervene in any crime, except defending myself, my close family, friends and coworkers from potentially deadly attack. Nothing was said about stopping a terrorist attack or mass shooting. So the run, hide and seek cover response is the correct, legal act.

Having said that, I don't think I could face my maker having turned my back on evil.
GLS_1956 is offline  
Old December 7, 2015, 08:41 AM   #19
BlueTrain
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 26, 2005
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 6,141
I often make cynical remarks here (because I'm a cynic) but I don't mean to offend anyone. After the theater shooting, I suggested people need to hit a target in the dark, shooting uphill (having dropped the requirement that the target was on horseback). The new requirement is to be able to hit a coworker at the office party if the event anyone leaves the room.

The worst thing that ever happened at an office party where I work is a young woman showing off her tattoo is a place that usually isn't displayed. But maybe that was the best thing that ever happened.

Probably the worst thing that happened was an employee breaking their leg while walking across the lobby. Perhaps we would be better off preparing for other emergencies besides shootings, unless there are guns around.
__________________
Shoot low, sheriff. They're riding Shetlands!
Underneath the starry flag, civilize 'em with a Krag,
and return us to our own beloved homes!
Buy War Bonds.
BlueTrain is offline  
Old December 7, 2015, 09:25 AM   #20
kraigwy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
Bob Pincus' (I believe a member of TFL) Personal Defense Network, put out an excellent DVD on civilian reactions to Active Shootings.

Well work getting a copy and viewing it every now and then.

Great work on Flee, Hide, or Fight.
__________________
Kraig Stuart
CPT USAR Ret
USAMU Sniper School
Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071
kraigwy is offline  
Old December 7, 2015, 10:10 AM   #21
TimSr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2013
Location: Rittman, Ohio
Posts: 2,074
I think it is human nature to look over any such situation and consider what might possibly have been done differently that may have changed the outcome or saved a life. Maybe it is "fantasy", but I would hope that anyone would recognize and take full advantage of any brief opportunity to end it prematurely, should one be presented. It is a given that we should protect ourselves and our families, and stay out of the way of law enforcement, and not cause further chaos, but I would hope that in such a situation, should an opportunity present itself that I could do something to save another or a stranger, that I would not fail to act, but flee instead of facing the potential danger.
TimSr is offline  
Old December 7, 2015, 10:20 AM   #22
Hiker 1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 596
Good thing Jeanne Assam didn't Run or Hide...

"I took cover. I identified myself. I engaged him. I took him down."
Hiker 1 is offline  
Old December 7, 2015, 10:38 AM   #23
JimPage
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 21, 2010
Location: Rome, NY
Posts: 941
It's hard to prepare for the unexpected and each event will be different, so it's a theoretical event we prepare. But, taking cover and taking advantage of every opportunity to take a shooter out is the best we can do. If you can escape, that is not a cowardly thing to do.
__________________
Jim Page

Cogito, ergo armatum sum
JimPage is offline  
Old December 7, 2015, 10:51 AM   #24
g.willikers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2008
Posts: 10,442
Anyone who is has made up their minds and is willing to help stop evil best have the skills to back up their intentions.
If those skills are lacking, there's no better time to get started acquiring them than right now.
__________________
Walt Kelly, alias Pogo, sez:
“Don't take life so serious, son, it ain't nohow permanent.”
g.willikers is offline  
Old December 7, 2015, 10:57 AM   #25
adamBomb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 19, 2015
Location: coastal NC
Posts: 645
as you said - do not go back or try to engage an attacker unless you have no choice. Best case is you stop them, worst case is that you are another person with a gun that gets shot by police or another person with ccw that doesnt know you are not the bad guy.

always plan an escape route when you enter a new place - like a movie theatre, work, etc. I do this everywhere. It takes 1 min to say where would I run, where are escape routes, where could you hide, what could you use for a weapon. being aware of your surroundings is huge and try to place yourself in a position that you could escape if something happened.

Be aware of your surroundings and the people around you. who doesnt look right? what doesnt look right?

if you can hide, shut/lock doors. turn off lights. act as if no one is there - this is pretty much the only thing i can do at my university. I also carry pepper spray. guns are a no no

other things you can do to prepare...

practice shooting...

know how to fight...mma is probably the best out there - its a combination of brazilian jiu jitsu, muay thai, wreslting, and boxing. most other martial arts are not usually very good. Some realistic SD ones like krav can be good but there are many bad schools for each good one which is why I always suggest MMA.
adamBomb is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07048 seconds with 8 queries