May 11, 2013, 06:51 PM | #1 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 9, 2013
Posts: 70
|
50 grain 9mm 2,000 FPS
Anyone ever used any of this Liberty ultra defense Usm4 ammo?
Says 2000fps 450 fpe ultra fragmentation 12" depth and 5" width @ 25 meters Just curious is anyone has shot this ammo and how it shoots! |
May 11, 2013, 07:55 PM | #2 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2004
Location: Redwood City, Ca.
Posts: 4,114
|
I've never heard of them or this round. But when I read what they say about their ammo I become a bit suspicious...
Quote:
I don't know what a monolithic hollowpoint is, I've never heard of it. While the bullets do not have a lead core they do not say what they are made of. The claim that they outperform traditional ammo in all ways ("all metrics") is a big claim. The manufacturer claims that they are so revolutionary, apparently, that the DOD has kept them secret until now. Now is a good time though to declassify them and tailor them for the civilian market. Further they say: Quote:
Usually we read about such breakthroughs in reputable magazines and websites. When I first see them in advertisements I'm skeptical of the claims. Buy some and try it out! tipoc |
||
May 11, 2013, 07:59 PM | #3 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 9, 2013
Posts: 70
|
Oh no doubt I just bought two boxs. I'll shoot one box and if they perform ill keep the other box. If I don't like them I'll sell the other box to an ammo hoarder.
|
May 11, 2013, 08:12 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 3,829
|
Somebody asked about that same ammo just last week, so I'll cut-and-paste my same answer:
I'm not specifically familiar with Liberty Ultra Defense, but it looks like they're another one of those super-fast, super-lightweight, frangible-bullet designs. There's a couple of problems with those. First, the bullet is often made from a pressed-together materiel so it will fragment in soft tissue or through walls. But this materiel is also usually much more susceptible to moisture: I had a friend who carried some RCBD ammo for about a year and when he went to shoot it his gun blew up after four rounds. It turned out that moisture had infiltrated the case and caused the kaboom. The other problem is that the bullet often performs unreliably through heavy clothing and is much more easily deflected by bone and such. I'm sure there are times when a super-fast, super-lightweight, frangible 9mm bullet outperforms a more traditional hollow point, but this performance tends to be less reliable. There's a reason why almost all federal and state law enforcement agencies use traditional hollow points.
__________________
0331: "Accuracy by volume." |
May 11, 2013, 08:15 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2004
Location: Redwood City, Ca.
Posts: 4,114
|
I poked around some and I found this review of the ammo on another forum:
http://www.gunnook.com/content.php?3...SM4-Range-Test The tester bought a box and fired it from his Taurus 740 slim at some water jugs. His chrono had the speed at 2023fps. The first jug exploded and the round penetrated 3 jugs and broke apart. He tried some of the 9mm from another gun and it broke apart on the way to the target. But read the test and see for yourself. Buy a box and test and read. I don't yet see where the ammo was made. The ads remind me of the ads for Extreme Shok!!! ammo. tipoc Last edited by tipoc; May 11, 2013 at 08:22 PM. |
May 11, 2013, 09:06 PM | #6 | |
Junior member
Join Date: May 9, 2013
Posts: 70
|
Quote:
I guess that doesn't matter however if the .40 would come apart I suppose the 9mm could/would. It coming apart may or may not be a bad thing. None the less I appreciate your input. I picked these up at 20 bucks a box,the guy gave me a deal as I was buying a few other things and I was from out of town and drove a couple hours to visit his store and have dinner close by at a seafood restaurant that's super killer good! Man I love fresh fish and crab!!!! |
|
May 11, 2013, 09:12 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2005
Location: E Tennessee
Posts: 828
|
Quote:
|
|
May 11, 2013, 10:04 PM | #8 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 9, 2013
Posts: 70
|
That's what I was thinking about my next Glock maybe I'll wait until generation 5 or 6 maybe they really will be perfect by then. Glock perfection we can only hope
|
May 11, 2013, 10:25 PM | #9 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
When an ad sounds like it was written by Gecko45, it's (lack of) validity should be self-evident.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
May 11, 2013, 10:43 PM | #10 | |
Junior member
Join Date: May 9, 2013
Posts: 70
|
Quote:
Maybe Tiptoc could post a link to where he found that description. |
|
May 11, 2013, 10:43 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 8, 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,820
|
These are nothing new.fragmentation rounds have been around at least since the 70's. They were not very popular after the early 80's and have recently been making their way back.
They are made to break apart and send tiny shrapnel into the target. Unfortunately they are less effective than they would have you believe. As far as speed, think about the bullet weight. They are almost half the weight of a .380 with the full load of a 9mm. That's not a heavy round. A normal round from a 9mm is the 124 grn and most range from 115 grn to 147. 124 being pretty average for a 9mm is more than twice the grn of a 50grn bullt. about 146% more give or take 1 or 2. A .22 is about 35 grn and travels @ about 1700fps. Just add 15grn of weight and more than double powder and you have 2000fps. Stick with the Hollow Point
__________________
If you ever have to use a firearm, you don't get to pick the scenario! |
May 11, 2013, 10:57 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 30, 2013
Posts: 1,037
|
seems a bit gimmicky. the 50 grain in that diameter will have terrible sectional density (bad penetration) and bad ballistic coefficient. Coupled with the fact that the round is meant to fragment, it will not penetrate well.
Also remember "ballistics gel" isn't a human body. 12'' of penetration, in ballistics gel could equal zero penetration in a human body, if a light, weakly constructed bullet hits the ribs or another bone and doesn't make it through. A 50 grain .22wmr @ 1700fps could potentially be more effective than a 50 grain 9mm @ 2000fps. The 9mm will have more muzzle energy because of the faster initial velocity but the bullet still has a worse SD than a 50 gr. 22 and a worse BC so it will not penetrate as well and it will lose velocity faster. |
May 11, 2013, 11:21 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 10, 2012
Posts: 1,059
|
50 grain 9mm 2,000 FPS
The only testimonial I've heard was a gushing reference that Joe Teti made in an interview. The interview was in a couple of YouTube videos by Captain Berz, called "Joe Teti Talks Tactical". Joe was a Force Recon Marine, then left to join Army SF, and eventually some secretive counter terrorism unit. He has 20+ years of special operations experience. Quite a resume. At some point in the video, Joe mentions the Liberty rounds, and pretty much raves about their real world performance.
Take it for what it is... Anecdotal. |
May 11, 2013, 11:29 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 4, 2008
Location: WI
Posts: 3,656
|
Quote:
__________________
E-Shock rounds are engineered to expend maximum energy into soft targets, turning the density mass into an expanding rotational cone of NyTrilium matrix particles, causing neurological collapse to the central nervous system.- Yeah I can do that. I guarantee you will know it if a bicyclist hits your house going 1000 mph. -Smaug |
|
May 11, 2013, 11:37 PM | #15 | |
Junior member
Join Date: May 9, 2013
Posts: 70
|
Quote:
Looks like the website says the are made of nickel plated copper. |
|
May 11, 2013, 11:45 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 9, 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,212
|
Only available to the military eh? I thought they didn't use HP ammo. I guess only available doesn't mean they actually bought any.
__________________
Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus |
May 11, 2013, 11:47 PM | #17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 10, 2012
Posts: 1,059
|
50 grain 9mm 2,000 FPS
Quote:
Sometimes, people say good things because that's really how they feel. |
|
May 12, 2013, 12:16 AM | #18 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 9, 2013
Posts: 70
|
Here is a YouTube video of the round penetrating drywall and then in a seperate test it penetrates 4 layers of denim breaks a pork rib and creates a massive wound channel. Watch how the whole pork set-up and 2x4's move when it's hit by the bullet.
http://youtu.be/B9G0Je8z9J0 |
May 12, 2013, 12:43 AM | #19 |
Member
Join Date: April 23, 2013
Posts: 68
|
My name is.......
Sorry if I missed it, but did anybody mention "Mag Safe" 60g 9mm at 1800 FPS.
My famous last statement is "Go BIG, or go home" |
May 12, 2013, 01:49 AM | #20 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2004
Location: Redwood City, Ca.
Posts: 4,114
|
Quote:
http://www.tactical-life.com/product...-defense-ammo/ here... http://www.guns4sale.net/usm4/catalo...oduct_id=94730 and here... http://libertyammunition.com/products/ There is more. There are also more tests of the ammo on line. On the ammo that came apart on the way to the target, that is it blew apart after it left the barrel and before hitting the paper target, the reviewer I posted before said: Quote:
The homepage for this ammo states: Quote:
If you read nothing else but the text of the ads you may wanna pass on this stuff. tipoc |
|||
May 12, 2013, 02:19 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2004
Location: Redwood City, Ca.
Posts: 4,114
|
Here is a ballistic gel penetration test of the 9mm ammo which was sponsered by Liberty Ammo.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pip5jlpI3NY Note that the ammo penetrates the gel 1" then the bullet rapidly and explosively expands, splitting into pieces for an additional 3" of penetration, then the base of the round continues forward for a total penetration of 9". The ammo is a light weight hollow round with a thin base. Think of a light weight ball ammo with a hole drilled through it mounted on a thin base and that is about what this seems to be. Penetration is shallow with a wide pattern of explosive expansion. The bullet literally breaks to pieces 1 inch into the gel. tipoc |
May 12, 2013, 04:20 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 6, 2009
Location: Rocky Mountain West
Posts: 3,395
|
50 grain 9mm 2,000 FPS
MagSafe, Liberty, Extreme Shock, and similar ammunition choices make me feel very angry, because it couldn't be clearer that they're trying to sucker in the crowd that will be dazzled with mega-tactical terms and unrealistically grandiose claims.
In actual tests, these mega-futuristic, super-duper rounds always end up being made of mundane materials, unable to consistently perform in properly conducted tests. Speer Gold Dot has a small advertising budget, very plain-looking boxes. Why are they so successful? They create a product that works. No extra hype needed. I love and support the free market, but like anything/anyone I love it gets my goat on occasion. |
May 12, 2013, 07:38 AM | #23 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Also note in the video posted by Tipoc that they're only getting 1,800 fps.
|
May 12, 2013, 09:49 AM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 8, 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,820
|
Why did we start with frangible and move to Hallow Point?
Though it is possibly an accident, it still is confusing. Which round is the op truly referring to? The frangible or the HP? I know the OP named the Frangible to begin with. Did I miss something?
__________________
If you ever have to use a firearm, you don't get to pick the scenario! |
May 12, 2013, 09:58 AM | #25 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 9, 2013
Posts: 70
|
The first two links Tiptoc posted are not from the manufacturer. The last link posted doesn't make any wild claim. The typical defense round doesn't reliably expand at the distances liberty states.
The 1800 fps they are getting may be a result of a short barrel. The bullet breaking up after 1" penetration and leaving the tail end of the bullet intact may be a good thing. One bullet according to some guy on the Internet broke up on the way to the target. I like how you put all your faith in the negative with that one. If I threw away every brand of ammo I've had ONE failure with I probably wouldn't have any ammo left to shoot period. Nothing is 100% reliable and I don't think anyone would volunteer to take a liberty round. If hit in the ribs with that round one might get one piece coming out your toe and another out your shoulder. How large a piece hitting the spinal cord would stop a threat? While I can see why a person would not want or like the liberty round I do not understand all the hate and the over all attitude that the ammunition would be ineffective and hands down garbage. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|