|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 27, 2019, 01:19 PM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 18, 2009
Location: Central Colorado
Posts: 1,001
|
For those that are still reading, here is a fantastic article about the differences between QPQ nitride and chrome-lined bores:
https://faxonfirearms.com/blog/frequ...-chrome-lined/ Long story short, QPQ nitride (when done properly) is becoming superior to chrome-lined bores in almost all instances, save for sustained full-automatic fire. In regards to accuracy, I have both style barrels and both of them can easily shoot sub-MOA when given the right ammo and basic magnification. For all my follow-up builds I'll probably use Ballistic Advantage Hansen barrels. My CHF CL PSA barrel is fantastic, but equivalent (if not a teensy bit hetter) performance for a lower price is always a better option.
__________________
Those who hammer their swords into plow shares will plow for those who didn't... |
February 27, 2019, 10:04 PM | #27 |
Junior Member
Join Date: April 23, 2018
Posts: 3
|
From personal experience with all, I would take the FN over the Windham for the 16, and the Colt for the 20.
|
February 28, 2019, 06:42 AM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2012
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 6,876
|
Im still new to the understanding of done right . I know many ways a chrome lining can be wrong or not done well . How is a nitride done wrong or right and what is the issue if done wrong ?
__________________
If Jesus had a gun , he'd probably still be alive ! I almost always write my posts regardless of content in a jovial manor and intent . If that's not how you took it , please try again . |
|
|