The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 4, 2013, 12:55 PM   #1
Snake Plissken
Junior Member
 
Join Date: June 26, 2010
Posts: 5
SW M&P 22 vs Browning 1911-22 ?

looking to get one of these...
would like feed back from the members here on their experiences on one or both. eg reliability, functioning, pros and cons...know issues etc?

wanted to add the ruger SR22 into the mix but they arent allowed here in the great white north country of Cunukistan....due to barrel length

the gun will be predominately used by my kids and guests at my local gun range. mostly to get them used to shooting and introduce friends and family to the shooting sports.

thanks

Last edited by Snake Plissken; January 4, 2013 at 04:32 PM.
Snake Plissken is offline  
Old January 4, 2013, 05:00 PM   #2
ttarp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 4, 2013
Posts: 888
I've never shot or even held the M&P 22, but I do own the Browning 1911-22. It's scaled down from a fullsize 1911, and some people don't like them for that, but I don't find it inconvenient at all, I like the feel of the gun a lot, granted I have smaller hands. As far as function, it cycles smoothly and hasn't had a malfunction with any of the ammo I've shot through it. I think its overpriced, but it was just what I was looking for so I don't have any regrets.
ttarp is offline  
Old January 4, 2013, 11:08 PM   #3
USMCGrunt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2000
Location: Somewhere in 14T NT
Posts: 730
I'm on the other end of things. I have an M&P22 and I love it. Ya see, whuh happen wuz, I got my son a Ruger SR22 for himt to grow into. Of course I had to "test it" for him (that's the story I'm sticking with) and realized that, "dang, little .22s are FUN!" Well, since I have an M&P45, I decided to get one of these as well and I'm glad I did! Originally, I thought I might have Sig Mosquito problems with it so I decided to run 200 rounds of CCI Mini-mags through it for breaking in. Worked without a problem so I went over to using Wal-Mart bulk box Remington ammo. Ever since then, that's all she's been fed and hasn't missed a beat yet in probably close to a couple thousand rounds!
It's very close in size to the full size M&P and if mine was the small framed 9/40 M&P, it would be identical to a medium grip. The controls are the same as the full size pistol though and function the same. My M&P45 has the manual safety so the manual safety of the M&P22 doesn't bother me at all either. They do ride at a little more severe angle when on safe than the full sized model but it's not a show stopper. Granted I could have done without the engraved billboard on the side of the slide but that's just asthetics.
So now to the big question, how does she shoot? Like I said, the first 200 rounds were mini-mags just to check function and aide in the break-in process. Hmm, I kind of wonder if it would have even needed that though? Anyways, I didn't adjust the sights right away since I knew mini-mags was NOT going to be it's everyday diet but I was curious how she grouped. I fired these 5 rounds from 15m from a roll-over prone position without an artificial rest:





I don't have any pictures of the Remington golden bullet groups but as expected, they did open up a little bit but nothing major. Certainly not a problem for a plinker and low cost trainer. The .22LR runs a bit cheaper than .45 ACP even when reloading is factored in so that's another big plus for this pistol.
USMCGrunt is offline  
Old January 4, 2013, 11:58 PM   #4
Snake Plissken
Junior Member
 
Join Date: June 26, 2010
Posts: 5
thanks guys...maybe a few more can chime in also
Snake Plissken is offline  
Old January 6, 2013, 07:45 PM   #5
vossman
Member
 
Join Date: November 27, 2010
Posts: 25
I love my M&P22. I have 4-5 thousand through and it's just plain fun. Mine likes the Remington Golden and Blazer bulk. Trigger has really smoothed out, fits in a standard holster so there is not much not to like.
vossman is offline  
Old January 8, 2013, 11:11 PM   #6
TennJed
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 26, 2010
Posts: 1,536
I am interested in these 2 guns also. What materials are the slides
made of?
__________________
Find out just how tall I am
By jumping in the middle of a river
TennJed is offline  
Old January 9, 2013, 01:04 AM   #7
ttarp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 4, 2013
Posts: 888
Per the respective websites their both made from aircraft grade aluminum, Browning specifically states it to be 7075 T6 alloy, and I would hazard to assume the M&P is the same.
ttarp is offline  
Old January 9, 2013, 01:12 AM   #8
TennJed
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 26, 2010
Posts: 1,536
Quote:
Per the respective websites their both made from aircraft grade aluminum, Browning specifically states it to be 7075 T6 alloy, and I would hazard to assume the M&P is the same.
Excuse my ignorance, but would that be "pot metal" or a higher grade?
__________________
Find out just how tall I am
By jumping in the middle of a river
TennJed is offline  
Old January 9, 2013, 01:36 AM   #9
Bill DeShivs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 7, 2006
Posts: 10,966
What is commonly (and erroneously) referred to as "pot metal" is zinc alloy.
Aluminum is a much better material.
Real "pot metal" is cast irom, BTW.
__________________
Bill DeShivs, Master Cutler
www.billdeshivs.com
Bill DeShivs is offline  
Old January 9, 2013, 01:52 AM   #10
ttarp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 4, 2013
Posts: 888
Higher grade, not pot metal. It sees use in aircraft, rock climbing gear and other high quality applications.
ttarp is offline  
Old January 9, 2013, 09:11 AM   #11
TennJed
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 26, 2010
Posts: 1,536
Thanks guys. For some reason I was thinking the S&W was Zinc. Is the M&P made by Umarex? I was under the impression than Umarex made the 22lrs for S&W and Walther.
TennJed is offline  
Old January 9, 2013, 10:10 AM   #12
JWT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 16, 2007
Location: Southern Arizona
Posts: 3,888
I own both guns. They're nice shooting guns and either would be excellent for teaching kids.

The M&P seems to be made out of 'pot metal' but has held up quite well and is a fun little gun to shoot. Mine has several thousand rounds through it. Take down and reassembly are easy. It is made by Walther for S&W.

The Browning 1911-22 is also a fun little shooter. It is about 80 percent size of a normal 1911 and the internals are similar as is take down. It is a much higher quality than the M&P in my opinion.

I'd recommend either for range shooting with children. Both guns have been completely reliable and have never malfunctioned. I use primarily CCI Blazer or Federal bulk pack ammo when I shoot them.

Last edited by JWT; January 9, 2013 at 10:26 AM.
JWT is offline  
Old January 9, 2013, 10:50 AM   #13
Fishbed77
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 23, 2010
Posts: 4,862
Quote:
For some reason I was thinking the S&W was Zinc. Is the M&P made by Umarex? I was under the impression than Umarex made the 22lrs for S&W and Walther.
The M&P-22 (like the "Walther" P22) is made by Umarex. The slide is made of a zinc alloy that sometimes goes by the trade name "Zamak," which is commonly known as potmetal. This is a lower-quality material than the aluminum used by some other pistols like the Ruger SR22 or Browning 1911-22.
Fishbed77 is offline  
Old January 9, 2013, 10:58 AM   #14
Mr_Jumper
Member
 
Join Date: October 11, 2012
Posts: 76
I can chime in for M&P 22.

So far I've put through CCI standard, CCI mini-mag, Winchester bulk and federal bulk, around 2000 rounds in all. Great little shooter, quite accurate (for 22 pistol) and it's just fun to shoot. Very similar to M&P 9mm in size (compared at LGS prior to purchase), grips are not adjustable but about the same size as medium grip on 9mm.
Mr_Jumper is offline  
Old January 9, 2013, 11:30 AM   #15
TennJed
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 26, 2010
Posts: 1,536
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fishbed77 View Post
The M&P-22 (like the "Walther" P22) is made by Umarex. The slide is made of a zinc alloy that sometimes goes by the trade name "Zamak," which is commonly known as potmetal. This is a lower-quality material than the aluminum used by some other pistols like the Ruger SR22 or Browning 1911-22.
The S&W website list aluminum as the slide material.
TennJed is offline  
Old January 9, 2013, 11:31 AM   #16
915A
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 464
I am looking at the M&P or the SR22 for target shooting. The M&P gets good reviews from what I have read, but the comments on material are concerning.
__________________
"I have a very strict gun control policy: if there's a gun around, I want to be in control of it."
Clint Eastwood
915A is offline  
Old January 9, 2013, 11:40 AM   #17
TennJed
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 26, 2010
Posts: 1,536
Quote:
Originally Posted by 915A View Post
I am looking at the M&P or the SR22 for target shooting. The M&P gets good reviews from what I have read, but the comments on material are concerning.
Yeah the material confusion concerns me too. After reading the post here I checked the website and it does list aircraft aluminum. I have seen lots of post on different forums saying it is zinc. Not sure where people are getting this info. I would think the actual S&W website is correct
TennJed is offline  
Old January 9, 2013, 02:32 PM   #18
TacticalDefense1911
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 4, 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,277
The M&P22's slide is aluminum. I own one and the manufacturers website lists it as aluminum. Reader beware on many internet forums. Its not potmetal.

I really like my M&P22. Its for all intents and purposes the same size as my FS M&P 9mm and fits in my kydex holsters. The trigger is better then the FS guns from the factory as well. It has been extremely reliable using a wide variety of ammunition. Its also very accurate. Its been a good purchase so far. I've also heard very few issues with them from others, even ones with higher round counts.

The scaled down .22lr 1911's seem to be pretty decent guns. I hear more about reliability issues with them then the M&P22's but for the most part, the ones I've seen run pretty good. The M&P would be a better training platform for someone looking to move onto a striker fired type gun like an M&P or Glock. I'd give a slight nod to the M&P22 but it comes down to what platform you want.
TacticalDefense1911 is offline  
Old January 9, 2013, 02:46 PM   #19
TennJed
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 26, 2010
Posts: 1,536
Thanks tacticaldefense1911. Do you know if the M&P 22 is made by Umarex? Is it roll marked on who makes it?
TennJed is offline  
Old January 9, 2013, 03:08 PM   #20
Fishbed77
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 23, 2010
Posts: 4,862
Quote:
The S&W website list aluminum as the slide material.
Interesting - when introduced it was noted to be Zamak. If it is indeed aluminum, that is good news.
Fishbed77 is offline  
Old January 9, 2013, 03:29 PM   #21
h2otoo
Member
 
Join Date: October 29, 2012
Posts: 89
M&P 22 made by Walther. Very happy with mine.

Bob
h2otoo is offline  
Old January 9, 2013, 03:30 PM   #22
TacticalDefense1911
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 4, 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,277
Quote:
Thanks tacticaldefense1911. Do you know if the M&P 22 is made by Umarex? Is it roll marked on who makes it?
I believe it is. The frame is marked "Made in Germany" which could also be Walther but this has been discussed to great lengths and the consensus is that it is made by Umarex even though it is stamped Walther (Umarex owns Walther). There are proof marks on the slide that I believe are Umarex.
TacticalDefense1911 is offline  
Old January 10, 2013, 11:39 AM   #23
Fishbed77
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 23, 2010
Posts: 4,862
Quote:
the consensus is that it is made by Umarex even though it is stamped Walther (Umarex owns Walther). There are proof marks on the slide that I believe are Umarex.
Correct. This pistol is not made by Walther at the Walther factory in Ulm, Germany (where pistols such as the P99, PPQ, and PPS are made). It is made by Umarex at the Umarex factory in Arnsberg, Germany (outside Cologne). The proof marks bear this out.

Umarex has taken to stamping "Carl Walther" on a lot of their pistols, because, frankly, "Walther" sounds a lot better than "Umarex" (who is better known for airsoft toys and starting pistols).
Fishbed77 is offline  
Old January 10, 2013, 11:54 AM   #24
psyfly
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 27, 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 932
I have no experience with the M&P.

I am pleased enough with the Browning 1911-22. It feels like quality in the hand and I'm impressed with the fit and finish. As mentioned above, it is a bit pricey but I wanted one. Mine is the "compact" model with the wood grips; it's pretty.

It is small enough to carry as a BUG or as a primary when larger is not possible. I prefer it to my Beretta 950 simply because of the 10+1 capacity.

I've fired a couple dozen rounds though it, including some hand-fed Aguila powderless (they won't cycle) without problem and have even located a couple of spare magazines (for the price, Browning oughta stick in an extra, IMO).

Accuracy is so-so and definitely plinker-grade. I may upgrade my opinion when I've had more practice with it .

Fun level is quite good and I believe that it would make an excellent first-time trainer for kids.
I have large hands and the little pistol feels just fine to me.

Will
__________________
Show me the data
psyfly is offline  
Old January 11, 2013, 09:44 AM   #25
mrlizzzard
Junior Member
 
Join Date: December 16, 2012
Posts: 7
As an owner my m&p is great.I was lucked to get it as now they are more popular.Just buy it.
mrlizzzard is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07774 seconds with 10 queries