July 1, 2016, 09:27 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: January 3, 2016
Posts: 75
|
Brands of brass
Read an article awhile back somebody wrote saying they shot for ex. Brand a b and c brass with the same load combo....results were varied as much as 1.5 inches at 100 yards if i recall any expierences with this or something similiar?
|
July 1, 2016, 10:22 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 2, 2010
Location: Plainview , Long Island NY
Posts: 3,863
|
Didn't read the article but I could see it happening. Some cases may be thicker causing less volume & more neck tension. I like FC & ADI brass which is thicker then most, lower my charge 1 grain from loads listed In load book.
|
July 1, 2016, 11:28 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 4, 2011
Location: LA (Greater Los Angeles Area)
Posts: 2,598
|
Yes they vary. No surprise they group differently.
Follow this link and page down to the brass section. The explanation and charts will give you an idea of what the differences are/can be. http://www.accurateshooter.com/cartridge-guides/223rem/ Of course, what this means is that you must sort your brass, and it is desire-able to have many of a certain type. For example I will load any high end loads in once or twice fired LC brass. Federal, which are made of a softer bass formula, go into my generic, "any brass" low end loads bucket.
__________________
............ |
July 2, 2016, 12:02 AM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
|
CAUTION: The following post includes loading data beyond or not covered by currently published maximums for this cartridge. USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. Neither the writer, The Firing Line, nor the staff of TFL assume any liability for any damage or injury resulting from use of this information.
I just shared a first-hand example a few weeks ago (June 12 - the data was obtained June 8th). Here's the quote from that thread: Quote:
Do not try switching brass with established loads, at home.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
|
July 2, 2016, 07:41 AM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Posts: 7,249
|
Quote:
When finished he settled on 47 of the 500 cases. He was the only reloader/shooter/good shot I know of that considered the length of the powder column and the diameter of the powder column. Anyhow, I settled on sorting cases by head stamps and I was not going to shoot R-P and LC 30/06 cases with the same load because at the time there was .060” difference in the length of the powder column and I never got into that ‘repeat after me’ saying military brass is heavier because it is thicker because that is a half truth. F. Guffey |
|
July 2, 2016, 04:47 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: January 3, 2016
Posts: 75
|
Thanx guys....ive just been noticing the same thing as i reload more and more great info
|
July 2, 2016, 06:13 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 6, 2011
Location: Thornton, Texas
Posts: 3,998
|
Not trying to be a contrarian, but a couple of years ago I was testing 223 loads in a new rifle, and found a good accurate load. Just as an afterthought, I loaded up about 50 rounds in cases that I had put back for plinking by the grandkids. They were a mixed lot of several makes, some neck turned and fully prepped and some were not. Some had been reloaded a lot and some had not.
Ten shot groups with that brass were not as tightly arranged as groups from the 'good' brass were, but they weren't bad. Let's say they were a bit more dispersed, but for hunting purposes it wouldn't have mattered at all. They were surprisingly good. All shooting was at 100 yards. The 10 shot groups with the semi-retired brass ran about 1/4 larger. |
July 2, 2016, 06:42 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 18, 2011
Location: SE VA.
Posts: 216
|
30-06, 7mm Rem, 308, 243, all these, I sort by head stamp. 223 gets sorted for the bolt rifles but the AR ammo doesn't get sorted. No handgun brass gets sorted. That's what I do.
|
|
|