|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 30, 2010, 09:11 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: December 31, 2009
Location: pocatello,Id - rock springs,wy
Posts: 83
|
Suggestions on spotting scopes
what do you guys recommend as far as spotting scopes weight and money are both factors. I'm looking at scopes in the range of $300-$700 and trying to decide between the20-60x82 and the 16-45x65
__________________
To hunt the ghost in the darkness you must first find were he sleeps |
March 30, 2010, 09:37 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 18, 2005
Location: Central KY
Posts: 220
|
I hope you don't have to carry the size stated very far.
Is this for hunting or spotting at the range? |
March 30, 2010, 09:43 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 11, 2008
Posts: 2,350
|
These days, I dunno.
I'm using a 25x fixed power Leupold that gets me into more than enough trouble. How does it do that? By sending me on LOOOONNG journeys after animals that are so far away that it sometimes takes a half day to get into the same canyon with them. It really sux when that "couple of canyons over" turns out to be 10-15 miles. It's hard to believe how far away you can spot critters with a decent spotting scope. BTW-I read my reply to my wife, and she giggled. She's watched me take a couple of those jouneys. Daryl |
March 30, 2010, 10:18 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 18, 2005
Posts: 1,276
|
For the bench, I use a Leupold 20-60X80 Green Ring, $389.00 on Hayneedle. To carry in the field, I have a little Jason Model 346 20-50X50mm- $30.00 from a friend who doesn't use it anymore. Very light and surprisingly capable for a low-end spotting scope.
|
March 30, 2010, 10:32 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 24, 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 311
|
What brands are you looking at? Sharpness is more important than magnification; 60x is worthless if the image is hazy and fuzzy.
|
March 31, 2010, 01:26 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 30, 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 400
|
Generally, a larger objective is better; it gathers more light, making for a brighter, sharper image.
Unless the 82mm scope has much worse glass than the 65mm one, or the extra weight is a big problem, I'd take the 20-60x82. Last edited by Regolith; March 31, 2010 at 04:00 AM. |
March 31, 2010, 08:08 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: December 31, 2009
Location: pocatello,Id - rock springs,wy
Posts: 83
|
I've been looking at the nikons prostaff's, i have always loved my nikon optics but i'm open to other suggestions. This spoting scope will be on three backpacking trips this year and a horseback elk hunt thats why i was even considering the 16-48x65
__________________
To hunt the ghost in the darkness you must first find were he sleeps |
April 3, 2010, 12:26 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 11, 2009
Location: Hansen Idaho
Posts: 1,465
|
I have a 20X I think is what it is. I got it off ebay, but you can sometimes find them around town for about the same price. I was less than 20.00 for mine. It isnt all that great but it is light and small and lets you see farther than the 10 X bino's. Plus if a horse rolls on it your not out much. Its a Bushnell. I think I have seen one at the pawn shop on main in old town.
__________________
* (Swinging club) Whack! whack! whack! * Nope, the old nag's still dead . (Capt Charlie) |
April 3, 2010, 09:14 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 24, 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 311
|
82mm is going to be a pretty big scope, I think you would want a lighter one for backpacking.
I took the cheap 20-60x zoom eyepiece off my cheap scope and put on a fixed 20x; it's much sharper now. Nikon is good brand, they shouldn't have that problem. |
April 3, 2010, 11:59 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
|
Very portable variable spotting scopes for hunting (lighter weight, compact):
http://burrisoptics.com/compactspot.html http://www.leupold.com/hunting-and-s...ng-12-40x60mm/ Traditional spotting scopes (heavier, bulkier, you may need to take the neighbor's kid along to carry it): http://www.bushnell.com/products/sco.../elite/780080/ http://www.leupold.com/hunting-and-s...ia-15-45x60mm/ Outrageous spotting scopes (definitely see way out there): http://burrisoptics.com/xts2575spot.html
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs. But what do I know? Summit Arms Services |
April 3, 2010, 12:18 PM | #11 |
Staff In Memoriam
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
|
As for what to buy, i have NO CLUE!!!
I will say that I can see the difference in optical quality and my vision has gone down hill badly in the last 10 years... As for objective lens size, I would say that for a hunting spotter scope you don't need the same thing as for long range target shooting. Keep in mind that those folks need to see the dinky hole in paper at several hundred yards to make corrections. You only need to see the animal to make the decision to shoot or not shoot. You don't need to count the dingle berries on the tick's butt. Large scopes not only take up alot of space but are harder to protect from falls as well as being quite heavy compared to a smaller unit... GLASS IS HEAVY STUFF!!! Brent |
|
|