The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old August 2, 2020, 09:21 PM   #51
taylorce1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 7,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by Double K
I didn't have buck tag but my wife did, we saw bucks we'd never seen before at my place, mid-morning my wife shot a buck three times with her 7-08 and when he finally made it to fence and looked like he might jump it I gave one with my 7 short mag and dropped him. 
How is "I didn't have a buck tag" a like license? The only way you could have a like license is to have a buck tag for the exact same GMU. You would also have to claim that buck you shot as your deer with the carcass tag.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Double K
I had what's called a like license, perfectly legal to kill an already mortally wounded animal to prevent loss
And I get accused of "changing the narrative"!
__________________
NRA Life Member

Last edited by taylorce1; August 2, 2020 at 09:27 PM.
taylorce1 is offline  
Old August 3, 2020, 12:34 AM   #52
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 21,731
Quote:
Agree, but the argument carried far enough ends up at a pea shooter.
Agreed, and if you carry it far enough in the other direction, it ends up with nuclear weapons.

Both are on the far side of ridiculous.

Quote:
we all know the .300 Whisper will not do what the .30-378 Wby will do.
If the question is "will it kill an elk?" The answer is yes.

Beyond that, you're talking specifics and comparing abilities in differing situations. There is no "deader" than dead. How much work and effort the hunter has to do in order to make that elk dead varies considerably with the tool used. Pointed stick, bow& arrow, muzzle loader, light, medium, heavy rifle handgun, rock, knife, or any other tool you use, all can, and have killed elk. The difference is the effort needed and what the range of optimal conditions is.

Nobody needs a powerful magnum rifle to kill an elk, but they sure give you a lot more options than other tools.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Old August 3, 2020, 04:51 PM   #53
reynolds357
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2012
Posts: 5,411
Dead is dead. How quickly incapacitation occurs is what I am concerned with.
reynolds357 is offline  
Old August 3, 2020, 05:56 PM   #54
taylorce1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 7,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by reynolds357
Dead is dead. How quickly incapacitation occurs is what I am concerned with.
That has more to do with shot placement and bullet used than amount of powder burned. Regardless of cartridge used you have to understand the limitations and or abilities of their cartridge of choice.
__________________
NRA Life Member
taylorce1 is offline  
Old August 3, 2020, 06:24 PM   #55
reynolds357
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2012
Posts: 5,411
Quote:
Originally Posted by taylorce1 View Post
That has more to do with shot placement and bullet used than amount of powder burned. Regardless of cartridge used you have to understand the limitations and or abilities of their cartridge of choice.
Shot placement is a given. Deer dont go down and stay if you shoot them in the hoof. I use proper bullet for application. Powder burned has everything to do with incapacitation. I have shot deer with 7-30 Waters and with 7 Rum. No comparison in the two. I have shot deer with a .30-30 and with a .30/338 Lapua. No comparison.
I have shot deer with a 6.5x55 and a 6.5 x 300 Wby. Again, no comparison.
All well placed shots. All bullets matched to the game and velocity fired at.
reynolds357 is offline  
Old August 3, 2020, 10:11 PM   #56
Colorado Redneck
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 6, 2008
Location: Northeast Colorado
Posts: 1,804
These "discussions" almost always end up being more about opinion and personal preference than answering the question posed in the beginning. Usually interesting, seldom useful.
Colorado Redneck is offline  
Old August 4, 2020, 01:34 AM   #57
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 21,731
Quote:
These "discussions" almost always end up being more about opinion and personal preference than answering the question posed in the beginning.
The OP asked for opinions.

I'd say he got some.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Old August 4, 2020, 12:41 PM   #58
Double K
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2020
Location: Colorado
Posts: 205
Most people rarely shoot enough to become great shots, everyone thinks they are however even if the last time they pulled trigger on their trusty elk rifle was last year the week before the season like they always do. Shooting is a perishable skill, natural shooters are a myth, firearms haven't been around all that long in human history.
The good news is elk are big targets, if your any kind of shot at all you can probably hit one inside 100yds, last time I read the numbers from CPW they said the average elk was shot at 70yds, overall success rates were about 14%.
It's just as easy to jerk the trigger or make some other mistake shooting a 7-08 as it is to using a 7mag. Contrary to what people say on the internet a bad shot with a magnum is better than a bad shot with non-magnum. the animal is wounded in both cases but the shock of a high velocity bullet may buy you a couple of seconds for a follow up shot.
Double K is offline  
Old August 4, 2020, 01:17 PM   #59
Tallest
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 23, 2016
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
Posts: 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by Double K View Post
Most people rarely shoot enough to become great shots... It's just as easy to jerk the trigger or make some other mistake shooting a 7-08 as it is to using a 7mag. Contrary to what people say on the internet a bad shot with a magnum is better than a bad shot with non-magnum. the animal is wounded in both cases but the shock of a high velocity bullet may buy you a couple of seconds for a follow up shot.
If I may make a minor counter point...

Since we seem to be talking about shooters at large rather than individual examples, I think it's important to note that those who practice tend to do better than those who don't, and those who practice a lot tend to do better than those who practice a little...

I live in Virginia where the whitetail deer are the vast majority of our "large game." In most counties, shooting a deer 200 lbs or more is a big deal. So my 7-08 is more than sufficient. It is also the lightest shooting cartridge I've ever hunted with. It's extremely comfortable to shoot, so I've also practiced with it drastically more than I ever practiced with the 30-06, the 300 Win mag, or the 7mm mag.

So I'm more comfortable shooting it, and I'm more familiar with what it will and won't do. As such, I am better equipped hunting deer or elk with it than I would be with something that makes me angry after 5-10 shots of practice. (I could also add that those who reload, and are on a budget, can afford to practice more with something that doesn't use magnum level consumables.)

I'm not disputing that magnums do more damage (at range), that is a given. But I don't thing their destructive advantage trumps the other advantages to be found in other factors.
__________________
Matthew

"This is God's universe, and he has a plan. You might think that you have a better plan, but you don't have a universe." - Dr. J.V. McGee
Tallest is offline  
Old August 4, 2020, 01:32 PM   #60
taylorce1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 7,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by reynolds357
Shot placement is a given. Deer dont go down and stay if you shoot them in the hoof. I use proper bullet for application. Powder burned has everything to do with incapacitation.
I've seen animals go down like the earth reached up and slapped them with tiny cartridges. I've also seen them make a death dash with lungs hanging out the exit wound, much farther than you'd imagine from much larger cartridges. However, I never said that a smaller cartridge hits as hard as a much larger one.

My point all along is the 7-08 is an adequate elk (or deer) cartridge, not the perfect one. IMO there is no perfect elk cartridge, and if we'd stop looking for one and just go use what we have we'd all probably be more successful elk hunters. I wasted a lot of money and time trying to pair the perfect cartridge for the game I was pursuing. Which I've decided in recent years trying to do is the definition of insanity as well.

So if you're using a relatively common idea of using 1500 lb-ft of energy to kill elk, then the 7-08 is effectively a 375 yard rifle with a 140 bullet. That means the if you use the 7mm RM with the same energy requirement and bullet you've effectively extended the usable range by about 175 yards. Say you're a hunter that just wants 1800 fps minimum impact velocity to make sure your bullet expands properly, now you've extended the effective range of the 7mm-08 to roughly 650 yards, but the 7mm RM with the same bullet only gets your an extra 175 yards again. Pretty much you can pick any number you want between the two using the same 140 grain bullet and it only equals 175 yard head start for the 7mm RM.

Are you going to have to pass on some shots using a 7mm-08 vs. using a larger cartridge? Absolutely, but knowing which shots you can take and knowing when to pass is also part of being a mature hunter. However, just because you're using a larger cartridge doesn't mean you can take any shot presented as well.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Ballistic Calculators - 7-08 - Copy.pdf (327.9 KB, 0 views)
File Type: pdf Ballistic Calculators - 7mm RM.pdf (344.5 KB, 0 views)
__________________
NRA Life Member

Last edited by taylorce1; August 4, 2020 at 01:38 PM.
taylorce1 is offline  
Old August 4, 2020, 02:08 PM   #61
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 21,731
Quote:
However, just because you're using a larger cartridge doesn't mean you can take any shot presented as well.
This is something that sadly, too many people don't recognize. Just because you have a rifle that has the energy to take game at 600yards doesn't mean you can, or should shoot at game that far away.

I've always been in agreement with the old school gun writer (though I forget which one it was) who said that if you ever shoot a big game animal at more than 300 yards, you should have to write yourself a letter, longhand, in triplicate (no carbon paper) explaining exactly WHY you HAD to take that shot.

Some will defend taking foolishly long shots with "I'm a good shot" or "the rifle will do it", or often "I couldn't get any closer".

TO which I ask, did you even try to get closer??

Too many people focus too much only on shooting when they should focus more on hunting. (and by hunting I mean stalking and getting close enough to the game animal to be within the easily usable range of their weapon to becertain of a humane kill.)
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Old August 4, 2020, 02:42 PM   #62
reynolds357
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2012
Posts: 5,411
Quote:
Originally Posted by 44 AMP View Post
This is something that sadly, too many people don't recognize. Just because you have a rifle that has the energy to take game at 600yards doesn't mean you can, or should shoot at game that far away.

I've always been in agreement with the old school gun writer (though I forget which one it was) who said that if you ever shoot a big game animal at more than 300 yards, you should have to write yourself a letter, longhand, in triplicate (no carbon paper) explaining exactly WHY you HAD to take that shot.

Some will defend taking foolishly long shots with "I'm a good shot" or "the rifle will do it", or often "I couldn't get any closer".

TO which I ask, did you even try to get closer??

Too many people focus too much only on shooting when they should focus more on hunting. (and by hunting I mean stalking and getting close enough to the game animal to be within the easily usable range of their weapon to becertain of a humane kill.)
Why should I be limited by someones opinion of how far I should shoot. The last deer I missed or lost was in the 1980's. Most deer I shoot are over 400 yards. My longest is 760 laser ranged. People I hunt with miss deer at under 100 yards. Am I irresponsible or are they?
reynolds357 is offline  
Old August 4, 2020, 05:25 PM   #63
Double K
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2020
Location: Colorado
Posts: 205
I shot this little buck a couple of years ago after he licked the rung on my treestand, is that close enough? Btw, I jack the poundage up as high as I can and still draw the bow because I want the arrow to go completely through every time just like a bullet should, makes blood trails much shorter, use enough gun or bow.
Double K is offline  
Old August 5, 2020, 10:49 AM   #64
stagpanther
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 2, 2014
Posts: 7,435
Nice--I have a carbon knight. Somebody did a study on arrows and came to the conclusion that as long as the range is good you don't need to crank the draw up--mine is set at about 50 lbs.
__________________
If you’re ever hiking in the woods and you get lost, just look up and find the brightest star in the sky and you’ll know which way space is.
I am NOT an expert--I do not have any formal experience or certification in firearms use or testing; use any information I post at your own risk!
stagpanther is offline  
Old August 5, 2020, 11:45 AM   #65
Double K
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2020
Location: Colorado
Posts: 205
I have my Diamond set at 60lbs, been trying to get a cow elk with it but I hunt a small property where it's hard to catch them on if your working everyday.
Just like rifles you can kill deer and elk with very light poundage bows or small guns if everything is perfect, Murphy has a way with showing up at all the wrong times however. I wouldn't consider a 50lb bow as light weight especially a compound, you should be able to shoot through any undulate with a good broadhead at reasonable distances.
I use one piece Montec G5 carbon broadheads because I bought into the expandable fad when they came out, one hit on a big mule deer shoulder blade convinced me they might work flawlessly on perfect behind the shoulder shots but can come apart when hitting bone. I have what's left of that expandable somewhere around here, there were pieces of it scattered everywhere in the meat. The butcher found most of them and wasn't happy about it.

Is a Bowtech Carbon Knight the same as the Diamond SB1?, they look the alot alike, if I'm not mistaken Diamond is made by Bowtech, their economy line.

Last edited by Double K; August 5, 2020 at 11:55 AM.
Double K is offline  
Old August 6, 2020, 04:37 PM   #66
Don Fischer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 2, 2017
Posts: 1,713
Quote:
Originally Posted by taylorce1 View Post
I've seen animals go down like the earth reached up and slapped them with tiny cartridges. I've also seen them make a death dash with lungs hanging out the exit wound, much farther than you'd imagine from much larger cartridges. However, I never said that a smaller cartridge hits as hard as a much larger one.

My point all along is the 7-08 is an adequate elk (or deer) cartridge, not the perfect one. IMO there is no perfect elk cartridge, and if we'd stop looking for one and just go use what we have we'd all probably be more successful elk hunters. I wasted a lot of money and time trying to pair the perfect cartridge for the game I was pursuing. Which I've decided in recent years trying to do is the definition of insanity as well.

So if you're using a relatively common idea of using 1500 lb-ft of energy to kill elk, then the 7-08 is effectively a 375 yard rifle with a 140 bullet. That means the if you use the 7mm RM with the same energy requirement and bullet you've effectively extended the usable range by about 175 yards. Say you're a hunter that just wants 1800 fps minimum impact velocity to make sure your bullet expands properly, now you've extended the effective range of the 7mm-08 to roughly 650 yards, but the 7mm RM with the same bullet only gets your an extra 175 yards again. Pretty much you can pick any number you want between the two using the same 140 grain bullet and it only equals 175 yard head start for the 7mm RM.

Are you going to have to pass on some shots using a 7mm-08 vs. using a larger cartridge? Absolutely, but knowing which shots you can take and knowing when to pass is also part of being a mature hunter. However, just because you're using a larger cartridge doesn't mean you can take any shot presented as well.
Super post. let me add one thing. I have never ever in my entire life seen a shot I had to take! Never have been charged by a dangerous animal!
Don Fischer is offline  
Old August 6, 2020, 06:06 PM   #67
Double K
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2020
Location: Colorado
Posts: 205
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallest View Post
If I may make a minor counter point...

Since we seem to be talking about shooters at large rather than individual examples, I think it's important to note that those who practice tend to do better than those who don't, and those who practice a lot tend to do better than those who practice a little...

I live in Virginia where the whitetail deer are the vast majority of our "large game." In most counties, shooting a deer 200 lbs or more is a big deal. So my 7-08 is more than sufficient. It is also the lightest shooting cartridge I've ever hunted with. It's extremely comfortable to shoot, so I've also practiced with it drastically more than I ever practiced with the 30-06, the 300 Win mag, or the 7mm mag.

So I'm more comfortable shooting it, and I'm more familiar with what it will and won't do. As such, I am better equipped hunting deer or elk with it than I would be with something that makes me angry after 5-10 shots of practice. (I could also add that those who reload, and are on a budget, can afford to practice more with something that doesn't use magnum level consumables.)

I'm not disputing that magnums do more damage (at range), that is a given. But I don't thing their destructive advantage trumps the other advantages to be found in other factors.
You make some good points however as to practice I don't know a single hunter who practices with their big game rifle enough to be a really good shot, not one and I know a lot because of my job. I'm sure there are a few but you would have to have your own personal range and have the time, money and discipline to practice weekly. Normal hunters just don't do that including myself, what lots of people who want to be very good shots do is shoot an air rifle every day or shoot 22lr on the weekends. When your practicing with those gun it really doesn't matter how hard your big game rifle kicks.
Whenever I'm taking someone on a big game hunt I tell them to dry fire everyday from a bi-pod or whatever portable rest they carry for a couple of weeks before going on the hunt, that makes a huge difference.
Double K is offline  
Old Yesterday, 12:45 PM   #68
Tallest
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 23, 2016
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
Posts: 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by Double K View Post
You make some good points however as to practice I don't know a single hunter who practices with their big game rifle enough to be a really good shot, not one and I know a lot because of my job. I'm sure there are a few but you would have to have your own personal range and have the time, money and discipline to practice weekly. Normal hunters just don't do that including myself, what lots of people who want to be very good shots do is shoot an air rifle every day or shoot 22lr on the weekends. When your practicing with those gun it really doesn't matter how hard your big game rifle kicks.
Whenever I'm taking someone on a big game hunt I tell them to dry fire everyday from a bi-pod or whatever portable rest they carry for a couple of weeks before going on the hunt, that makes a huge difference.
I don't disagree with your assessment, but I absolutely disagree that it's an acceptable standard. If I am going to use a weapon to take a life, even an animal life, I personally feel obligated to take the necessary measures to be 100% confident in my ability to take the shots I choose. To me, that means practicing with gun I am going to use at the ranges I am going to be using it. Yes, mechanics of shooting should be honed to a razor's edge, but until I have shot X rifle at 400 yards, 600 yards, 800 yards, etc... until I know, through experience, how it drops, how it bucks the wind (or doesn't), I'm not going to take a shot at an animal at that distance.
__________________
Matthew

"This is God's universe, and he has a plan. You might think that you have a better plan, but you don't have a universe." - Dr. J.V. McGee
Tallest is offline  
Old Yesterday, 02:07 PM   #69
Double K
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2020
Location: Colorado
Posts: 205
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallest View Post
I don't disagree with your assessment, but I absolutely disagree that it's an acceptable standard. If I am going to use a weapon to take a life, even an animal life, I personally feel obligated to take the necessary measures to be 100% confident in my ability to take the shots I choose. To me, that means practicing with gun I am going to use at the ranges I am going to be using it. Yes, mechanics of shooting should be honed to a razor's edge, but until I have shot X rifle at 400 yards, 600 yards, 800 yards, etc... until I know, through experience, how it drops, how it bucks the wind (or doesn't), I'm not going to take a shot at an animal at that distance.
I don't like shooting much past 300yds with a rifle at live game and 7-08 can be sighted in with a maximum point blank range of 340yds so you can hold in the center of an animal to that range.
I don't know anyone personally that shoots at unwounded game much past 300yds, a real 300yds that is measured with a laser range finder.
I've met plenty of people who thought actual distances of 2-3-4-500 meters were double those distances.
Double K is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2018 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.11389 seconds with 10 queries