|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 31, 2010, 01:22 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 23, 2007
Posts: 1,030
|
Weaver VS Millet extended rings.
Another stupid "Comparison" topic, but I was wondering of the differances between, and if anyone has used the Weaver or Millet extended rings?
I'd like to use the Millets, being all-steel VS the Weaver's aluminum base, but the Millets are windage adjustable.....is that a bad deal? Or just loc-tite both sides? Thank you for your help. |
January 1, 2011, 07:39 AM | #2 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
|
I have and use both brands but I don't feel the Milletts are as solid as the Weavers. The Weaver has one solid locking side while the Milletts only have a "tab" with a screw thru it and can't provide the same stability. The Milletts do provide some horizontal adjustment if needed for centering your scope.
|
January 1, 2011, 11:26 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 19, 2007
Location: Montmorency Co, MI
Posts: 1,551
|
Use the one that fits your gun/scope best and accomplishes the reason you need extendeds.
|
January 1, 2011, 10:54 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 23, 2007
Posts: 1,030
|
I'll probably go Weaver. Thanks for the input.
|
|
|