The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The North Corral > Curios and Relics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old July 23, 2018, 01:33 PM   #1
'88Scrat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 11, 2011
Location: Kansas
Posts: 422
1903A3 Front Sight Hood

Just a quick question, is a 1903A3 Springfield supposed to have a front sight hood? I've had a surprisingly hard time finding a definitive answer on this looking online.

Some sources say yes, some say no, some say the USMC variants only, and some claim its temporary meant to be removed after transport.

Help?
__________________
BOOM
'88Scrat is offline  
Old July 23, 2018, 04:24 PM   #2
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 15,623
Quote:
its temporary meant to be removed after transport
My understanding.
No doubt target shooters used them to simulate a globe front sight, but I think the military took the hood off for combat.
Jim Watson is online now  
Old July 23, 2018, 08:16 PM   #3
sgms
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 30, 2010
Location: Arizona or Ohio depending
Posts: 1,020
From what I know the USMC used both sight protectors and sights hoods. The sight hood was used for target shooting only and the hood had a much larger ring allowing for a good sight picture while the sight protector was just large enough to protect the sight blade. Looked through the WW1 & 2 pictures I have ( a rather small sample) and of those that front sights can be seen clearly some of the rifles in combat still have the protectors on most don't, while the parade and drill photos show all of the rifles having them attached.
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg fullsizeoutput_4a71.jpeg (19.4 KB, 81 views)

Last edited by sgms; July 23, 2018 at 08:22 PM. Reason: added photo
sgms is offline  
Old July 23, 2018, 10:58 PM   #4
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 15,623
Fascinating. I've seen a lot of sight protectors but not the hood. The Marines always did it their way. The Marine 1903 sights had a single aperture drift slide and a taller, wider, undercut front blade. Better sight picture in peep mode and the taller blade brought the battle sight down to a more realistic 300 yards.
Jim Watson is online now  
Old July 23, 2018, 11:34 PM   #5
tangolima
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 2,180
Can the sight protector be taken off easily? Putting it on seems easier than taking it off. But it does look a certain way to damage the bluing around the front size regardless.

-TL

p.s. just looked it up online. It is actually quite easy. I may try it on my rifle.

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

Last edited by tangolima; July 23, 2018 at 11:43 PM.
tangolima is offline  
Old July 24, 2018, 08:21 PM   #6
leadhead2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: November 10, 2008
Location: Western Pa.
Posts: 9
It will scratch the hell out of your sight ring.
Denny
leadhead2 is offline  
Old September 17, 2018, 06:30 PM   #7
firewrench044
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 9, 2007
Location: Fort Pierce, Florida
Posts: 381
The marine sight hood is smaller, giving a better sight picture
Hard to find , but worth it
firewrench044 is offline  
Old September 17, 2018, 06:34 PM   #8
tangolima
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 2,180
I think it is the other way around. The Marines has bigger globe. It is rare and expensive.

-TL

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
tangolima is offline  
Old September 22, 2018, 05:19 PM   #9
gwpercle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 30, 2012
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Posts: 983
I bought a little used 1903-A3 from a Military Surplus store in the 1960's , it may not have even been issued. The front sight hood was on it , I've shot it with and without the hood in place and along with the peep rear sight I prefer the hooded front sight.
The rifle has been sporterized and a Weaver K-4 scope mounted....but the hood is still on the front sight.
Gary
gwpercle is online now  
Old October 15, 2018, 07:30 PM   #10
Randy A
Junior Member
 
Join Date: January 14, 2012
Location: Montana
Posts: 9
The Marine front sight hood is larger and made of heavier (hardened) steel. Unlike the standard hood it is not meant to be removed, when you install one or try to remove it you'll see why and they will scratch the heck out of the front sight base. Being larger and taller the tip of the front sight stays generally centered, regardless of the A thru E blades. There are pics out there for comparison (I don't feel like going through the post-a-pic process right now). Anyhow, these are not to be confused with the Marine #10 sights earlier mentioned, they did not use very many of those for very long. They only had an advantage under certain conditions and they realized it wasn't worth the hassle, eventually going back to the standard sights later on. The USMC hood was much more widely used than the #10 sights and was not exclusively a #10 sight accessory.
BTW as of the last couple years if you find original ones for less that $75/$80, it's a good deal
I got one years ago and it made such a difference I bought them for every 03/A3 I have, they're nice.

Last edited by Randy A; October 15, 2018 at 07:38 PM.
Randy A is offline  
Old February 21, 2019, 08:11 PM   #11
moose fat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2006
Location: Alaska, Yukon R. delta
Posts: 395
I realize this is an old post, but, I was looking for a front sight hood for my 03A3 and I got two. They are the protective ones that were usually pitched/thrown away. I found a gentleman that makes the Marine sized hood. I don't know if he still makes them.
Bill Bentz. [email protected] is his e mail address.
moose fat is offline  
Old February 22, 2019, 04:56 PM   #12
gwpercle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 30, 2012
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Posts: 983
Since this has popped up ... the 1903-A3 I bought in 1967 came with a little sheet metal hood that snaps on....nothing milled or fancy but it is as the government issued them.
Mine got sporterized but still has the factory barrel and the little hood in place , after 50 years .
Gun Parts Corporation used to have buckets of them...check with them if you want one,
Gary
gwpercle is online now  
Old March 6, 2019, 10:22 AM   #13
F. Guffey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Posts: 7,136
I have sight hoods for the 03, at one time I had 3 and then I gave one to a reloader, shooter, vet in North Carolina. I also sent him a box of home made 30/06 head space gages.

F. Guffey
F. Guffey is offline  
Old March 6, 2019, 10:35 AM   #14
hammered54
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2010
Location: Pinckney,Michigan
Posts: 118
I have sight hoods for the 03, at one time I had 3 and then I gave one to a reloader, shooter, vet in North Carolina. I also sent him a box of home made 30/06 head space gages.

F. Guffey



you don't check your p.m's ?
hammered54 is offline  
Old April 7, 2019, 10:39 AM   #15
R.FORTE
Junior Member
 
Join Date: March 20, 2019
Location: WA
Posts: 11
You can always check with Gun Parts great reference and these parts on hand
R.FORTE is offline  
Old May 2, 2019, 05:59 PM   #16
Chris_B
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 9, 2007
Posts: 3,098
you can take a sight cover and stretch hell out of it with a pair of needle nose pliers placed inside and muscled open. If you want to put in the effort. Reduces the scratching.

I'm not a 1930s or 1940s marine, and I fail to see how a folded and stamped, non-precision, snap on part will benefit my accuracy.

I can easily see how the sight covers were intended to not impede the shooter if the rifle must be fired while the cover is on, however.
Chris_B is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2018 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.08306 seconds with 11 queries