January 9, 2017, 09:00 AM | #1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2005
Location: Swamp dweller
Posts: 6,187
|
Florida SB 254
Something for Florida gun owners, AR owners should consider looking into and contacting their local state reps. This is what I found while cruising the states upcoming legislative session,
Quote:
__________________
NRA Life Member, NRA Chief Range Safety Officer, NRA Certified Pistol Instructor,, USPSA & Steel Challange NROI Range Officer, ICORE Range Officer, ,MAG 40 Graduate As you are, I once was, As I am, You will be. |
|
January 9, 2017, 10:27 AM | #2 |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
New York SAFE Act, revisited.
It's a cancer, and it's spreading. |
January 9, 2017, 10:31 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 1, 2014
Posts: 314
|
what constitutes assault weapon,"full auto?"
|
January 9, 2017, 11:23 AM | #4 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2005
Location: Swamp dweller
Posts: 6,187
|
Quote:
Here is the link to the pdf , https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bil...Text/Filed/PDF Quote:
__________________
NRA Life Member, NRA Chief Range Safety Officer, NRA Certified Pistol Instructor,, USPSA & Steel Challange NROI Range Officer, ICORE Range Officer, ,MAG 40 Graduate As you are, I once was, As I am, You will be. |
||
January 9, 2017, 01:47 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 1, 2005
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 1,804
|
Bloomberg and the Demanding Moms from Everytown are drooling over this one, you can take it to the bank.
|
January 9, 2017, 01:57 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
Quote:
These sorts of bills pop up periodically in almost every state. Their sponsorship status will often tell you their relative chances of success. (FWIW this is particularly true in TX where I live, as the legislative process places strong emphasis on committees; hence, the absence of any powerful committee members on the sponsorship list often tells you that the bill will never get a floor vote.)
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak |
|
January 10, 2017, 08:05 AM | #7 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2005
Location: Swamp dweller
Posts: 6,187
|
Another bill that has surfaced,
Quote:
https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2017/0167 Quote:
__________________
NRA Life Member, NRA Chief Range Safety Officer, NRA Certified Pistol Instructor,, USPSA & Steel Challange NROI Range Officer, ICORE Range Officer, ,MAG 40 Graduate As you are, I once was, As I am, You will be. |
||
January 10, 2017, 10:17 AM | #8 | ||
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,833
|
Well, that is one of the most comprehensive wish lists I have seen in a long time.
I note a few additions to the usual list, this one actually includes real assault rifles (select fire), which have been regulated under Federal law since 1934 (before actual assault rifles existed, but covered because the select fire capacity makes them machineguns). Semi auto handguns over 50oz empty, say goodbye to the Desert Eagle! Goodbye to any pistol with a threaded barrel Defines high capacity magazine as more than 7 (seven) rounds!!! (goodbye to ALL 9mm mags, all 8rnd 1911A1 mags, etc (unless permanently blocked to 7rnds). In one way or another the list covers about every semi auto firearm I can think of, and this alone Quote:
also no thumbhole stocks, FIXED magazines holding more than 5 (FIVE) rounds (shotgun). Quote:
After they take the semis, this will be the (by then, long established) law that lets them take our revolvers too, when they get around to it. Oh, and that old M16 pistolgrip that has been floating around in your junk drawer for decades? Under this law, possession of it (Without even have a gun it fits on) would be a FELONY!!!! (2 years min) and, OF COURSE, the POLICE and other government agencies are exempted... (but only in the course of their official duties, you understand....) I wonder if any of the sponsors have been appraised of the cost to the state that turning a few MILLION of their citizens into felons overnight would be???
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
||
January 10, 2017, 11:30 AM | #9 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
Quote:
Look at the history of the federal AWB. It expired in 2004 but several states had cloned the language and retained it in state law. As I posted a few days ago, I know people in Connecticut who owned "post-ban" configuration AR-15s. These were perfectly legal under both federal and Connecticut law. They were configured such that they didn't have enough "evil" features to be classified as "assault weapons." And then Sandy Hook happened, and Connecticut revised its assault weapon definition. Instead of allowing two evil features (typically a pistol grip and a removable magazine) they changed it to allowing only ONE "evil" feature. So all those previously-legal, non-assault AR-15s became "assault weapons" with the stroke of the governor's pen, and they had to either register them with the state police or dispose of them out of state. The Florida definition mirrors the new definition used in Connecticut (and, I think, in the NY SAFE Act). Under this new definition, anything with a detachable magazine and even ONE other "evil" feature (usually the pistol grip) becomes an "assault weapon." |
|
January 10, 2017, 12:26 PM | #10 | |||||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2005
Location: Swamp dweller
Posts: 6,187
|
Quote:
Quote:
I looked into the 2 members of our legislature that are involved with both bills I posted about. Both are members of the Democratic party, one is from Orange County ( Pulse Night Club) Senator Linda Stewart Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
NRA Life Member, NRA Chief Range Safety Officer, NRA Certified Pistol Instructor,, USPSA & Steel Challange NROI Range Officer, ICORE Range Officer, ,MAG 40 Graduate As you are, I once was, As I am, You will be. |
|||||
January 10, 2017, 03:53 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 15, 2013
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,416
|
SB 254: Gun Safety.....
So, where's the safety part of this proposed bill? |
January 10, 2017, 04:11 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2015
Location: ga
Posts: 321
|
Its safety for them from us(ppl)
|
January 10, 2017, 05:49 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 30, 2006
Posts: 1,433
|
I had a grandfather named Stewart who was a farmer and kept his guns in a wooden cabinet next to the piano my grandmother used to give piano lessons to children. Fortunately they don't have to witness this kind of stuff.
__________________
Vietnam Veteran ('69-'70) NRA Life Member RMEF Life Member |
January 11, 2017, 08:18 AM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2005
Location: Swamp dweller
Posts: 6,187
|
Quote:
__________________
NRA Life Member, NRA Chief Range Safety Officer, NRA Certified Pistol Instructor,, USPSA & Steel Challange NROI Range Officer, ICORE Range Officer, ,MAG 40 Graduate As you are, I once was, As I am, You will be. |
|
January 11, 2017, 10:07 AM | #15 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
Quote:
|
|
January 11, 2017, 12:19 PM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 1, 2005
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 1,804
|
Quote:
|
|
January 11, 2017, 01:09 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 26, 2014
Posts: 102
|
A bill like this has very little chance of success in the current FL legislature.
Other efforts with high likely hood of passing FL legislature are increasing carry options and removing many restricted areas, such as government buildings. I heard the Governor wants to allow open carry, carry in schools and government buildings, and a few other tweaks to FL 790. In other news, Tallahassee city is being sued because of the preemption clause in FL 790. Florida law prohibits counties, towns, and other municipalities from regulating firearms. The penalty for trying to regulate includes removal from office and either a fine or jail. Tallahassee has an old law (circa 1950s) that prohibits firing a firearm in a public park. Two gun rights groups sued them to remove the law. Other similar law suits have been successful, and there is no reason to believe the Mayor will win this one. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
January 27, 2017, 09:05 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2005
Location: Swamp dweller
Posts: 6,187
|
Florida CS/SB 128 Self Defense Immunity
They are making progress with this bill which moves the burden of proof for a self defense claim from the individual to the state.
The link to the bill, http://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2017/0128 This is the link to the Bill analysis from the Judiciary Post meeting, http://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill...17s0128.ju.PDF
__________________
NRA Life Member, NRA Chief Range Safety Officer, NRA Certified Pistol Instructor,, USPSA & Steel Challange NROI Range Officer, ICORE Range Officer, ,MAG 40 Graduate As you are, I once was, As I am, You will be. |
January 27, 2017, 09:10 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2005
Location: Swamp dweller
Posts: 6,187
|
As of this morning this bill is sitting idle and I am hoping it stays that way
__________________
NRA Life Member, NRA Chief Range Safety Officer, NRA Certified Pistol Instructor,, USPSA & Steel Challange NROI Range Officer, ICORE Range Officer, ,MAG 40 Graduate As you are, I once was, As I am, You will be. |
January 27, 2017, 07:46 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 3, 2017
Posts: 1,583
|
We, in Washington state, have just had a similar bill introduced for the second time. I have already written to my congress critters and the committee members involved that we want to see this and two other bills in the trash as fast as possible.
|
January 27, 2017, 09:12 PM | #21 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
Quote:
|
|
January 28, 2017, 08:27 AM | #22 |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
In practical terms, this bill is dead on arrival. It's been shuffled off to the Judiciary Committee, where it stands no chance.
Chairman Greg Stuebe isn't a typical kinda-sorta-waffles in our favor kind of guy. He's an active supporter of the RKBA who refused to shelve an airport-carry bill following the Fort Lauderdale shooting (a bill he sponsored) and he's been a vocal advocate for open carry. Vice Chair Lizbeth Benacquisto has also been a strong ally, and she has very high ratings from the NRA. On the other hand, the bill's sponsor is Linda Stewart, a first-termer who's probably doing this to establish street cred for a US Senate run in 2018. This has the Feinstein/Bloomberg fingerprints all over it, but it's also so overly broad it has no chance of passing. A few politicians may vote for it as a matter of virtue-signaling, but that's pretty much it.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
January 30, 2017, 11:59 AM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 23, 2005
Location: US
Posts: 3,657
|
Quote:
Still informative to post these here though. It helps inform us as to who is who in our government, and remind us that many would love to regulate us to the point where a single shot rifle or shotgun would be all that we could own. Then they would plot to take those away. |
|
January 30, 2017, 01:13 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
IMHO Tom Servo's reference to virtue signaling is very germane here.
When this is the actual goal, it's often preferable to propose something so extreme or unworkable that it has zero chance of passage; in fact, it's often beneficial for the bill to be so over-the-top that it's quashed in committee without ever being debated publicly. This shields the originator from negative consequences, yet she can allege that her nefarious opponents conspired to bury her so-called "reasonable" attempt to address the issue. Most partisans will never bother to examine the underlying facts behind this claim. This game has probably been around almost as long as the parliamentary-style legislative process.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak Last edited by carguychris; January 30, 2017 at 01:18 PM. |
January 30, 2017, 09:23 PM | #25 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Colion Noir put it best:
Quote:
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
|
|