The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old November 18, 2016, 08:21 PM   #1
Shadow72
Member
 
Join Date: October 27, 2015
Location: Tejas Republic
Posts: 70
Houston's Loss is Austin's Gain

Houston Texas has a new police chief, Art Acevedo, formerly Austin, Texas police chief. Chief Acevedo has, in the past, spoken out against conceled carry, open carry and campus carry laws when the Texas Legs was in session. I assume that Chief Acevedo will continue with his anti-gun policy along with Houston's Sanctuary City policy. I do not recall Houston previously having a openly anti gun police chief, but I could be wrong. What I do think will be interesting is if the Federal Government, with the new administration coming in 2017, decides to enforce federal law against Sanctuary Cities. Could be interesting, given that Houston has a cash flow problem from it's previous Progressive administration.
Shadow72 is offline  
Old November 18, 2016, 09:53 PM   #2
Longhorn1986
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 12, 2016
Location: Fort Bend County, Texas
Posts: 173
And things like this are why I live 35 miles out of Houston and Harris County. Houston is my hometown, but the less I see of it anymore, the better I like it.
Longhorn1986 is offline  
Old November 21, 2016, 09:26 AM   #3
csmsss
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 3,078
Acevedo is one of the most thoroughly politicized and contemptible police chiefs this country is cursed with, and is, quite frankly, an embarassment to our great state.
csmsss is offline  
Old November 21, 2016, 12:00 PM   #4
Glenn E. Meyer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
While I agree with the sentiment, we need to discuss the actual impact he may or may not have on firearms issues in Houston. Or whether the climate in Austin would change.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens
Glenn E. Meyer is offline  
Old November 23, 2016, 01:03 AM   #5
jdc1244
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 532
Quote:
I assume that Chief Acevedo will continue with his anti-gun policy along with Houston's Sanctuary City policy.
Which will have no bearing whatsoever concerning gun owners in Houston.

Acevedo is subject to state laws, the state constitution, and the Federal
Constitution, his opinions regarding current Second Amendment jurisprudence are subjective and irrelevant.

And if Acevedo acts to regulate firearms contrary to that jurisprudence, those adversely affected are at liberty to seek relief in state or Federal court.

Last, whether Huston elects to use the city’s resourced to enforce Federal immigration laws or not is likely not up to Acevedo alone.
jdc1244 is offline  
Old November 23, 2016, 06:50 AM   #6
Texas45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2016
Posts: 223
I know all the officers I know from Austin including my BIL are glad to see this guy go.
Not surprised he went to Houston he should fit right in.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Texas45 is offline  
Old November 23, 2016, 10:15 AM   #7
TXAZ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Location: McMurdo Sound Texas
Posts: 4,322
I'll strongly disagree with jdc1244.

I lived in Austin and worked for the state police during 'the Artist's' rein. He is quite good at telling enough of the truth to get many to believe he's an honorable guy and making progress.

But to your question, police chiefs are usually given pretty broad latitude, however your statement:

"Acevedo is subject to state laws, the state constitution, and the Federal
Constitution, his opinions regarding current Second Amendment jurisprudence are subjective and irrelevant"


is very wrong.


Chief Acevedo showed he plays fast and loose with people and policies he does not agree with. Even though Austin has "police watchers", he became adept at minimizing their impacts and influence. But the biggest con, I'll call it outright fraud and abuse of all Austin-ites, was his dealing with Austin's unacceptable 911 call for service times.

How did he "improve" the times? I'm glad you asked such a relevant question. It was very easy, he changed the definition of time. By making small changes in when the clock started and stopped, he was able to trim the service times significantly. NO real change in reality, and only a few people knew the system well enough to call him on it, but he prevailed claiming those naysayers didn't know what they were talking about and didn't understand how (his) police operate. (But they did.)

Austin's city council supported him because of his stand on sanctuary status, guns and several other policies dear to those on the far left.

In summary, Houston loss will be Austin's gain, as the policies that change / become enforced in Austin will be blamed on the new President's policies that Acevado and others who don't believe in the uniform enforcement of existing laws hate.
__________________

Cave illos in guns et backhoes
TXAZ is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.03735 seconds with 10 queries