|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 19, 2010, 09:16 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Naples, Fl
Posts: 5,440
|
I am going to take a chance....
....posting a question about black powder revolvers in this essentially cartridge domain.
Experts, I am requesting your advice. I have a Leech and Rigdon clone which I am working on. The barrel to cylinder gap was way wide at about .008 to .009. Seating the wedge tightly did little to correct the problem. I turned the barrel on the arbor and found that there was plenty of room for the barrel to move closer to the cylinder. So I took the milling machine to the barrel lug as shown below. I felt like the only alternative was to go to work on the frame itself. As the frame is tapered, I knew it would be very difficult holding it in place for the miling operation. Also, I can get a barrel cheap. That frame is hard to come by at any price approaching a completely new pistol. This operation closed the gap down to about .004 - .005 which I am very pleased with. Is there another way to do this operation?
__________________
Seek truth. Relax. Take a breath. |
October 19, 2010, 01:10 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
|
The barrel-cylinder gap is generous on BP pistols so that they will continue to operate as they get fouled. .008" does not seem excessive to me. .005" seems a bit close to reliably rotate after firing several rounds, but only testing it will show for sure.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs. But what do I know? Summit Arms Services |
October 19, 2010, 04:05 PM | #3 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,022
|
My replica Remington 1858 does that. About 2 or 3 cylinder loadings and it starts to stiffen up. I've never tried using a BP substitute to see if that improved it any? I guess I like the smell of BP too much.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle Last edited by Unclenick; October 20, 2010 at 04:33 PM. Reason: typo fix |
October 19, 2010, 06:08 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Naples, Fl
Posts: 5,440
|
Scorch and Unc,
Thanks for the wink back. I load out of the pistol so I can keep the fouling from gumming up the works too much. How about some suggestions on alternative ways to lessen the gap? In your opinion, am I doing it right?
__________________
Seek truth. Relax. Take a breath. |
October 19, 2010, 07:28 PM | #5 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
No, you did it the only way you could, but of course you now may have to get or make a new wedge to keep the barrel in the right position. You might have had to drill the holes for the pins deeper, but that seems to have worked OK.
I will join those who saw nothing wrong with the original gap; I consider .007" about ideal in a modern revolver but the factories usually consider .010" to be within spec. Another issue, though. In discussing a tight b/c gap in revolvers (old or new), most people focus on fouling. But another problem is heat. After firing rapidly, a cylinder heats up and expands lengthwise. If the b/c gap is too tight, the gun will bind up until the cylinder cools down. And yes, even a fast six shots from a c&b revolver can do that if the gap is too tight. Jim |
October 19, 2010, 07:40 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Naples, Fl
Posts: 5,440
|
Jim,
All good info.
Wedge and pins are okay. I will watch for the pistol tightening up.
__________________
Seek truth. Relax. Take a breath. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|