|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 3, 2012, 08:08 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 4, 2006
Location: Back in glorious Nebraska
Posts: 606
|
45acp and 45acp +p brass (9mm differences as well)
I have read conflicting stories on this. Originally I thought the reason for +p brass was for a hotter load thicker webbing to withstand the added pressures. Then I see where some are saying due to the thicker webbing the volume of powder was decreased. In another account I seen a pic of the two cases cut in half length ways and the +p had less material in the head so slightly more powder could be used so can someone put some clarification on the differences and separate fact from fiction.
__________________
"In the beginning of a change, the patriot is a scarce man and brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot." Last edited by TNT; June 4, 2012 at 12:06 PM. |
June 3, 2012, 08:58 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 1999
Location: home on the range; Vermont (Caspian country)
Posts: 14,324
|
Certain brands offer "+P" cases that differ only in headstamp, while some brands' cases actually differ.
Thicker / thinner / alloying / heat treatment / ???..... There is no cookie-cutter answer.
__________________
. "all my ammo is mostly retired factory ammo" |
June 4, 2012, 12:07 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 4, 2006
Location: Back in glorious Nebraska
Posts: 606
|
so if that is the case then why even have different brass if the change is only cosmetic?
__________________
"In the beginning of a change, the patriot is a scarce man and brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot." |
June 4, 2012, 12:24 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 4,341
|
Quote:
To differentiate from standard and +P loads. Some guns are not made to shoot +P ammo, so knowing the difference can be important. |
|
June 4, 2012, 12:28 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 6, 1999
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 1,021
|
You are looking at this from the position of a reloader. Back when it was still factory ammo the +P meant that it was loaded to +P pressures. That way when Joe buys a box of 45acp +P ammo, loads up his magazines, throws away the box, dies and his son, Joe Jr., inherits the gun and the ammo he knows that those are +P rounds.
But yeah, after the ammo is shot the headstamp means decidedly less.
__________________
New gun, same ol' shot. |
June 4, 2012, 12:56 PM | #6 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 1,730
|
Starline Brass-Only
The Starline website- http://www.starlinebrass.com/ -
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by 243winxb; June 4, 2012 at 01:03 PM. |
|||
June 4, 2012, 02:28 PM | #7 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,022
|
As I just explained in a parallel thread, SAAMI only specs the exterior dimensions of the case and finished cartridge. What a manufacturer finds he needs to do to the inside ti make the brass handle pressure is up to him. Some make it all the same, some don't. Also you can harden brass and increase its tensile strength by working it more, so the number of forming steps can affect it. Hatcher mentions once having headstamp markings struck extra deep to increase head hardness to get cases that would withstand burst pressures so he could determine what those actually were.
The conundrum for most hand loaders is will my pet powder charge be affected by changing from a standard to a +P case. That depends on the volume inside the case under the bullet. In most instances the domestic brands are close enough in exterior dimensions that you can determine this just by weight difference. If a set of +P cases with the same brand headstamp are heavier than the standard cases you have, then they have less capacity and you should back your load down.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
June 4, 2012, 07:14 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 4, 2006
Location: Back in glorious Nebraska
Posts: 606
|
Thanks Nick I was hoping someone would define the difference
__________________
"In the beginning of a change, the patriot is a scarce man and brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot." |
June 4, 2012, 10:42 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
Posts: 4,678
|
Starline +P 45acp brass [high pressure] has thicker walls than 45 Super [higher pressure] or 460 Rowland [highest pressure].
The man at Starline says that is because the +P brass is capable of working in poor case support barrels, where good case support is expected in 45 Super and 460 Rowland. 9mm, 9mm+P, and 9mm +P+ all look the same to me in cross section. 357 mag has a thicker web than 38 special, but that thicker web is just taking up space. I have never heard of anyone who could get a 38 special case web to fail.
__________________
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books." "Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. If you bought the book, and believe it all, it may FEEL like an ad hominem attack, but you might strive to accept other points of view may exist. Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought? |
June 5, 2012, 07:13 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 1999
Location: home on the range; Vermont (Caspian country)
Posts: 14,324
|
My Remington 9x19 cases differ from my Remington 9x19 +P+ cases.
__________________
. "all my ammo is mostly retired factory ammo" |
June 5, 2012, 09:49 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 13, 2002
Location: Red River Valley of the North
Posts: 203
|
On the 45ACP case the "normal" web thickness is 0.175" for 45 ACP, 0.182" for 45 ACP+P and 0.198 for 45ACP Super. That is a significant difference in strength IMHO. Unless you have a ramped barrel in your 1911, I'd recommend the +P and/or Super cases when you decide you want to "experiment" with over the top loads along with the use of heavier springs.
|
June 7, 2012, 10:10 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
Posts: 4,678
|
Quote:
I don't have any great source data, just a can full of cross sectioned brass. It would be better if we made drawing of our cross sectioned brass and quantified it where it counts. It would be best if manufacturers gave source data on the range of internal dimensions and brass hardness or tensile yield stress.
__________________
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books." "Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. If you bought the book, and believe it all, it may FEEL like an ad hominem attack, but you might strive to accept other points of view may exist. Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought? |
|
June 8, 2012, 02:52 PM | #13 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,022
|
I agree. SAAMI leaves all those interior details up to the manufacturer, but the military does not. Their spec drawings show a sectioned case profile with hardness points taken at a number of locations. The military also specifies internal head thickness from the breech and case wall dimensions at specific points for both brass and steel cases (separate drawings). It's a much more thorough specification and is the reason military brass is often more durable in self-loaders.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
June 8, 2012, 08:29 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
Posts: 4,678
|
Good idea
__________________
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books." "Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. If you bought the book, and believe it all, it may FEEL like an ad hominem attack, but you might strive to accept other points of view may exist. Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|