The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old February 5, 2017, 04:40 PM   #1
YankeeIronSights
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 261
What does the "L" in Beretta 92FS Compact L stands for?

I recently purchased a Beretta 92FS Compact "L" pistol and would like to know what does the "L" stands for?

I emailed this question to Beretta USA but have not received an answer yet.

Can anyone please shed some light towards this trivia question?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
YankeeIronSights is offline  
Old February 5, 2017, 04:49 PM   #2
nhyrum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 9, 2016
Posts: 588
http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_5_15/150057_.html

Seems to basically differentiate between the compact type m. L is a double stack, M is a single stack

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
nhyrum is offline  
Old February 5, 2017, 04:58 PM   #3
YankeeIronSights
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 261
Thanks for the prompt response.

L = Double Stack makes a lot of sense. Someone told me it may mean "light". Another person said it means "lanyard".


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
YankeeIronSights is offline  
Old February 6, 2017, 09:52 AM   #4
carguychris
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by nhyrum
L is a double stack, M is a single stack
This is incorrect. The single-stack pistols are designated Compact L Type M, and are normally marked as such. Generally, the slide will be marked COMPACT L, and there will be a TYPE-M- marking (with the dashes) on the frame above the trigger guard. IOW Beretta considers both to be a Compact L, and adds Type M to denote a single-stack frame.

I don't know what the "L" actually stands for, although I often joke that it stands for "Large," as the pistol remains larger and/or heavier than many pistols competitors classify as full-size.

[EDIT TO ADD] Beretta didn't always apply the "L" to the slide legend on the 92SB Compact, Type M or not, although AFAIK the model was still officially considered to be a Compact L. OTOH I've never seen a 92F or 92FS Compact L that wasn't marked as such. Beretta has also manufactured the 92 Centurion with a Type M frame. You can find a Beretta Forum FAQ chart of 92 Compact variants at THIS LINK.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak

Last edited by carguychris; February 6, 2017 at 10:04 AM.
carguychris is offline  
Old February 6, 2017, 01:24 PM   #5
T. O'Heir
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
I'd put money it doesn't 'stand' for anything and is just a designator. Like the F, D, G, DS and CB.
"...The single-stack pistols are designated Compact L Type M..." Nope. There's an L and an M.
L = Shorter barrel, slide and a more compact frame with a 13-round magazine capacity.
M = Similar to the Compact L, but has a slimmer grip that accepts only a single stacked 8-round magazine.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count!
T. O'Heir is offline  
Old February 6, 2017, 02:20 PM   #6
carguychris
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by T. O'Heir
"...The single-stack pistols are designated Compact L Type M..." Nope. There's an L and an M.
L = Shorter barrel, slide and a more compact frame with a 13-round magazine capacity.
M = Similar to the Compact L, but has a slimmer grip that accepts only a single stacked 8-round magazine.
I stand by my assertion that the single-stack 8rd Beretta 92 can be both an L and an M.

This is borne out by a simple Google search for "Beretta 92 Type M." Look closely at the starboard-side slide legends. A typical example can be seen at THIS m4carbine.net link; "MOD. 92FS COMPACT L CAL. 9mm Parabellum PATENTED" slide legend, "TYPE-M-" on frame.

Many Beretta fans omit the "L" for brevity when discussing the Type M, but it's usually still found in its usual spot in the slide legend, unless the pistol in question is a 92SB or Centurion.

Lastly, just out of curiosity, are there many Type M's in Canada? This would make sense given the nationwide 10rd limit. They're quite uncommon stateside.

[EDIT TO ADD]
Quote:
Originally Posted by T. O'Heir
I'd put money it doesn't 'stand' for anything and is just a designator. Like the F, D, G, DS and CB.
No dispute there.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak

Last edited by carguychris; February 6, 2017 at 02:25 PM. Reason: stuff added
carguychris is offline  
Old September 23, 2018, 12:35 PM   #7
Chicken-n-Waffles
Junior Member
 
Join Date: September 23, 2018
Posts: 4
Beretta's alphabet soup

I’m resurrecting an old thread here, I know, but since it’s one of the first that comes up on Google related to this topic, I thought it might be forgiven.

The “L” and “M” both refer to design characteristics of the 92 series, but they refer to different aspects.

“L” = Long (or, if you want to be really correct and use the original Italian, “Lungo”) for “long slide travel”. The shorter, lighter slides on the Compact and Centurion models require longer slide travel to function optimally and to avoid battering the frames, so the frames have slightly different internal dimensions, particularly the rail lengths. All 92 series Compacts, including both the double-stack and single-stack, are “L”, though this part of the description is often dropped both in casual usage and on some models markings. Centurions are also technically ”L” too, since their slides are apparently the same except for the name, though they generally aren’t marked as “L”. Confusingly, Beretta did make a very small number of Compact L pistols (possibly only single-stack Type M, but I haven’t been able to confirm this) using Centurion slides, so they are marked as Centurions despite having the shorter grip length of the Compact.

Type M = Type Monofilare (Italian for single-file/single-column). The Compacts with single-stack magazines are thus Type M. This is also how we get the somewhat rare “Centurion Type M”, a single-stack “Centurion” that seems to really be just a Compact L Type M with a Centurion-marked slide. The thinking is that Beretta had the Centurion in current production at the time, while the Type M was officially out of production, so they just used Centurion slides on warehoused Type M frames to fill some contract orders. “So you want the single-stack compact? Sorry, we don’t...uhhh...wait...oh, yeah, sure, we can do that."

Side Note: The entire Compact L Type M field is wildly complicated and non-conformist. For being relatively scarce pistols, they were made in a dizzying range of variations, usually in really small numbers and often uncataloged. This was especially true in the 1990s. Centurion-marked slides, SB type frames with FS type slides, guns dated years after production officially ceased, etc., etc. One theory is that since many (most?) of the later Type Ms were made for different governmental and police agency contracts around the world, small batches of semi-custom configurations became the usual thing.

All of the letter designations that Beretta uses reference the description of some design spec, but they are very confusing in the way they relate them to the pistols. For example (some originally refer to Italian words with similar spellings, but some refer directly to English):

92S is ""Slide-mounted safety" (as opposed to the original frame-mounted safety)
92SB is "Slide-mounted safety, firing pin Block"
92F is "Federal US test submission"
92FS is "Federal US test model, Slide retention device" (the oversized hammer pin that catches the slide if it separates)
92G is "Gendarmerie Nationale", the French national police who first asked Beretta for a decocker-only model.
92D is "Double action only"
92DS is "Double action only, with Safety"
92CB is "Competition model, barrel Bushing"

And that's without getting into the really weird stuff!

Last edited by Chicken-n-Waffles; September 23, 2018 at 12:49 PM.
Chicken-n-Waffles is offline  
Old September 24, 2018, 05:30 AM   #8
Spats McGee
Staff
 
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicken-n-Waffles View Post
I’m resurrecting an old thread here, I know, but since it’s one of the first that comes up on Google related to this topic, I thought it might be forgiven. . . . .
Welcome to TFL, Chicken-n-Waffles! That's quite the entrance you've made there.
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some.
Spats McGee is offline  
Old September 24, 2018, 06:56 AM   #9
fourbore
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 22, 2015
Location: new england
Posts: 1,159
Quote:
92CB is "Competition model, barrel Bushing"
Are these still made?
fourbore is offline  
Old September 24, 2018, 10:07 AM   #10
Chicken-n-Waffles
Junior Member
 
Join Date: September 23, 2018
Posts: 4
Thanks for the welcome! I've been a longtime reader, but never posted before. This was the first time some of my collection of useless knowledge might not be quite so useless.
Chicken-n-Waffles is offline  
Old September 24, 2018, 10:20 AM   #11
Mal H
Staff
 
Join Date: March 20, 1999
Location: Somewhere in the woods of Northern Virginia
Posts: 16,947
This kind of thread resurrection we don't mind. Thanks for the good info.
Mal H is offline  
Old September 24, 2018, 10:36 AM   #12
Chicken-n-Waffles
Junior Member
 
Join Date: September 23, 2018
Posts: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by fourbore View Post
Are these still made?
Unfortunately, no. They were only made in a short run around 1992-1993. There were complaints that the standard profile slide didn't hold up to high-volume shooting in training and competition, and that the overall weight was too light for a competition gun. Beretta moved to the Brigadier profile slide the next year with the 92 Stock Competition and a year or two later with the 92 Combat (which was actually intended to be a competition pistol...Beretta with their curious naming again). The 92 Combat is out of production since the early 2000s, and the 92 Stock is not actively imported into the US (it's also not always cataloged in Europe, but they seem to turn up sometimes anyway).
Chicken-n-Waffles is offline  
Old September 24, 2018, 03:01 PM   #13
lechiffre
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 3, 2008
Location: phoenix,az
Posts: 513
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicken-n-Waffles View Post

“L” = Long (or, if you want to be really correct and use the original Italian, “Lungo”) for “long slide travel”.
If "L" stands for Lungo (Long) slide travel, then what about the Cougar "L"? The Cougar has the same slide length for all three sizes. Might "L" stand for Leggero (Light), as in lightweight ?
__________________
if God hadn't meant us to shoot he wouldn't have given us trigger fingers

do the interns get glocks ?
lechiffre is offline  
Old September 25, 2018, 11:34 AM   #14
Chicken-n-Waffles
Junior Member
 
Join Date: September 23, 2018
Posts: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by lechiffre View Post
If "L" stands for Lungo (Long) slide travel, then what about the Cougar "L"? The Cougar has the same slide length for all three sizes. Might "L" stand for Leggero (Light), as in lightweight ?
That's a good point, and I would not be at all surprised if the "L" in the 8000 series refers to "Leggero", though the 8000s are really out of my area of understanding. That said, my communication with them years ago indicated that at least the original reference on the 92 Compact was to "Lungo/Long". Beretta is pretty inconsistent in their nomenclature (sometimes even within the same series), so almost anything is possible with them. It may very well have been "Lungo" when the 92 Compact L was being developed, and then the letter was "recycled" with the newer 8000 pistols.

Update: I quickly checked with a source in Italy, and sure enough, "L" in the 8000 series does indeed refer to "Leggera"! The official line is that it was done to improve weight savings over the original 8000..the word inside the industry is that it was done to deal with reliability problems, especially with lighter loads. So it does look like we've got two different "L"s in play.

Last edited by Chicken-n-Waffles; September 25, 2018 at 12:05 PM.
Chicken-n-Waffles is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07685 seconds with 8 queries