The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Bolt, Lever, and Pump Action

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old November 20, 2015, 09:08 PM   #1
kcub
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 24, 2010
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,318
44-40 contradictions

One of the original attributes was to have ammo commonality between revolver and rifle.

In Cartridges of the World they mention a factory peppier load "for rifles only".

Today most ammo is cowgirl @ 725 fps. And then there is Winchester jsp at 1190 fps. Is it safe in revolvers? Also there is Magtech blue box @ 1180 with a lead flatnose bullet. Safe in revolvers? Will it lead a barrel?

At what barrel length are these velocities measured?
kcub is offline  
Old November 20, 2015, 10:15 PM   #2
Art Eatman
Staff in Memoriam
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
The .44-40 is factory loaded to be safe in early SAA Colts and (I guess) 1873 Winchesters. So, slow.

Unless the lead is really soft, 1,180 shouldn't cause a leading problem. I have no clue as to the safety. Sounds a bit too hot, just offhand guessing. Probably safe in a Model 92 or modern replica.
Art Eatman is offline  
Old November 21, 2015, 12:00 AM   #3
Dufus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2014
Posts: 1,965
From what I have seen is that those velocities would be rifle.

The 44-40 is limited to approximately 13,000 psi.

The original loading with 40 gr black powder shows about 1200 fps from a 24" barrel.

Whether they are safe in a handgun depends solely on the handgun IMO.

If Colt chambered it in their SAA, then all factory loads would be safe as the pressures are about the same as the 45 Colt. Not to be confused with the warmer loads as they are called for the Ruger only which bumps up to 30,000 psi
Dufus is offline  
Old November 21, 2015, 12:22 AM   #4
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,486
I am pretty sure the "cowboy" stuff listed at 725 fps was shot in a pistol.
The "standard" load at 1190 fps is from a rifle barrel.

Either is meant to be safe in a revolver or an 1873 Winchester, with all appropriate Internet Timidity about the black powder guns you might have laying around... that Grandpa shot smokeless in every time he could afford it.

I don't think there are any of the high velocity, high speed, high power loads meant for 1892 Winchester (and likely 1894 Marlin) being made any more.
Jim Watson is offline  
Old November 21, 2015, 11:46 AM   #5
kcub
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 24, 2010
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,318
The blue Magtech box has a footnote saying the 1180 fps was taken from a 24" barrel.
kcub is offline  
Old November 21, 2015, 06:12 PM   #6
mehavey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 17, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,869
"We first see these new improved performance cartridges in Winchester’s Catalog #70 dated March, 1903. Cartridges were head stamped .44 W.C.F. W.H.V. ’M92. Velocity with a 200 gr. metal patched bullet was catalogued at 1,500 f.p.s. in a 24” barrel. Instructions in Winchester’s catalogue and on the cartridge boxes indicated they were not for use in ’73 Winchesters or handguns. Velocity was increased to 1,570 f.p.s. in 1910."
http://www.leverguns.com/articles/44wcf.htm

Botton Line:Times change...quarter century after first appearance as 'dual-use'.
mehavey is offline  
Old November 21, 2015, 10:32 PM   #7
kcub
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 24, 2010
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,318
The reason I keep mentioning MagTech blue box is because there is also a MagTech white box at the really low cowboy velocity. There is also low velocity Winchester cowboy 44-40, so we have 2 different loads or the same double standard times 2 different ammo companies.
kcub is offline  
Old November 21, 2015, 11:07 PM   #8
Kosh75287
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 15, 2007
Posts: 820
I don't have my Cartridges of the World book near me, so I'm working from memory, here:

If memory serves, the 44-40, loaded with 40 grains black powder and 205 (200?)gr. bullet did as was said, about 1180 f/s from a 24" barrel (a slight improvement on the .44 Henry rimfire, in a reloadable case). From a revolver barrel, the load lost @ 25% + 5% of that velocity, depending on the revolver's barrel length.

A "modern" loading, consisting of a 200gr. JSP with smokeless powder, gave a M.V. of 1310 f/s from a 24" barrel. It seems they cautioned against using them in made before the advent of smokeless powder, though they were said to be okay in the lever rifles. I would have expected the reverse, given the flimsy toggle on the 1873 Winchester, and the generally solid construction of most single-action .44-40s. It could be that the jacketed factory loads were only intended for use in M1892 Winchesters.
__________________
GOD BLESS JEFF COOPER, whose instructions, consultations, and publications have probably saved more lives than can ever be reliably calculated. DVC, sir.

انجلو. المسلحة. جاهزة. Carpe SCOTCH!
Kosh75287 is offline  
Old November 22, 2015, 03:28 PM   #9
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,486
In 1939 the standard .44-40 load was a 200 gr bullet (lead, full jacketed (WHY?), or softpoint) at 1300 fps.

In 1974 Ken Waters was getting 1245 fps with factory loads and 1300 in some handloads he considered safe in 1873s etc.

The 1939 catalog also lists hotter stuff, footnoted in the price list as "Higher power cartridges than usual."
Winchester 1892 W.H.V. with a 200 at 1565
Peters High Velocity with a 200 at 1600
Remington Hi Speed with a 160 at 2000

I would not want to shoot those in an 1873 or an old wrought iron Frontier Six Shooter.


Peters claimed 918 fps for their standard load in a pistol but that must have been in a solid test barrel because Ken Waters only got 798 in a real New Service, a 7.5" at that.


I think the present crop of "Cowboy Loads" is meant more to relieve the tenderfeet of recoil than to protect old guns, which they warn against using with anything.
Jim Watson is offline  
Old November 22, 2015, 06:20 PM   #10
Mike Irwin
Staff
 
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,374
After the Winchester Model 1892 was introduced, several ammunition companies started loading higher pressure, higher velocity rounds specifically for that rifle.

Rounds included the .44-40, possibly the .38-40, and the .32-20.

Boxes were marked that the ammo was NOT to be used in either revolvers or in Winchester 1873 rifles.

Then, as now, people are generally too stupid to read, pay attention, etc., and people blew up their revolvers and blew the side plates off their Model 1873s.

These days people would immediately sue, back then they generally kept their mouths shut out of embarrassment.

The higher pressure rounds were loaded for a number of years, but I don't think they made it back into production after World War II.

Companies also loaded higher pressure, higher velocity rounds for the .45-70, intended for use in the Model 1886 Winchester.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza

Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower.
Mike Irwin is offline  
Old November 22, 2015, 06:42 PM   #11
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,486
There were HV, HS, and WHV .38-40s.

Also .32-20 and some of them stayed in production until 1960 or so.
So be careful what you shoot old stock .32-20 80 gr JSP in.
Jim Watson is offline  
Old November 26, 2015, 11:11 PM   #12
Malamute
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 6, 2004
Location: Rocky Mts
Posts: 859
The factory jacketed soft point loads that showed 1250-1300 fps in rifles showed 975 fps from a 7 1/2" barreled pistol in the older ballistics charts from WWII through the 70's at least. That was considered safe in all rifles and pistols.
__________________
"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat." -Theodore Roosevelt-
Malamute is offline  
Old November 27, 2015, 06:12 PM   #13
Driftwood Johnson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2014
Location: Land of the Pilgrims
Posts: 2,032
Howdy

For what it's worth, I bought this Marlin Model 1894, manufactured in 1895, back around 1975.






The only 44-40 ammo the store had on hand was this box. There are still a couple of rounds in the box. This stuff did not hurt the old Marlin.







Regarding the strength of a toggle link rifle (Henry, Winchester Model 1866, Winchester Model 1873), don't be fooled by what you read on the internet.

Yes, the toggle link lock up is not strong compared to a Model 1892 Winchester, , but if the rifle is in good condition and the links line up properly, an old toggle link rifle is much stronger than the old iron frame Colts. It gets down to how much metal is surrounding the chamber. The thickness of the barrel of an old Winchester results in a lot of metal surrounding the cartridge, while the chamber walls of a revolver are very thin. Couple that with how thin the metal is at the cylinder locking latch, and that is why the original 40 grain 45 Colt load was reduced to 30 grains of powder by the Army. Some of the early Colts with their malleable iron cylinders were blowing up with the 40 grain load.

That old Marlin of mine is a very strong design, almost as strong as a Model 1892 Winchester.
Driftwood Johnson is offline  
Old November 27, 2015, 06:36 PM   #14
Art Eatman
Staff in Memoriam
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
My Frontier Colt SAA, 1903/Second generation, does just fine with today's standard factory load.
Art Eatman is offline  
Old November 27, 2015, 10:00 PM   #15
Driftwood Johnson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2014
Location: Land of the Pilgrims
Posts: 2,032
Quote:
My Frontier Colt SAA, 1903/Second generation, does just fine with today's standard factory load.
Howdy Again

If it was made in 1903 it is a First Gen, not a Second Gen.

First Gen production ran from 1873 right up to 1940.

Second Gen production started in 1956, ran to about 1975 IIRC.
Driftwood Johnson is offline  
Old November 27, 2015, 10:20 PM   #16
B.L.E.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2008
Location: Somewhere on the Southern shore of Lake Travis, TX
Posts: 2,603
Quote:
I am pretty sure the "cowboy" stuff listed at 725 fps was shot in a pistol.
My experience with chronographing loads like that is that a rifle barrel only adds about 100 fps or so to the pistol velocity, if that much.
The pistol powders appropriate for loads such as this are pretty much expended in a pistol length barrel and the extra barrel length of a rifle pretty much just guides the bullet to the target.
__________________
Hanlon's Razor
"Do not invoke conspiracy as explanation when ignorance and incompetence will suffice, as conspiracy implies intelligence and organization."
B.L.E. is offline  
Old February 22, 2018, 08:57 AM   #17
Savvy_Jack
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 4, 2018
Posts: 220
For what it's worth Buffalo Bore is now offering hunting loads more powerful than Winchester Super-X but remaining below SAAMI max pressures. They call them "Heavy" loads but they are not high pressure loads nor are they heavy grain bullets.

Although Tim sent me written permission to post anything from his site to anyplace I like, I will abide by the forum rules.

They offer two bullets, a 200gr Hard Cast and a 185gr Hollow Point
Here is a brief description of the ballistics of the 200gr HC;

200gr Hard Cast

➤ 1,350 fps -- Winchester model 1892, 20-inch barrel, circa 1916
➤ 1,353 fps -- Uberti model 1873, 19-inch barrel, circa 1997
➤ 1,034 fps -- Ruger Vaquero (large frame), 7.5-inch barrel, circa 2003
➤ 1,036 fps -- Colt New Service, 7.5-inch barrel, circa 1905
➤ 980 fps -- S&W model 544, 5.5-inch barrel, circa 1980’s
➤ ??? fps -- Custom (Brian Pearce made) SAA replica, 5.5-inch barrel, circa 2017
➤ 949 fps -- Ruger converted 357 Mag. flat top (by Jack Huntington), circa 1959, 4.75-inch barrel

Full description can be found on Buffalo Bore's website or on my "non-vender" website
https://www.44winchestercenterfireca...ory-pt-2-by-ed


I also want to add that early high velocity loads from the 1903-1945 era were rated at 22,000psi and not suitable for old weapons or revolvers as so stated on the boxes. Post WWII High Velocity loads such as the one from Remington from about 1960 were neutered down and safe for all rifles and revolvers.

No different that currently manufactured 45-70, 45 Colt, 38, 44 magnum, 44 special High Pressure Loads, ALWAYS read directions and warnings before using.

Last edited by Savvy_Jack; February 22, 2018 at 09:10 AM.
Savvy_Jack is offline  
Old February 22, 2018, 10:13 AM   #18
COSteve
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 6, 2009
Posts: 1,344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Driftwood Johnson View Post
Yes, the toggle link lock up is not strong compared to a Model 1892 Winchester, , but if the rifle is in good condition and the links line up properly, an old toggle link rifle is much stronger than the old iron frame Colts. It gets down to how much metal is surrounding the chamber. The thickness of the barrel of an old Winchester results in a lot of metal surrounding the cartridge, while the chamber walls of a revolver are very thin. Couple that with how thin the metal is at the cylinder locking latch, and that is why the original 40 grain 45 Colt load was reduced to 30 grains of powder by the Army. Some of the early Colts with their malleable iron cylinders were blowing up with the 40 grain load.
While it's true that the chamber contains the case and therefore a strong barrel will keep the barrel from failing, it's also true that the bolt thrust is what puts load on the action and the small pins on the '66 & '73 Winchester design will eventually oval out the holes in the links causing the actions to loosen with the continued use of higher pressure loads than it was designed for, i.e. over 14,000psi.

Before I got my '73 and '66 Ubertis, I talked to Steve of Steve's Guns. He works on a lot of CASS rifles and he's told me that continued use of high pressure loads in those actions will both stretch the frame and loosen the action over time. A stretched frame and/or loose action will eventually lead to a case failure which will spoil one's day. It's his job to fix them and so I figure he knows what he's talking about. I handload and keep my loads under 14,000psi for those 2 rifles but also have 2 Rossi 357mag M92s and I only shoot max pressure loads in them as their actions are fine with them.
COSteve is offline  
Old February 22, 2018, 10:21 AM   #19
Savvy_Jack
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 4, 2018
Posts: 220
A while back folks were talking about the 73' chambered for 44 magnum. I don't have one nor have I kept up with the topic. I never did get the final information on what upgrades were made for the 44 magnum chambering that made it stronger or if those mods could be made to the 44-40.
Savvy_Jack is offline  
Old February 22, 2018, 10:39 AM   #20
zipspyder
Junior member
 
Join Date: June 13, 2017
Posts: 429
I have to agree with everyone else. Keep the loads to cowboy or max std pressure and you will be fine. No reason to use hot loads unless hunting and then only out of the lever. They both go bang and hit the target if you do your part.
zipspyder is offline  
Old February 22, 2018, 12:13 PM   #21
T. O'Heir
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
OP is 3 years old.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count!
T. O'Heir is offline  
Old February 22, 2018, 12:15 PM   #22
Savvy_Jack
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 4, 2018
Posts: 220
Yes it is, I checked the box to continue...anything else?

Last edited by Savvy_Jack; February 23, 2018 at 07:26 AM.
Savvy_Jack is offline  
Old February 23, 2018, 03:59 PM   #23
Driftwood Johnson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2014
Location: Land of the Pilgrims
Posts: 2,032
Quote:
A while back folks were talking about the 73' chambered for 44 magnum. I don't have one nor have I kept up with the topic. I never did get the final information on what upgrades were made for the 44 magnum chambering that made it stronger or if those mods could be made to the 44-40.
I had the chance to examine one of the 44 Mag '73s a couple of years ago. It was on the shelf right next to a '73 chambered for 45 Colt if I recall correctly. As far as I could tell, there was absolutely no difference between the frames of the 44 Mag and the 45 Colt. They both appeared to be the same thickness to me. Which makes the most sense, manufacturing wise. It would cost a lot more to beef up the frame of one chambered for 44 Mag instead of just using the same components as was in a standard one chambered for 44-40 or 45 Colt. Interestingly enough, going to the Uberti website, the suggested retail price for the 44 Mag model is the same as the suggested retail price of the 45 Colt, 44-40, and 357 Mag versions. Which tells me there is no difference in the components, other than the chambering of the barrel. Bear in mind, all these guns are proofed in Italy to European standards, which are slightly higher than SAAMI specs. That means the guns have survived a proof charge of about 1/3 more pressure as the standard maximum pressure for the cartridge in question. However how well the gun will stand up to the continued pounding of 44 Mag loads over time is a completely different question. I remember one time a buddy bought a used Uberti '73 chambered for 357 Mag. He brought it back when he discovered a crack in the frame. No idea why it was cracked, but the suspicion was that the frame gave way after too many full power 357 Mag loads.

Regarding how thin the pins are, when a toggle link gun is properly set up, the thrust of recoil is spread out by the ends of the toggle links against the mortises in the frame, not the pivot pins. Yes, I have chatted with Steve of Steve's guns before, he certainly knows what he is talking about. But historical evidence has shown that with the brass framed guns, the '66 and the Henry, the brass frame is fairly likely to stretch with heavy loads. The steel framed '73 or Henry less so. But any of these rifles, steel framed or brass framed, will give years of service when fired with ammunition that does not exceed SAAMI spec for pressure. You do not have to restrict them to cowboy or 'cowgirl' loads.
Driftwood Johnson is offline  
Old February 23, 2018, 04:00 PM   #24
ThomasT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 22, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,746
Savvy-Jack I saved the link you posted so I can do some reading there. Thanks.
ThomasT is offline  
Old February 23, 2018, 04:46 PM   #25
Savvy_Jack
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 4, 2018
Posts: 220
Driftwood, glad to hear. I remember when CapNBall posted his video on youtube back in November 2011 comparing factory hunting loads for thr mag and the -40. There was a lot of talk back then but I gave up following it. You might remember I kind of went through the same issues with the Uberti "Buckhorn" revolver. I use it for the 44-40 but when I use the magnum cylinder, I keep it simple.

ratshooter, thanks and I hope you enjoy it.
Savvy_Jack is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.19125 seconds with 10 queries