The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 14, 2018, 06:26 PM   #1
Venti30
Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2018
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 74
Hodgdon HP38 for 9mm plinking ammo

When I started loading 9mm roughly 4 months ago I started using, and haven't changed since then, HP38. It seemed to have a low cost per round for my bullet weight, (115 grain most times) 4.3-4.8 min max range and my thinking at the time was simply economical choice because my wife and I shoot a good bit, probably 800 to 1000 rounds a month.

Not making match grade of any kind, just good honest target practice ammo. I'd be curious to hear if anyone has another preference for plinking ammo? I'm still new enough at reloading that frankly I don't know that I'd notice the fine nuances of faster/slower burning powder and I'm sure there's reason to consider that as a factor, I'm just not there yet in my learning journey, but would love to hear your input.
Venti30 is offline  
Old March 14, 2018, 06:38 PM   #2
Hammerhead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 31, 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,432
I don't load 9mm anymore, but loved HP38 in it. Works very well in 357 and 45 auto too. It has all the nice qualities you want, metering, clean burning, soft recoil, economy and accuracy.
Hammerhead is offline  
Old March 14, 2018, 07:01 PM   #3
Nick_C_S
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2013
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,512
Quote:
Hodgdon HP38 for 9mm plinking ammo
Yes. Most definitely.

For general range shooters, HP-38 (or Winchester 231 - they are the same propellant with different labeling) works great in 9mm. Especially with 115 grain bullets. But will do well with 124's too.

You can look for a better propellant choice, but you won't likely find one significantly better in any way. HP-38/9mm/115 is a great combo. Load away.
__________________
Gun control laws benefit only criminals and politicians - but then, I repeat myself.
Life Member, National Rifle Association
Nick_C_S is offline  
Old March 14, 2018, 09:23 PM   #4
snakeye
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 5, 2013
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 127
HP-38 is perfect for the reasons you describe....I use a lot of it.....no reason to change if your happy with it
snakeye is offline  
Old March 14, 2018, 10:09 PM   #5
bbqncigars
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 1, 2009
Location: Iowa
Posts: 525
I feed my Sig P210 American nothing but HP38. It likes the powder very much.
__________________
"Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most." A. Brilliant
bbqncigars is offline  
Old March 15, 2018, 06:35 AM   #6
locknloader
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 28, 2017
Posts: 164
I've been using HP-38 as well for 9mm 124gr FMJ's. Middle of the suggested power charge range gives me a nice round comparable to factory ammo.

The one thing i dislike about HP-38 is it's so light it tends to have a few grains of powder jump out of the case while i'm working the press.

For super light recoil loads i've had success with titegroup just a bit above the minimum suggested powder charge. If you run the minimum i found the powder burns very dirty.
locknloader is offline  
Old March 16, 2018, 07:55 AM   #7
kmw1954
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 11, 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,524
I too am a believer in HP-38 in the 9mm. At the same time I have also started using Ramshot Silhouette in the 9mm. The reason being is I do a lot of shooting indoors and I have found that the Ramshot does as advertised and does reduce smoke. This was noticeable right away and even my wife commented after the 1st range trip with it.

It's a little slower powder but burns clean and I haven't noticed any fall-off in performance. So if you too are shooting indoors a lot it might be worth a look.
kmw1954 is offline  
Old March 16, 2018, 10:18 AM   #8
jag2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 30, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 773
It is certainly a good powder for 9mm but why is cost a factor? For maybe a dollar or two per pound either way there a lot of other powders to try. Thats part of the fun in reloading. Accurate #5 and Win AutoComp are two of my favorites, but thats just me. Considering how many rounds of 9mm come out of one pound cost is just no big deal. Since I tried the two I mentioned I haven't used 231 in 9mm for probably ten years. Experiment a little!
jag2 is offline  
Old March 16, 2018, 10:47 AM   #9
Venti30
Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2018
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 74
Hi Jag2,

I probably worded that too quickly. See, when I was starting out, I was expecting to have experimental and production errors as I got my self oriented. In saying that, my research included how many grains per round for this or that recipe. The HP38 made sense at the time of my initiation with starting loads in the low 4 grain area, so my overall rounds per pound was appearing to be higher with HP38 than some other powders. So I suppose I shouldve said rounds per pound or something else. Puffier/fluffier or whatever it's referred to as powders would have produced less rounds per pound from what information I was looking at in the beginning.

As it turns out, I've found HP38 to work just fine for my purposes, and was just curios what other's input on the topic of powder selection would be.

Thanks to all for your input! I don't have any local friends that reload, so this is where all my discussion is currently occurring. Good to hear all the different points of view.
__________________
P226 Legion | EDC P365 | 938 | MPX | P320C RX | Spikes Tactical Brown Recluse | Dillon RL1050
Venti30 is offline  
Old March 16, 2018, 11:33 AM   #10
kmw1954
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 11, 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,524
Venti30 I believe what your confusing is burn rate and powder density.

The 2 powders I mentioned have different burn rates but when measured out in a volumetric filler they both use about the same space even though one is using about 1.0 grain more powder. The same is true with the Accurate #5 powder. It is slower but is more dense and takes up less space than HP-38.

With the testing I've done with 3 powders in 9mm; HP-38, Ramshot Silhouette and Accurate #5 I think I've settled on the HP-38 and the Ramshot because it works so well in the 9mm and the Ramshot works very well in my 380. After I use up the AA#5 I am going to try some AA#2 and see how that performs.
kmw1954 is offline  
Old March 16, 2018, 11:33 PM   #11
hdwhit
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 22, 2017
Posts: 1,011
I use HP-38 in 9mm.

I prefer Hi-Skor 800X. But, I load on a single stage press, throw my charges light and trickle each one up to the desired weight, so the fact 800X does not meter well doesn't impact me. At 800 rounds a month, you need something that will flow readily through the powder measure and HP-38 is hard to beat for that.
hdwhit is offline  
Old March 17, 2018, 12:09 PM   #12
Nick_C_S
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2013
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,512
What bullets?

Venti30: We're curious specifically what bullets you are using.

Brand? Weight? Profile (FP, RN, JHP, etc.)? Construction (lead, plated, jacketed, coated, etc.)?
__________________
Gun control laws benefit only criminals and politicians - but then, I repeat myself.
Life Member, National Rifle Association
Nick_C_S is offline  
Old March 17, 2018, 12:18 PM   #13
zeke
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 1999
Location: NW Wi
Posts: 1,665
There are a lot of powders that work very well for 9mm 115 fmj. Have switched to hp-38 because 7625 was discontinued, and am already using hp-38 for lead target rounds in multiple calibers. That and it is commonly available and generally inexpensive.

Last edited by zeke; March 20, 2018 at 07:49 AM.
zeke is offline  
Old March 17, 2018, 12:26 PM   #14
mikejonestkd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2006
Location: Brockport, NY
Posts: 3,715
I use a ton of HP-38/ win 231 in the 9mm with 115gr bullets. its like peas and carrots....
__________________
You are the bows from which your children as living arrows are sent forth.
mikejonestkd is offline  
Old March 17, 2018, 12:44 PM   #15
Nick_C_S
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2013
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,512
Quote:
it (HP-38/W231) is commonly available and generally inexpensive.
Just wait 'till the next shortage. It'll be the first propellant to dry up; and the last to become abundant again.
__________________
Gun control laws benefit only criminals and politicians - but then, I repeat myself.
Life Member, National Rifle Association
Nick_C_S is offline  
Old March 17, 2018, 09:37 PM   #16
Venti30
Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2018
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 74
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick_C_S View Post
Venti30: We're curious specifically what bullets you are using.

Brand? Weight? Profile (FP, RN, JHP, etc.)? Construction (lead, plated, jacketed, coated, etc.)?
Hi Nick

I load 9mm Berry’s plated in two flavors. 115 and 124 grain, RN for both weights.
__________________
P226 Legion | EDC P365 | 938 | MPX | P320C RX | Spikes Tactical Brown Recluse | Dillon RL1050
Venti30 is offline  
Old March 17, 2018, 10:03 PM   #17
kmw1954
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 11, 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,524
Venti30 I'm using 3 9mm plated bullets. 115gr RN from both Berry's and XTREME depending on who has the best sale at the time and 124gr Berry's Hollow Base Flap Point. The cost a little more but I really like them enough to pay the extra.

So far I haven't tried the Rainiers. Last time they were on Sale at CABELA'S they were completely out of stock. Imagine that!
kmw1954 is offline  
Old March 18, 2018, 05:33 AM   #18
jetinteriorguy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 28, 2013
Posts: 3,152
HP-38 is a great powder, but for plinking I like Clays much better. In 9mm I've used HP-38, 700-X, HS6, Titegroup, Accurate#5, Red Dot, and Bullseye with fairly good success. Each has its own particular characteristics and I still use 700-X, HS6, Titegroup, and Clays as my main powders for 9mm. Of these, Clays is my favorite. It's economical, very accurate, burns pretty clean, and seems to have a lighter feeling recoil. Now I know that the recoil is probably a matter of perception, but this is my perception. Your mileage may vary, but I would definitely suggest you give it a try.
jetinteriorguy is offline  
Old March 18, 2018, 09:18 PM   #19
Nick_C_S
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2013
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,512
Quote:
Berry’s plated in two flavors. 115 and 124 grain, RN
Thanks. Good choice(s). Yes, HP-38 will do quite well. And since your bullets are plated, TiteGroup should get honorable mention here. TG is quite economical too (keeping in mind that the propellant is the least costly of the components - never factors in on my powder choice).

There's been a good amount of talk about Accurate #5 here. It's really good stuff. But for your application (range shooters), I think AA5 runs a little slow for the 115's. It would do better with the 124's. AA5 is suited to make some pretty spunky ammo for compact 9mm's; including up to defense levels.

All that said, if you already have HP-38, there's really no reason to search for something "better."
__________________
Gun control laws benefit only criminals and politicians - but then, I repeat myself.
Life Member, National Rifle Association
Nick_C_S is offline  
Old March 18, 2018, 10:30 PM   #20
kmw1954
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 11, 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,524
I am sold on the hp-38 in the 9mm Works well at all levels and is clean and easy to use. Only thing that I find about it is that I cannot find a load with it that works well in my 380 with a 100gr plated bullet. I've talked with many that use it in 380 with success but they all seem to be using lighter bullets.
kmw1954 is offline  
Old March 19, 2018, 01:00 PM   #21
ilmonster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 4, 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 180
HP-38 or Win. 231 powder is all I use in my handgun calibers. I reload 9mm with Berry's 115 gr plated (4.6gr. HP-38), .38 Spcl, .44 Spcl and .45 ACP with great results! It's nice not to have to have four different powders for four different handgun rounds, and they all shoot well. The .44 Spcl rounds in my SuperBlackhawk are like a lazer and so are the .45 ACP rounds in my Les Baer.
ilmonster is offline  
Old March 19, 2018, 02:47 PM   #22
kmw1954
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 11, 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,524
ilmonster what part of the state you in? I'm down on the S. border.
kmw1954 is offline  
Old March 19, 2018, 04:05 PM   #23
Tsquared
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 26, 2016
Location: NE Atlanta
Posts: 337
I have a couple of good 124/125gr loads with HP-38. I found it worked better on the upper end of the recommended load data provided by Hodgdon.

I have been using CFEpistol for the past 14 months. My guns run a lot cleaner with the CFE.
Tsquared is offline  
Old March 19, 2018, 04:37 PM   #24
ilmonster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 4, 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 180
kmw1954, I'm in the Milwaukee area, and shoot at an indoor range in Brkfld in winter and Daniel Boone in summer.
ilmonster is offline  
Old March 24, 2018, 05:04 PM   #25
NorthernBlue
Member
 
Join Date: July 29, 2016
Location: Alaska
Posts: 56
I have been using TiteGroup for my 9mm loadings. 115 and 124 Berrys as well as 115 Hornady XTP. 115gn Berrys is at 4.2gns, 124 Berrys is at 3.9gns and the XTP is 4.6gns. 500 of the XTPs are loaded in nickle cases and stuffed away in storage. They shot well in my Glock 19, 43 and M&P. The Berrys are used at the range for training. I have about a pound and half of TiteGroup left. Once I use it all up I might try something else. Not sure what yet...

The 124gn Berrys loading has about the same feel as 124gn +P GoldenSabers. The GoldenSabers are what I use as a carry load.
NorthernBlue is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.10939 seconds with 10 queries