|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 15, 2018, 07:45 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: April 17, 2017
Location: Sportsman's Paradise
Posts: 19
|
S&W 500 - Large Rifle Primers OR Large Rifle Magnum Primers?
I own a few reloading manuals, all of which call for LRP's for the 500. I recently noticed on Hodgdon's website they call for LRMP's. I called and they just said it gives better ignition. Never had a problem thus far with regular large rifle primers as far as misfires or unburnt powder. I am aware that H110 doesn't acclimate well in real cold temperatures (maybe this is why?) Anyone out there see any differences? Had any issues?
__________________
“ “To achieve victory we must mass our forces at the hub of all power and movement. The enemy’s "center of gravity” ― Karl Von Clausewitz |
January 16, 2018, 12:36 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 960
|
I don't load for the 500 but I do for the 460.
You probably know that there is brass out there for the 500 that uses "Large Pistol" primers. Make sure you stay away from that. My understanding is that if your brass is made to utilize "Large Rifle" primers then there will be an "R" added to the headstamp. This should not be taken lightly as a Large Rifle primer in a case made for Large Pistol primers will leave the Rifle primer standing proud of the case head and this will be VERY dangerous when you place them into your revolver and fire one as the remaining rounds will then move back violently against the frame and if the primers are too tall they can go off with catastrophic results to you and those around you. As for whether you should use "Large Rifle Magnum" or just "Large Rifle", I would go with the Magnums myself and I always use "Large Rifle Magnums" in my 460. |
January 16, 2018, 04:02 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: April 17, 2017
Location: Sportsman's Paradise
Posts: 19
|
LR vs LRP
I agree with ya. Yes I pay attention to the "R". I think I only ran across one case that didn't have anything denoting primers and just left it alone. The loads I make aren't too hot and not having a problem burning powder. And I definitely pay attention to seating depth of primers! Also learned to stay away from Titegroup for the 500 lol (very bad). My next investment WILL be a 460! Very sweet to have 3 different caliber options in one wheel gun!
__________________
“ “To achieve victory we must mass our forces at the hub of all power and movement. The enemy’s "center of gravity” ― Karl Von Clausewitz |
January 17, 2018, 12:34 AM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 960
|
Quote:
45 Cowboy, 45 Schofield, 45 Colt, (45 Colt Ruger Loads), 454 Casull, 460 Magnum I love my 460! So much fun to load for and shoot. Always gets peoples attention at the range. ( Just like the 500 ) |
|
January 17, 2018, 06:19 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 21, 2013
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,695
|
Load a lot for the 460, experimented with both LRP's and LRMP's and saw no difference in accuracy or performance. Some will comment that ball powders respond favorably from using mag primers but I never saw any conclusive data when I tested with a chrono.
__________________
"To be old an wise you must have been young and stupid" |
January 17, 2018, 12:11 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 960
|
Quote:
|
|
January 17, 2018, 12:14 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2017
Posts: 1,868
|
If you don't know, the best advice I can think of is to revert back to what the loading manual say's.
|
January 17, 2018, 02:06 PM | #8 | |
Member
Join Date: April 17, 2017
Location: Sportsman's Paradise
Posts: 19
|
Quote:
__________________
“ “To achieve victory we must mass our forces at the hub of all power and movement. The enemy’s "center of gravity” ― Karl Von Clausewitz |
|
January 17, 2018, 05:29 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 960
|
Quote:
I am in the market for another big bore myself. I'm just not sure which one yet..... |
|
January 17, 2018, 07:22 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: April 17, 2017
Location: Sportsman's Paradise
Posts: 19
|
What about the 480 Ruger? Or 41 magnum?
__________________
“ “To achieve victory we must mass our forces at the hub of all power and movement. The enemy’s "center of gravity” ― Karl Von Clausewitz |
January 17, 2018, 08:04 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 21, 2013
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,695
|
Quote:
__________________
"To be old an wise you must have been young and stupid" |
|
January 17, 2018, 08:18 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2012
Posts: 6,165
|
Use whatever primer your data says use. If it was developed with standard and you switch to magnum, 99% of the time, you raised the pressure.
|
January 18, 2018, 08:05 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 960
|
Quote:
I am a hand loader for sure, could not shoot these guns otherwise. You probably know, you should not load 45 caliber bullets in the 460 unless they are sufficiently hard to prevent deformation in the forcing cone. I stick with hard cast of 20 BHN or more hardness and Jacketed bullets made for the Casull and 460 specifically. Like I said, all the data I have for the 460 calls for a Magnum primer and I believe that is true for the 500 also with the exception of the brass made for Large Pistol Magnums that I mentioned above. Shoot Straight. |
|
Tags |
500 s&w , h110 , primers |
|
|