|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 30, 2019, 07:48 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 5, 2009
Location: French, currently living in US
Posts: 162
|
Question about the PIAT
I went to a small reenactment/display over the past weekend. One group had an interesting assortment of weapons....included a cardboard tube replica of a British antitank device called a PIAT (and very decent replica at that).
The owner of the display said he couldn't get a real PIAT because it is listed as a Class III Destructive Device. This came as a surprise to me. The PIAT is basically a spring loaded thingy....it requires a Class III permit?? Can anyone confirm this? How odd! I once saw one for sale at a gun show several years ago, what a weird thing. |
April 30, 2019, 10:55 PM | #2 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,833
|
Projector, Infantry, Anti Tank PIAT
is a spring powered launcher that essentially lobs a hollow charge "bomb", to do the same job as a bazooka, but without the rocket motor of the bazooka round's back blast giving away the launcher's position. The hollow charge projectile does not rely on velocity to penetrate armor.
Short range, reportedly brutal recoil, very British. And a real bear to cock, so I've heard. I do not know if (or why) the ATF would list the launcher as a destructive device. Its possible the guy who told you that was misinformed. Ask the ATF, they are the only definitive source for what they do, and don't do. Each live round for the PIAT would absolutely be a destructive device. The launcher? I don't know, they might if they use simple bore size as the determining factor, you'll have to ask the ATF. sorry
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
May 1, 2019, 12:04 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2008
Posts: 2,199
|
I would think that being spring powered, it would not fall under the NFA...but I might be wrong. After all, certain shoe laces are machine guns.
|
May 1, 2019, 06:58 AM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 5, 2009
Location: French, currently living in US
Posts: 162
|
I looked at the ATF website and did find the PIAT specifically listed under this provision:
Quote:
So...it seems it IS a Class 3 device. So bizarre that a giant spring loaded caulk gun would be listed as such. |
|
May 1, 2019, 09:51 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
|
"...a giant spring loaded caulk gun..." Isn't remotely like a caulking gun. No spring in one of those.
"...reportedly brutal recoil..." That recoil was used to recock the big spring. In any case, how the thing is/was powered has nothing to do with it's Classification. Your unelected ATF is allowed, by your elected representatives, to make law by regulation. They have made a lot of odd regulations. Like 7.62 x 51 NATO AP ammo being too evil to possess, but .30-06 AP ammo is not. Supposedly due to there being a handgun that uses .308Win ammo. Worst of it is that they've exported the idea of unelected civil servants being allowed to make law by regulation.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count! |
May 1, 2019, 09:54 AM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
|
Quote:
M79s are spring powered. Grenades are spring powered. Striker 12s are spring powered. Look at "launching" devices this way, as a very broad generalization: Does it have an intact firing mechanism? Probably a DD. Does it lack a firing mechanism? Probably not a DD.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
|
May 1, 2019, 12:18 PM | #7 | |||||
Senior Member
Join Date: January 23, 2006
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 3,084
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
2. You've never looked at a PIAT, otherwise you would understand the comparison. 3. True, a caulking gun doesn't have a spring, but a "spring loaded caulk gun" DOES. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Need a FFL in Dallas/Plano/Allen/Frisco/McKinney ? Just EMAIL me. $20 transfers ($10 for CHL, active military,police,fire or schoolteachers) Plano, Texas...........the Gun Nut Capitol of Gun Culture, USA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pELwCqz2JfE |
|||||
May 1, 2019, 01:40 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 5, 2009
Location: French, currently living in US
Posts: 162
|
The thing has peaked my curiosity so I looked ATF website to see what they say. Oddly, I found somewhat conflicting answers.
One PDF I found (from 2007) states the PIAT is a non DD and removed from NFA, but still subject to the normal firearms laws (meaning it is still considered a firearm). Then I found a PDF for regs dating as of last year...and THERE, I found PIAT was listed as a Section IV — NFA firearms classified as curios or relics, still subject to the provisions of 26 U.S.C. Chapter 53, the National Firearms Act, and 18 U.S.C. Chapter 44, the Gun Control Act of 1968 (April 2018). So which is it? Was it "promoted" to Class 3 or am I reading it incorrectly? |
May 1, 2019, 02:03 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,541
|
I don't know the status of the launcher for sure, but a live shell would be a Destructive Device.
|
May 1, 2019, 03:53 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 15, 2011
Location: N Ireland. UK.
Posts: 1,809
|
It wasn't spring lunched as such, it was basically a spigot mortar.
|
May 1, 2019, 07:31 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 23, 2006
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 3,084
|
Quote:
__________________
Need a FFL in Dallas/Plano/Allen/Frisco/McKinney ? Just EMAIL me. $20 transfers ($10 for CHL, active military,police,fire or schoolteachers) Plano, Texas...........the Gun Nut Capitol of Gun Culture, USA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pELwCqz2JfE |
|
May 2, 2019, 12:49 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2008
Posts: 2,199
|
I was under the impression that the PIAT used the spring to launch the round. It appears I may be mistaken and that the round did fire a propellant charge...?
If so, the PIAT would "expel a projectile by the action of an explosive or other propellant" and fall under the NFA definitions. |
May 2, 2019, 06:11 AM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 5, 2009
Location: French, currently living in US
Posts: 162
|
Quote:
From what I can tell, there was a small little capsule charge which is inserted into the projectile tube, I think with the power of a short shotgun shell. When the piston was released, the piston struck the charge which did two things at once: it sent the projectile on it's trajectory and blew the piston back into cocked position. Without the charge, the projectile goes no more than 15-20 feet and the piston does not recock itself. These charge capsules were carried in a tin. There is no propellant within the projectile. I suppose the piston within the launcher is considered a "firing pin". So, the PIAT is considered a firearm but is it still classified as a DD? It seems that as recent as 2008 it was taken OFF the DD classification, but then put back on? Last edited by Famas; May 2, 2019 at 06:34 AM. |
|
May 5, 2019, 09:40 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 5, 2009
Location: Uh-Hi-O
Posts: 3,006
|
__________________
"9mm has a very long history of being a pointy little bullet moving quickly" --Sevens |
May 6, 2019, 08:37 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2008
Posts: 2,199
|
Well, if Ian McCollum says it is classified as an NFA item, I'd probably trust that, haha.
|
May 7, 2019, 07:43 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 2018
Posts: 217
|
As someone who has actually fired one several times I tend to disagree with a lot of the guesses . They are not that hard to cock for a normal strength guy , I can see where gun Jesus would have a problem as he is kind of girly [ see ponytail ] . As usual he is a poor source of info , he does not know that the Piat he is showing has the mortar bomb adapter in it . The piat shoots an anti-tank shaped charge bomb OR a 2 inch mortar bomb . The spring does most of the launching , the charge spends most of its power recocking the spring with the Piat bomb , it only adds a little distance . The mortar bomb does not use a charge at all .
|
May 7, 2019, 10:56 AM | #17 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: January 23, 2006
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 3,084
|
Quote:
Quote:
Is it a post WWII round? According to the Brits, only four types of ammunition were used in the PIAT: Quote:
.
__________________
Need a FFL in Dallas/Plano/Allen/Frisco/McKinney ? Just EMAIL me. $20 transfers ($10 for CHL, active military,police,fire or schoolteachers) Plano, Texas...........the Gun Nut Capitol of Gun Culture, USA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pELwCqz2JfE |
|||
May 7, 2019, 02:38 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 2018
Posts: 217
|
It is a the round normally fired from a mortar . You know the tube with a base plate .
|
May 7, 2019, 05:33 PM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 23, 2006
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 3,084
|
Quote:
And this mortar round does not have propellant? And is propelled solely by a spring in the "tube with a base plate"? You denigrate previous posts yet seem to know not nearly as much as you claim.The more you post the less you tell.
__________________
Need a FFL in Dallas/Plano/Allen/Frisco/McKinney ? Just EMAIL me. $20 transfers ($10 for CHL, active military,police,fire or schoolteachers) Plano, Texas...........the Gun Nut Capitol of Gun Culture, USA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pELwCqz2JfE |
|
May 7, 2019, 06:17 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 11, 2008
Posts: 197
|
As I understand it,the PIAT gun was originally classified as a DD, but removed from the list upon review. Of course, a live 'bomb' would be a DD.
|
|
|