|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 29, 2009, 11:28 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: March 28, 2009
Posts: 73
|
Ruger Mini vs AR-15? Advice Please!
I posted another thread about 7.62 vs 223 for self defense, and no one really answered my question. The debate got into pistols vs. shotguns vs. rifles for home defense. I have a 45 ACP that is my bedside gun for intrusion defense. I have shotguns, I have a bolt action .270. What I want is a semi-auto rifle that will take hi-cap mags (20 or 30 rnd). Lets be clear, I have no real need for this rifle. I live in IL and hunting large game with a rifle is prohibited. So this rifle purchase will be purely out of WANT, not need. I will use for recreational shooting only. Now, I want to be able to use for long range perimeter defense should the need ever arise. This will likely be my only semi auto rifle purchase. I want something versitle, fun, accurate, and reliable. I'm trying to decide between a Mini 30 in 7.62, a Mini 14 in .223/5.56, or AR-15 in .223/5.56. I don't reload, so ammo cost/availability is an issue. I suppose what I want is probably an AR, but I see the Mini is cheaper in both calibers. Is the AR worth the extra $300 over the mini or for my purposes shoud I just go cheap? Advice please?
Last edited by blackdog_507; March 29, 2009 at 11:43 AM. |
March 29, 2009, 11:36 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 26, 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 537
|
The mini-14 is going to be a bit cheaper, but will also be less accurate than the AR. Unless you-re shooting out past 300 or 400 yards, the .223 ought to be sufficient to ward off trouble (this not being a battle field, once the bad guy is hit 300yrds from his target, I doubt hes going to persist).
On a strict cost basis, the mini 14 in .223 will be cheaper and reasonably accurate. The mini 30 will be a bit more of an investment because of the ammo cost. The AR in either caliber wil be a bit more of an investment for a quality rifle, but quality is always expensive. It really depends on which one you can shoot more consistently and what your budget is. Last edited by THEZACHARIAS; March 29, 2009 at 12:07 PM. |
March 29, 2009, 11:44 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 29, 2008
Location: The retarded place below Idaho
Posts: 1,408
|
I have shot the mini's in .223 and 7.62 as well as several configurations of ar's. From an accuracy stand point the .223 is the winner, although the 7.62 out of the mini 30 is far better than out of an sks or an ak. If you have the ability to do so, go shoot both. I personally like the ar's better, but the rugers are very good guns, I just like the way the ar handles better. Either one should give you many years of shooting fun.
|
March 29, 2009, 11:46 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 27, 2009
Location: British Columbia Canada
Posts: 277
|
ar-15 hands down. but the new tatical rugers do looks spiffy
but you wont get dissapointed on the ar-15. I have bought one and their even fun to clean. (for now anyways.) the accurracy is great mind you I dont have any optics, just the iron sights. but youll enjoy it plus just the look of the ar-15 will scare people off.
__________________
"Dear Governor Axtell. I've heard that you will give 200 dollars for my head. Perhaps we should meet and talk. I am at the Juarez village at the border. Send 3 men, and instruct them not to shoot, as I am unarmed. In short, Sir; I surrender. Your obedient servant William H. Bonney. PS: I changed my mind. Kiss my ass." |
March 29, 2009, 11:48 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 25, 2008
Posts: 3,004
|
What is that thing....:barf:
Tehy took a large capacity semiauto with a standard stock And made it mall-ninja approved
__________________
Check us out: www.imfdb.org. Fun site for people who love gun movies. |
March 29, 2009, 11:49 AM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 22, 2007
Location: Central Missouri
Posts: 552
|
Quote:
Accuracy, reliability, availability of mags, etc.; get the AR. |
|
March 29, 2009, 12:03 PM | #7 |
Junior member
Join Date: August 5, 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,982
|
1) Minis will be considerably less accurate than a AR platform. Expect group sizes at least twice as large.
2) Minis are notorious for poor reliability with aftermarket magazines. 3) Expect factory mini magazines to cost 3x as much as USGI m16 (AR 15) magazines. 4) Other options to consider are: Keltec su 16 (uses m16 mags, comparable accuracy and price as a mini) Saiga in .223 or 762x39 (comparable accuracy, price, and magazine costs) AR 15 in 7.62x39 (better accuracy than minis, more expensive, comparable mag prices) |
March 29, 2009, 12:06 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
|
When the Anchorage Police Dept started there SWAT (they called it SRT) team, I was taske with doing the original rifle training. For some unknown reason they chose the Mini 14 instead of the M16s ( I think it was because the Troopers had M16s).
Anyway the sucked. I had to drop the standreds Cutting back shooting to no more then 200 yards, With the promise they would send some of the members to my sniper school. They finely got smart and dumped them for the M16s. I've had a couple civilian versions of the Mini 14, I wasnt impressed. This is just my opinion, but I put the Mini's in the same class as the AKs fun is you just want to burn up ammo, but if you are serious about shooting, get an AR system. I do remember everyone begging Brownells for info on accurizing the minis. I've been out of the gunsmithing business for a while, I dont know if someone came up with something or not. JMHO
__________________
Kraig Stuart CPT USAR Ret USAMU Sniper School Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071 |
March 29, 2009, 01:03 PM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: March 14, 2009
Location: Montana
Posts: 63
|
I own both a mini and ar's. Good info on the previous posts. The mini is a fun plinker and if you are shooting targets be prepared to see accuracy drop off when firing quickshots as the I think the barrel integrity decreases with the increase in heat. The upside is that the mini 14 is durable and reliable with any kind of ammo. They have a reputation of always going boom. Look at how open the design of the reciever is and if you have shot one, you know that if you want to save your brass, you will have to search a 30 yard arc to find them! They definitely chuck them. If you can find one to go shoot and see if you like it. And if you do buy one, look for the magazines first. I have found 30rd reliable non-Ruger mags for about $35/ea.
I do shoot the AR rifles 90% of the time, but I cannot seem to part with the mini either or any other gun for that matter. |
March 29, 2009, 01:12 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 22, 2007
Location: Central Missouri
Posts: 552
|
Quote:
On the other hand, if it would shoot well and be reliable, I might take a Mini over an AR. That's just personal preference. I like the look and feel of the Mini - I like my ARs fine; they're lots of fun, but I haven't completely warmed up to pistol grips, an off side safety, and the fact that no one makes a butt stock to give tallish folks a reasonable length of pull. If I put any amount of scope on an AR, I have to mount it on a riser to move it forward, but I get by without on one of them. Bitch - bitch - bitch... maybe I should only have bolt guns? |
|
March 29, 2009, 01:20 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 22, 2007
Location: Central Missouri
Posts: 552
|
Quote:
I'd like to try some ammo besides Remington and Silver State, but there's none to be had. (6.8 rem spc) |
|
March 29, 2009, 01:36 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 27, 2009
Location: British Columbia Canada
Posts: 277
|
SPUSCG I think one reason why people want an ar is for its tatical look, their for I posted a picture of a tatical mini. Im in no way endorsing it im just trying to help him with options.
__________________
"Dear Governor Axtell. I've heard that you will give 200 dollars for my head. Perhaps we should meet and talk. I am at the Juarez village at the border. Send 3 men, and instruct them not to shoot, as I am unarmed. In short, Sir; I surrender. Your obedient servant William H. Bonney. PS: I changed my mind. Kiss my ass." |
March 29, 2009, 01:44 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
|
Quote:
__________________
Kraig Stuart CPT USAR Ret USAMU Sniper School Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071 |
|
March 29, 2009, 01:48 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 25, 2008
Posts: 3,004
|
I've alaways wanted a high capacity semiauto but I'm going the m1a route eventually, I just can't STAND PISTOL GRIPS Rifles are a little better on PGs as I can use them, but prefer not to. On shotguns I just ask "why, I can't even carry it confortably."
__________________
Check us out: www.imfdb.org. Fun site for people who love gun movies. |
March 29, 2009, 04:34 PM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: December 8, 2008
Posts: 20
|
M-4
Buy a M-4 in .223 and stick with Colt, LMT, or Noveske. Go to m4carbine.net and do some reading before you buy.
|
March 29, 2009, 05:49 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2008
Posts: 145
|
If it's just for plinking they both are great. I have an AR and my nephew a mini 14. When we are goofing around I can shoot his mini stupidly fast. Not so much with the AR.
The after market mags tend to suck though for the mini. |
March 29, 2009, 05:57 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 17, 2007
Location: Western NY
Posts: 925
|
Mini is the winner!!
Don't listen to all these knuckle heads that say a Mini is not accurate - The newer Mini's will by far hold their own. Mine is great and I can definately use it for targets as well as personal defense. Anyone can own an AR-15; they are evrywhere and all look alike. Mini's are unique!!!!
2008 NRA Mini-14
__________________
See Ya! |
March 29, 2009, 06:06 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 18, 2009
Location: NM
Posts: 122
|
AR
get the AR all the way. the mini isn't any more unique then an AR. The AR has way more upgradable options. Plus since cost of ammo is an issue for you then throw a .22 conversion kit in the AR. The kit will cost you 100 bucks and that alone will make up the price difference in the two guns after a bunch of .22s. Its great practice and a BLAST!! Good luck.
|
March 29, 2009, 06:17 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 25, 2008
Posts: 3,004
|
The problem with ARs are everyone slaps on as much tacti-cool stuff as possible, I haven't seen a standard AR without more rails than the local train yard and a collapsible stock.
__________________
Check us out: www.imfdb.org. Fun site for people who love gun movies. |
March 29, 2009, 06:28 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 14, 2008
Posts: 194
|
i keep hearing the "new" minis are much more accurate what a crock,i wouldnt invest in one again if my life depended on it.the one i sold 2 yrs ago counldnt hold a a 8 in group at 100 yds,past 50 yds it spread like wildfire across a target and i aint investing $750-800 to figure out if the new ones are any better.worst 223 i ever saw,period! i own a few ARs and they all shoot rings around any mini i ever saw, even my Kel-tec PLR-16 holds alot better groups at 100 than the mini i owned.i hope the barrells are much better and if i did buy another it would be the mini 30 in 7.62x39.
|
March 29, 2009, 07:02 PM | #21 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2005
Location: The Bluegrass
Posts: 9,142
|
Quote:
The minis are notoriously picky about mags. I saw a factory 30 round mag listed for $69. I think the 20 shot mag is listed at $39 at Ruger's site. You can get good quality AR-15 mags for $12 to $18 each. If you can afford the extra money, buy the AR-15. You may want to look specifically at the M4 carbine variation. For the purposes listed by the OP, you don't need top of the line ARs. Just make sure it has iron sights, though those can be added. |
|
March 29, 2009, 08:38 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 22, 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,419
|
That's it...I'm going to start looking to trade this junk-heap and all the crappy mags. |
March 30, 2009, 02:59 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 16, 2007
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 589
|
I've owned 3 Mini-14s in the past and have gotten rid of all of them. I presently own 5 ARs/M-4 clones and will NOT part with any of them. The ARs have it all over the Mini-14s for reliability and accuracy. The ergonomics of the M-4 carbines has it all over the Mini-14s too. In .223 the M-4 clones are the best of the .223 caliber firearms for tactical/defensive work you can have.
|
March 30, 2009, 04:12 AM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 14, 2008
Posts: 194
|
all i know is this, i aint making the same mistake twice in one lifetime, a 223 should at least hold a 2 or 3 in group at a 100 out of an american made rifle,the one i had wouldnt even come close with a scope once the bareel got warm which usually only took 3 to 5 rds or sooner. a good bushie will shoot rings around it
|
March 30, 2009, 04:21 AM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 25, 2009
Location: Camas Washington, USA
Posts: 136
|
i bought one 4 or 5 years ago and the peep sight on it is dead accurate, i see no point of shooting hundreds of Yards. but its true the aftermarket mags are complete crap
|
Tags |
ar-15 , mini 14 , mini 30 , self defense , semiauto |
|
|