|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 24, 2010, 09:23 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 28, 2010
Posts: 137
|
Timely Article About Gun Rights
This was on the Socialist News Network today, (I mean MSNBC).
It was surprisingly well-balanced article overall, giving points to both sides of the CCW issue and individual and states rights. They usually only present the left wing side, but I guess their low ratings have them trying to be more balanced. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34714389...s-life/page/2/ |
March 24, 2010, 09:55 AM | #2 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,383
|
“Tactically, they’ve been brilliant on a lot of issues,” agreed Paul Helmke of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence..."
Sweet... Rand, the spokeswoman for the Violence Policy Center, acknowledged that “we don’t have centralized data-gathering to know what people are doing with these licenses.” “(But) anecdotally, we know they’re doing quite a bit of harm,” she said. We don't know, but we know. Maybe it's that kind of psychospeak that's caused the anti-gun movement to largely collapse in the United States over the past 20 years. I'm rather disappointed that they didn't give anyone from the gun rights side a chance to counter VPC's bogus "Armed Carry Killers" statistics. NRA did a very nice take up on them a couple of days ago.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
March 24, 2010, 10:18 AM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 4, 2007
Location: Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 3,276
|
Quote:
__________________
"The dogs may bark but the caravan moves on" |
|
March 24, 2010, 10:28 AM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
|
They did get the DIG in:
Quote:
I was impressed by the poll that came with the artical.
__________________
Kraig Stuart CPT USAR Ret USAMU Sniper School Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071 |
|
March 24, 2010, 10:30 AM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 16, 2007
Posts: 2,153
|
Quote:
|
|
March 24, 2010, 10:32 AM | #6 | |
Junior member
Join Date: April 16, 2009
Location: Brooksville, FL
Posts: 161
|
Quote:
|
|
March 24, 2010, 10:37 AM | #7 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: June 4, 2007
Location: Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 3,276
|
I also had to laugh at this part...
Quote:
Another conversation with an anti To sum up Quote:
__________________
"The dogs may bark but the caravan moves on" |
||
March 24, 2010, 11:35 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 27, 2009
Posts: 1,086
|
So, I posted in the wrong open window, my post was actually meant for another thread. Sorry.
My stance on this topic is thus: I feel bad that the family has to mourn the loss of one of their kin. I do not feel bad that the criminal was justifiably killed in the course of a committing a crime. But, my heart goes out to his family. There's a different between the family and the victim.
__________________
-liberal gun nut = exception to the rule- -1.24274238 miles, because Russians don't need scopes- -Gun control was the Klan's favorite law, how can you advocate a set of laws designed to allow the denigration of a people?- Last edited by SigP6Carry; March 24, 2010 at 12:01 PM. |
March 24, 2010, 11:42 AM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 12, 2006
Location: NKY
Posts: 12,463
|
Quote:
A criminal or his family should have no legal rights to sue someone who refused to be a victim.
__________________
"He who laughs last, laughs dead." Homer Simpson |
|
March 24, 2010, 02:04 PM | #10 | |
Junior member
Join Date: January 25, 2006
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
Posts: 1,719
|
Quote:
In no way should you read anything in my statement that would imply that I feel the family should be compensated or should be allowed to sue the victim of the crime, because I do not feel that way at all. |
|
March 24, 2010, 02:40 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2009
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,037
|
I am astonished that a news organization with the historical anti-gun bias displayed by MSNBC would print that article.
Rand comes across as ideologically militant and not quite lucid: "“The idea that you send people out into public and if someone else has a gun, you have to kill them, that becomes anarchy,” she said." Excuse me? U.S. laws may vary from state to state, and they may certainly be accused of being inconsistently applied, but to describe the current social status in the United States as "anarchy" suggests that Rand is profoundly confused. May she remain that way for years to come - she comes across as someone who is out of touch with reality.
__________________
Treat everyone you meet with dignity and respect....but have a plan to kill them just in case. |
March 25, 2010, 05:30 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 10,446
|
I'm surprised that our side is winning the poll with such a great margin given the typically leftist audience of MSNBC.
|
|
|