The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 25, 2016, 11:04 PM   #1
fariaguard
Member
 
Join Date: January 13, 2016
Posts: 23
Is static electricity dangerous w/ reloading?

Newbie…..and I’m thinking it is. Please educate me as I don’t want to get blown up! My area is carpeted so it’s probably going to happen with walking and normal operations around and on the bench. I would like to shop vac the area and bench to clean up metal shavings, debris etc. Shop vacs cause static electricity. Of course the powder and accessories that hold powder will be put away before the vacuum is turned on. Any thoughts?

Also I would like to put a 1/8” to 5/32” plastic top over the 2” thick maple bench top to keep it ‘pretty’. I have a relationship with a plastic vendor who can recommend a non static plastic material. This will protect the wood from wear during basic gun cleaning, maintenance and solvents. Some will say I am over thinking the bench cover and I probably am but I want it to last a lifetime.

My concern is safety first and the ONLY area I have is carpeted. Is it time to rip out the carpet? Wife will not be happy!

Thanks as always.
fariaguard is offline  
Old March 26, 2016, 12:59 AM   #2
bedlamite
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 10, 2000
Location: WI
Posts: 1,395
Static is only really a hazard with black powder, not smokeless. I would however find a floor mat to cover the area, because you will eventually drop a primer and/or spill some powder and that will make it much easier to find and clean up.
__________________
A plan is just a list of things that doesn't happen.
bedlamite is offline  
Old March 26, 2016, 05:04 AM   #3
JeepHammer
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2015
Posts: 1,768
I'll second that,
A nice HARD surface makes for MUCH easier clean up.
Those under desk plastic floor coverings are at every office supply store for cheap.

I hate carpet.
You can't get it clean once its laid, only force dirt/water deeper into the carpet/pad,
The amount of fibers a carpet sheds is unbleveable, and anyone that works/cleans computers of heating ducts will tell you to get rid of the carpet.
(Or cover it with something you can clean up)

If you are worried about static, under your maple top, simply run a wire to a mounting bolt on each metal appliance on top,
Get into the habit of touching any of the connected metal when you sit down.

You do NOT have to 'Ground', but you do have to equalize with anything electrically insulated on the work top.

Just for the record, unless that work top has an electrically insulated finish, wood doesn't produce or hold a static charge.

The truely paranoid will connect the metal components to the ground circuit of the home, some have even added an extra ground rod to the homes to connect to...
The 'Round' or 'U' shaped prong on your wall outlet is an 'Earth Ground' or 'Ground' that's readily accessable in most homes.
The screw in the middle of a wall outlet is usually 'Grounded' also.
A small wire from screw to mounted table top gadgets (wire under table) will do the job without being a huge production and still leave the outlets useable.
JeepHammer is offline  
Old March 26, 2016, 08:37 AM   #4
steve4102
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 23, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by bedlamite
Static is only really a hazard with black powder, not smokeless.
Do you have evidence and actual testing to support this? Cuz this tells a different story.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nm6PEdBcQ6s
steve4102 is offline  
Old March 26, 2016, 08:55 AM   #5
Shenna9220
Member
 
Join Date: January 31, 2016
Location: Zephyrhills,Fl
Posts: 78
Those plastic carpet covers can add more static than than the carpet. Wood would be best. If you want to test to see how much of a problem you might have, scoff around in you bear feet on the carpet and then touch one of the metal screws on a walk switch. If you get a shock, you might have issues. The dryer the air the worst the problem will be. I've loaded on carpet for a while and while finding a dropped primer can be a problem ( a small magnet will help ) I have had no issues with static.

We just ripped all the carpet an put down vinyl plank so I'll have a new environment to load in.
Shenna9220 is offline  
Old March 26, 2016, 09:39 AM   #6
FITASC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 6, 2014
Posts: 6,432
You can always get a tight weave area rug for your area so all you have to do is take it outside and shake it clean of any powder spills.

If you are using one of the press mounts that makes it sit on top of the bench, instead of overhanging it, then place your press in a steam table tray - that will contain any spills to the tray
__________________
"I believe that people have a right to decide their own destinies; people own themselves. I also believe that, in a democracy, government exists because (and only so long as) individual citizens give it a 'temporary license to exist'—in exchange for a promise that it will behave itself. In a democracy, you own the government—it doesn't own you."- Frank Zappa
FITASC is offline  
Old March 26, 2016, 09:52 AM   #7
rtpzwms
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 6, 2010
Location: OTS
Posts: 1,035
+1 bedlamite
+1 press in a steam table tray, cookie tin, aluminum tray (cheap) I use one for my MEC 650 works great everything in one place easy cleanup.
__________________
Experience is what you get when you don’t get what you want.
rtpzwms is offline  
Old March 26, 2016, 11:58 AM   #8
T. O'Heir
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
"...don’t want to get blown up..." You won't. Smokeless powder doesn't explode. It just burns quickly.
Nearly every tool you'll be using when reloading from bullet pullers to funnels and powder throwers, is plastic. Nothing to worry about.
"...Wife will not be happy!..." Don't even think about messing with her carpets. You have to live there.
Go buy a copy of The ABC's of Reloading.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count!
T. O'Heir is offline  
Old March 26, 2016, 11:58 AM   #9
Smokey Joe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 14, 2001
Location: State of Confusion
Posts: 2,106
Magnet???

Shenna--I'm puzzled--How can a magnet help to find something that is all brass in its metal components, such as a rifle or pistol primer? Now, shotgun primers are steel, and obviously would respond to a magnet, but shotgun primers are large and not easy to lose, even in a shag carpet. Rifle or pistol primers can get lost in a carpet, but I can't see the advantage in using a magnet to search for them.

Mebbe I'm misunderstanding your post. Could you enlighten me?
__________________
God Bless America

--Smokey Joe
Smokey Joe is offline  
Old March 26, 2016, 12:50 PM   #10
mikld
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 7, 2009
Location: Southern Oregon!
Posts: 2,891
I have been reading about the dangers of static electricity for as long as I've frequented reloading forums (15 yrs.?), but I have yet to read an actual report of any fire, explosion, damage to equipment, etc.. I have experience "static cling" in my powder measures, but that is the extent of my "static electricity concerns". Perhaps this is one of those theories that have been blown way out of proportion by "overly" concerned reloaders and parroted by "believers"...
__________________
My Anchor is holding fast!
I've learned how to stand on my own two knees...
mikld is offline  
Old March 26, 2016, 01:23 PM   #11
RC20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 10, 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 7,014
Nearly every tool we own is designed for reloading

That does not mean plastic in general is safe.

I don't know about or have a static issue but if it is, plastic can be a static issue if its not specifically anti static characteristics

You might look into an office chair anti static shield, they are intended to roll a chair around on and not build up static that zarks a computer.

It might take a couple depending on how long your bench area is.

All my work is in the shop, no carpet and I sweep up my stuff.

Bench needs a new top but it will be wood for a number of reasons.
RC20 is offline  
Old March 26, 2016, 03:25 PM   #12
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,024
{Edit: my browser found the wrong video, so my comments did not apply}.

Fariaguard,

Welcome to the hobby.

If you follow Steve's video, you will see there is no ignition danger from common household static as it is less potent than a stun gun. There are, however, some indirect dangers. One is that you will find that if you have a strong static charge on your body and approach the pan of a scale with your hand, the scale pan will deflect or, with an electric one, merely show the weight numbers getting off. Another is that it is also theoretically possible to damage an electronic scale with a static discharge, thereby causing it to give false readings. Additionally, powder measure hoppers can suffer from static cling, with powder sometimes failing to dispense correctly in the presence of a strong static charge. I've only ever seen a low charge result from this, but low charges can leave a bullet stuck in a barrel and if you then shoot a fully charged round into it, that can burst the gun.

So, basically you don't want to do things that cause charge errors in reloading, so you want to avoid static for that reason. There are several ways to go about it. One is to wear an anti-static wrist band that is grounded. You can also put an anti-static mat under your equipment and just lean your wrists on it periodically to keep the charge off of you. These frequently come with a wrist strap so you don't have to make the extra periodic pause for discharge. You can also get an anti-static anti-fatigue floor mat to stand on, and if you run a ground wire to it, that helps.

Another somewhat ridiculous looking method is to make the proverbial tin foil hat and stick a bunch of straight pins through it from the inside until it looks like a mad sculptor's idea of a porcupine. Wearing that will bleed the charge off your body. What happens is your charge tends to repel itself and it can't accumulate enough unit charges on the sharp pin points to avoid repelling itself into the air. You can make the foil more durable by first attaching it to a construction paper backing with a spray adhesive, and then folding that into the hat. Aluminum tape can be used to back the pin heads so they don't slip out. Just don't let anyone photograph you reloading like this.

But before you bother with any of it, look and see if you are getting weighing errors or not? It all depends on humidity and other factors in your area. I get the pan weight errors where I am if I lean over the scale to read it. But rather than a wrist strap, I have put grounded foil under my bench top and just touch piece of grounded metal when I lean over the scale.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is online now  
Old March 26, 2016, 04:11 PM   #13
Greg Mercurio
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 5, 2010
Posts: 151
Short answer: No.

Ground if you feel like it. It won't hurt a thing except your checkbook.
__________________
Old guy and NRA Life Member
Greg Mercurio is offline  
Old March 26, 2016, 11:44 PM   #14
colbad
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 3, 2012
Posts: 506
I think the key is to keep area clean of spilled powder. Powder on carpet is fire hazard. Years ago I vacuumed up .22 in a traditional type vacuum and it ignited. When I load SG shells I cut one of those dryer sheets into a small strip and put it in powder hopper and fill over it. Hang it so idles not go so deep as to clog. It eliminates static cling to the plastic bottle to give a more reliable powder drop.
colbad is offline  
Old March 27, 2016, 03:01 AM   #15
briandg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2010
Posts: 5,468
something that you should consider in any case is that you should keep your powder separate in small quantities. You don't need more than one can on the bench, putting a pound on the bench with you and a few hunred primers will help ensure your safety if you do happen to somehow set off a fire.

A powder magazine for commercial purposes according to some documentation I once read should be a wooden cabinet with two inches of wood, laminated boards, overlapping with no gaps, no nails that pierce the inside, no metal hardware inside, yadda yadda, essentially wood, capable of blowing out in case of accident, nothing that can cause ignition, and nothing that can damage the individual storage units.

Piling fifty pounds of powder or even hundreds onto an open shelf in a room isn't a good idea. The cans are meant to burst incase of fire, rather than build compression and explode, and most smokeless won't create a hellish fire, and could actually put itself out.

But, the bottom line is that the bulk storage belongs in a stable, dry, cool place, where it is protected as absolutely as possible, and only working quantitities belong on a bench.

I guess I keep about twenty or more pounds on hand at any time, and I keep it along a wall in my basement in a locked wooden cabinet. Id really feel safer with it in several cabinets in several corners. Honestly, if a pound of powder ignited in a room, unless it's full of flammable products, it may self extinguish. The biggest concern I would have is that a house fire could set off a massive burn with ten pounds of powder, and that could be just as bad as a gallon of solvents or thinners.
briandg is offline  
Old March 27, 2016, 10:21 AM   #16
JeepHammer
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2015
Posts: 1,768
Shenna, Anti-static plastic floor covers are everywhere, usually what you are experencing is static from the chair covering when you are on a floor cover, the chair is no longer in direct contact with the floor, so static chargers can't equalize with the general charge in the room.
A plain metal leg chair will usually stop that issue since it won't have synthetic covering on the seat/back to collect a charge.

Steve 4102,
The video you posted is VERY interesting!

I don't know if the guy was trying to show things in laymans terms,
Or if he didn't understand fully the difference in power output when an electrical arc happens...
I'm leaning towards laymans terms since he did exactly the correct things in steps to get to an ignition point.

Any and every electrical arc has three components,

1. Is electrical potential to work with, the 'Charge'.
Charge is usually expressed in 'Watts' or 'Joules'.

2. Is Amperage, the 'Heat' in the arc gap.
(Think welding arc, the more the amperage is cranked up, the 'Hotter' the weld temp)

3. Is the Duration (Time) the arc stays alive in the gap.

Your STARTING 'Charge' has to be high enough to produce Amperage (heat) to ignite the powder,
And it has to be high enough to SUSTAIN (Duration) that amperage level to heat/ignite the powder to get a fire...

Remember, the initial charge is seeking 'Ground' or equalization through the shortest/easiest path, and its only regulated by the conductor path to 'Ground',

As demonstrated in the video, it's usually much too quick (duration) and/or weak (amperage) to set the powder on fire.

Now, if you were to GRIND the powder in to much finer particles (actual powder instead of grannuals) it would be MUCH easier to ignite,
What happens in powder 'Explosions' all the time, no matter if it's gun powder, gain dust, ect.

*IF* we were working with actual 'Powder' in the 50 to 5 micron range, there would be a LOT more fires/explosions from static.
IF there were small powder in the air, there would be a lot more fires/explosions from static.
JeepHammer is offline  
Old March 27, 2016, 11:07 AM   #17
F. Guffey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Posts: 7,249
Quote:
Is static electricity dangerous w/ reloading?
There was an owner of a Dillon RL 550 B that set off a stack of primers in a primer tube. He destroyed the tube and did major damaged to his hand. Like a pistol and or rifle when destroyed by a reloader; ‘Must have been a double charge!” he blamed ‘the accident’ on static electricity. I was not there but I could duplicate the accident 10 times out of 10 tries. The primer tube was folded in the middle, folding the tube in the middle will crush primers. The crushed primers in the center of the tube opened/blew out the tube on one side and ignited the primers above and below the fold.

When something is dropped the first tendency is to grab for it, I can not ignite primers with static electricity but I can fold a loaded primer tube with a ki-rack chop and bust the primers every time.

And then there are antimagnetic watches; it was not what I was looking for and I did not have enough ambition to find out what electricity looked like when it traveled through the brain; nor do I believe recommend using it as a diagnostic tool is a good ideal. But it did not take me long to ‘look at it’ when determining what the problem was.

F. Guffey
F. Guffey is offline  
Old March 27, 2016, 03:25 PM   #18
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,024
Steve4102,

I owe you an apology. For some reason, when I clicked your link I wound up viewing this video instead of the one you intended. No clue why it happened, but when Jeephammer's description didn't match what I saw, I clicked it again and double-checked the URL and this time got the right one.


Jeephammer,

You're close. The charge, Q, on the capacitor will be measured in Coulombs (the number of extra electrons and missing electrons (holes) on the opposing capacitor plates. This is just the voltage on the capacitor times the capacitance in Farads. The amount of potential energy in that charge varies directly with capacitance but as the square of the voltage, and it is the potential energy that is measured in Joules. J=½FV². If you know the energy of the charge and either the voltage or capacitance, you can then rearrange that equation to give you the charge in coulombs on the plates, though it's not usually something you particularly need to know.

A Watt, however, cannot be used to measure charge. A Watt is a measure of power, the rate at which energy is consumed, delivered, converted, or translated. One Watt is defined as an energy rate of one Joule per second, W=J/s.

So, what the fellow in the video is doing is delivering a certain amount of energy, measured in Joules, at a controlled rate, measured in Watts.

The one thing he is doing that I would change is to use an inductor instead of a resistor to control power. As he says himself, that resistor throws energy away. The inductor is extra cost compared to the resistor, but since you then no longer consume power in the resistor, it lets you use a smaller capacitor voltage or else a smaller capacitance. This would save battery life.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is online now  
Old March 27, 2016, 04:02 PM   #19
Clark
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
Posts: 4,678
I have charged money for designing things that survive static electricity, lightning, and EMP [secret, but not top secret] from a nuke attack.

Probably Uncle Nick has too.

The truth is I did the same tricks for all of them.

We have all seen flour mill explosions on TV set off by static electricity.

I am not going say much more about it, but if one puts combustible combinations in a plastic garbage bag, as the bag fills, static may set it off. This can kill. So some guys I know put a drop of water in the bag to prevent static.

I demonstrated an 1867 Kelvin water dropper at the University of Washington Electrical Engineering open house in 1976.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelvin_water_dropper
With a pair of parallel plates as capacitor, the water drops fall for while then there is an explosive spark as it discharges.
__________________
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books."
"Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. If you bought the book, and believe it all, it may FEEL like an ad hominem attack, but you might strive to accept other points of view may exist.
Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought?
Clark is offline  
Old March 27, 2016, 05:46 PM   #20
mikld
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 7, 2009
Location: Southern Oregon!
Posts: 2,891
Good answers, but, just for K.I.S.S. sake and a real life answer; Don't worry about it....
__________________
My Anchor is holding fast!
I've learned how to stand on my own two knees...
mikld is offline  
Old March 27, 2016, 06:11 PM   #21
briandg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2010
Posts: 5,468
I've heard of/seen a lot of primer tube blow ups from a number of causes. It's probably a lot easier to do it than I ever believed it could be. One thing I don't buy into is the talk I have heard about "primer dust"explosions. Primng compound, like smokeless, isn't really prone to dusting, and a bit of primer dust has very little energy. It's kind of unlikely that a serious explosion or burn will occur just by the debris from a day's work, but a sloppy room with loose primers rolling around and spills here and there present risks from lots of things.

Dust explosions are very similar to fuel explosions. Propane, for example, divides a highly reactive product into a molecular size. Grain dust or coal dust are also highly flammable and the products are easily ignited.

Smokeless isn't really easily ignited. Unlike a dust. It's not g gasoline or another volatile product. If all you have is a scattering of powder granules, there is a thing to remember. Powder is also a low intensity "explosive". I've tested several times, and many, many times, those little sparks will not release enough energy to ignite anything that isn't indirect contact, mostly just scattering it. A sprinkle of rifle powder on a hot plate resembles popcorn.

I think that what's been said is that a burst of static electricity can be hot, but i personally believe that smokeless in small quantities, but it of course any bulky amount changes everything.

Bp is a totally different thing, and a bit spooky to me.
briandg is offline  
Old March 27, 2016, 07:18 PM   #22
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,024
Temperature can be very high without starting a fire. It just has to be brief. In the case of the spark, the thermal conductivity and specific heat capacity of the ionized gas is much lower than that of the solid powder. So, at first contact with the powder, what little heat is present at the contact point diffuses into the powder, dropping its temperature and creating a temperature gradient between it and the hot part of the ionized gas. This acts as an insulating gas barrier between the powder and the hot part of the gas. Unless enough time passes to move enough heat through that layer to bring the powder surface temperature up, it won't reach the ignition point. It's akin to being able to swipe your finger through a candle flame without getting burned. You have to hold it there longer for that to happen, giving the heat time to transfer, even though the flame temperature is well above scalding temperature.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is online now  
Old March 27, 2016, 07:51 PM   #23
briandg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2010
Posts: 5,468
ABSOLUTELY. You have several concerns regarding all of the things discussed in this thread, and the simplest way that I can put it is that the actual measure of the energy and the intensity of the energy and the duration of contact are all going to affect a subject material in different ways.

Low energy waves of trillions of tons of water can wash away an entire city in minutes, or dig a mile long trench over a few days without even pushing aside the bigger rocks. Then, a guy with a high pressure waterjet system car saw through steel sheets in a matter of a few seconds using only a gallon or so.

Being able to have a good, solid understanding and working knowledge of energy and materials is why God put tech people on the earth. If there was anything I would wish for when the genie popped out of the lamp, I'd want to be smarter.
briandg is offline  
Old March 27, 2016, 08:48 PM   #24
Gunplummer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2010
Location: South East Pa.
Posts: 3,364
There is an old dynamite factory over the mountain from me. I know quite a few people that are retired from there. The women working there were not even allowed to wear silk underwear because of the static possibility. I know, not the same because civilian dynamite uses nitro and is more dicey to work with than standard gunpowder. Just thought I would toss it in.
Gunplummer is offline  
Old March 27, 2016, 09:33 PM   #25
Clark
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
Posts: 4,678
In jobs where there are electronics and quality systems, those around the electronic must wear static proof smocks. In dealing with 2,000 amp diodes, if my static blew up on of those, I would be a pile of dust. But rules are rules.

I was at a tiny company less than 0.1% of the parent corporation in big trouble for defaulting on a contract schedule. The heads from corporate flew out in their company private jets to observe. I needed a signature for a requisition from the guy at the head of a long conference table. Away from the table were the corporate execs, just watching. I walked the length of the long room with all the eyes on me. When I got to the head of the table I plunked down the form and got my signature. I then noticed my static smock was one snap off all the way down.

The next day all the corporates flew out of there and sold the $50M company for $14M, nothing down, no liability for the default, but keep the corporation name out of the paper.

The company that bought us was smaller than we were. I felt it was a good time to invest in my new client. I can't help but feel my sloppy antistatic smock cost someone $36M and I got a piece of that.
__________________
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books."
"Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. If you bought the book, and believe it all, it may FEEL like an ad hominem attack, but you might strive to accept other points of view may exist.
Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought?
Clark is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.10001 seconds with 8 queries