March 23, 2013, 06:08 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 10, 2012
Posts: 3,881
|
Glock 21 and lswc's ?
Shooting lswc's in a Glock 21 ok or bad idea ?
|
March 23, 2013, 06:14 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 10, 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 444
|
You can shoot lead but I'd limit it's use and instead stick with jacketed bullets because of Glocks polygonal barrel. If you're interested in shooting lead bullets, consider a KKM, Lone Wolf or Storm Lake barrel for your G21.
|
March 23, 2013, 07:14 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 10, 2012
Posts: 3,881
|
Do you have an idea on the price of a new barrel ?
Why did Glock go with that particular type rifling ? |
March 23, 2013, 09:00 PM | #4 |
Junior member
Join Date: June 21, 2009
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 1,176
|
You probably already know it's a bad idea. Why would you ask? We could tell you it's o.k., but we aren't going to replace your gun if it gets damaged.
|
March 23, 2013, 09:20 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 3,829
|
The main advantage of polygonal rifling is that the gas seals better behind the bullet, creating muzzle velocities that are slightly higher and more consistent than traditional rifling. However, because the gas seals better behind the bullet, if there is a build-up of lead in the barrel you're more likely to create an over-pressure situation.
Glock specifically had a few lawsuits from barrels blowing up when people shot lead bullets and didn't clean the lead residue from the barrel often enough, so they caution heavily against it. But it's fine to shoot lead bullets in a polygonal barrel as long as you clean it often enough that lead doesn't build up.
__________________
0331: "Accuracy by volume." |
March 23, 2013, 09:49 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 10, 2012
Posts: 3,881
|
I had heard both ways that you can and can't, thats why I asked on this forum since I figured there would be people on here that would know. I have a chance to buy a Glock 21 that has only been fired 50 times, one box of rounds for a great price. It is mint condition with the box, paper work, one ten round and 2 high capacity mags. Up until now I have mainly fired 95% my own reloaded lswc's.
|
March 23, 2013, 10:00 PM | #7 | ||
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,972
|
Quote:
Quote:
One experiment found that two apparently identical Glock barrels, shooting exactly the same ammunition showed very different effects. One showed a minimal pressure increase after 300 rounds, the other showed twice the effect after only 75 rounds. Double the effect from 4 times fewer rounds. The guy who did the test (Mark Passamaneck, a forensic engineer) decided that the risk wasn't worth it and switched to shooting plated bullets in his Glocks. So yes, if you thoroughly clean it often enough (whatever that turns out to be for your individual gun & load--and there is no safe general rule to determine how often is often enough), keep away from max loads, and NEVER, EVER shoot jacketed rounds through a bore until you've completely removed lead fouling, then you can shoot your lead reloads in the Glock. If you change anything in your load, you would need to reestablish a cleaning routine based on how the change affects the leading. Again, with no general rule to determine how to establish how often to clean.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
||
March 23, 2013, 10:48 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 3,829
|
Thanks for the info, John. I've talked to many people who shoot lead bullets through their Glocks with no ill effects, but they must clean the heck out of their barrels quite often. I wasn't aware the issue could vary so much between barrels. It sounds like the answer to the OP's question should be, "Yes, but it's risky enough that it's probably not worth it."
__________________
0331: "Accuracy by volume." |
March 23, 2013, 10:52 PM | #9 |
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,972
|
If you've been shooting a particular load in a particular gun with no ill effects, then it should be safe to continue along those lines as long as you never put a jacketed round through the bore unless it's been thoroughly cleaned of lead first.
Just be aware that shooting that identical load in another apparently identical gun may yield very different results in terms of leading and pressure rise, and also that changing some aspect of the load in the original gun may also turn out to change things more dramatically than expected. It's not that it's super risky or dangerous, the problem is that it sometimes can be and it's not really possible to give a solid rule of thumb that will insure safety.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
March 23, 2013, 11:10 PM | #10 |
Junior member
Join Date: November 12, 2000
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Posts: 9,494
|
I shot thousands of lead boolits through my G21 when I had it. The G21 would be the safest glock to do this with because the 45acp operates at such low pressure that you actually have a pretty good leeway with the pressure curve, since the same size design will handle the 10mm just fine.
Besides, if you use a .452 at <1000 fps, it seals well and doesn't lead appreciably. When it does if you shoot it that much, it's very easy to clean out as noted. Keep it clean, if you do shoot jacketed bullets through it at the range, shoot them first, before the lead. I would be a lot more careful with other caliber glocks and lead. 9mms operate at ~35K IIRC? Not much leeway there! Be careful, use your head and you'll be fine. Don't shoot jacketed after the lead because if it's leaded, there's where you'll get your pressure spike. That crap that is repeated about shoot jacketed to clean out the lead is stupid and a wives tale. I couldn't get the lead SWC's to feed in my G21 but it loves RN. |
March 24, 2013, 03:57 AM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 6,079
|
Quote:
Sorry for the mini-hijack, but plated bullets are a cheaper reloading option, if ever factory ammo gets steep, hence my interest. As for lead in Glocks, I too considered it for a while, but never bothered due to the possible risks
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic. Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
|
|
March 24, 2013, 06:48 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 10, 2012
Posts: 3,881
|
After reading all the replies I am thinking its a risk not worth doing to save a little money on bullets. Thank you for all the replies
|
March 24, 2013, 08:54 AM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 12, 2002
Location: The same state as Mordor.
Posts: 5,568
|
Quote:
Take the risk, or factor that price into your calculation when you get your Glock. It's not that expensive. Assuming you can find one in these crazy times.
__________________
"As was the man of dust, so also are those who are of the dust, and as is the man of heaven, so also are those who are of heaven. Just as we have borne the image of the man of dust, we shall also bear the image of the man of heaven. " |
|
March 24, 2013, 06:31 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2006
Posts: 306
|
Glock 21's do not have polygonal rifeling. Other caliber glocks do. My stock Gen 3 - 21c does not.
|
March 24, 2013, 07:57 PM | #15 | ||
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,972
|
Quote:
Quote:
I will say that it's not that easy to tell exactly the nature of the Glock rifling by looking down the bore. It becomes more obvious when you recover a fired bullet. Instead of having conventional rifling grooves, the bullet is squeezed into a polygonal shape. Here's a thread that discusses the topic and has some pictures. http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=266988
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
||
March 24, 2013, 08:23 PM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 26, 2004
Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 13,806
|
Quote:
Too bad the rest of the gun was junk. |
|
March 24, 2013, 10:07 PM | #17 | |
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,972
|
Quote:
There's also the issue that because of the smoother barrel profile, it can be more difficult to detect leading. Had a guy on another forum swear up and down that he had a G17 with a shot out barrel that appeared to be a smoothbore. Turned out the barrel was in great condition, it was just leaded so badly that he couldn't see the rifling. It's a good thing he cleaned it before he tried shooting it. For what it's worth, it's likely that the lower velocity of the .45ACP probably makes the G21 less likely to lead. Still the problem is that there's no way to say for certain how much of a given lead bullet load will be safe in a given pistol.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
|
March 27, 2013, 06:16 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 10, 2012
Posts: 3,881
|
Thank you for all the replies, I'll shoot the lswc's in my Gold Cup and shoot jacketed in the Glock.
|
March 27, 2013, 04:59 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 3, 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 939
|
I personally wouldn't do it. It's not worth the risk of kaboom. If you absolutely must shoot lead, get a lone wolf barrel, or make sure you're cleaning very often. If I had to shoot lead out of my OEM barrel, I probably wouldn't shoot more than 100 rounds without cleaning, but then again, I don't shoot lead, and I won't replace your gun/barrel if it gets damaged...so take my advice with a grain of salt.
|
March 27, 2013, 09:36 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2006
Posts: 1,102
|
Seems like an aftermarket barrel might pay for itself in < 1K rounds.
__________________
.44 Special: For those who get it, no explanation is necessary. For those who don't, no explanation is possible. |
March 27, 2013, 10:00 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 9, 2011
Posts: 1,293
|
[IMG][/IMG]
Nobody told my G35 it couldn't shoot lead. Of course I've only put about 7-8000 rounds of it throught it so maybe it hasn't built up enough leading in the barrel yet. I'm not by ant means advising to shoot lead and will admidt it took some tiral and error to find the right combination of hardness and pressure. Once I did I ordered several thousand rounds and never looked back until my supply ran out. After that I swithced to plated becuase they were actually cheaper then the lead I was shooting. Oh and for all the <deleted> lawyers, Glocks owners manuals say not to shoot reloads. It doesnt specify lead or jacketed. Last edited by JohnKSa; March 27, 2013 at 11:28 PM. Reason: Language. |
March 27, 2013, 11:05 PM | #22 | |
Junior member
Join Date: November 12, 2000
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Posts: 9,494
|
Quote:
The rounds that did jam in it, I would kick to the side and fill an entire mag with them to be ran through my Colt. It was pretty satisfying to have full mags of G21 jammed rounds run like butter through my Colt. |
|
March 27, 2013, 11:28 PM | #23 | |
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,972
|
Quote:
Glock doesn't make a secret of the prohibition on "unjacketed" bullets. I don't know why they don't put it in the owner's manuals, but it is thoroughly covered in the armorers course and in other Glock publications and informational materials.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
|
March 29, 2013, 02:52 AM | #24 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: June 4, 2012
Location: NV
Posts: 743
|
Quote:
Quote:
$150 if you have to ask< I just got one from Lonewolf. |
||
March 29, 2013, 02:56 PM | #25 |
Junior member
Join Date: June 21, 2009
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 1,176
|
I'm not even sure it's the polygonal rifling that causes the problem. It very well could be a sharper shoulder at the front of the chamber & case mouth that allows the build up of lead particles/shavings during firing, and then starts to push each next round further back, until the cartridge fires from a less supported breech.
|
|
|